These fake leftists like former Stalinist CP supporter Angela Davis have
constantly got it wrong again...But the CP/USA have been tail ending after
the democrats for over 70 years.\--------
-------------------------------------------
[image: Black Agenda Report]
Published on *Black Agenda Report* (http://blackagendareport.com)

Home <http://blackagendareport.com/> >
Blogs<http://blackagendareport.com/?q=blog>> Paul
Street's blog <http://blackagendareport.com/?q=blog/213> > “Despite the
Power of Money”: Reflections on the Vapid Obama Commentary of Professor
Angela Davis
------------------------------
“Despite the Power of Money”: Reflections on the Vapid Obama Commentary of
Professor Angela Davis
By *Paul Street*
Created *10/27/2010 - 07:30*
  Submitted by Paul Street on Wed, 10/27/2010 - 07:30

   - Angela 
Davis<http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/angela-davis>
   [1]
   - Brand 
Obama<http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/brand-obama>
   [2]
   - Progressives for
Obama<http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/progressives-obama>
   [3]


*by Paul Street*

Angela Davis recently told television audiences that Barack Obama won the
presidency “despite the power of money.” Any knowledgeable person – much
less a learned academic and activist heroine – should know better. The
reality, which is not in serious dispute, is that Obama “set new corporate
fundraising records, receiving many millions of dollars from powerful Wall
Street firms and other profit-based economic giants.” Prof. Davis is
spouting discredited 2008 campaign propaganda, as a cover for the collapse
of Left opposition to Obama’s pro-war and pro-Wall Street policies.



“*Despite the Power of Money”: Reflections on the Vapid Obama Commentary of
Professor Angela Davis*

*by Paul Street*

“*Obama **developed just as plutocratic (with the same disproportionate
weighting toward large scale contributions) a campaign finance profile as
George W. Bush’s in 2004.”*

We were recently given a revealing glimpse of how limited what passes for
radical commentary can be in the United States during an interview of
Sixties radical turned academician Angela Davis on Amy Goodman’s left
leaning television show “Democracy Now!” Asked by Goodman for her thoughts
on Barack Obama’s election two years ago and “where were are today,”
professor Davis started by saying that “Well, of course, initially, few
people believed that a figure like Barack Obama could ever be elected to the
presidency of the United States, and because there were those who persisted,
and, you know, largely young people, who helped to build this movement to
elect Barack Obama, making use of all of the new technologies of
communication….on…November 4th, 2008, Obama was
elected…”i<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote1sym>

Those reflections were fundamentally wrong on numerous levels. I myself and
many others on the left thought early on that a slippery, squishy, expertly
marketed, telegenic, “eloquent,” charismatic, fake-progressive, “deeply
conservative” and corporate-neoliberal politician and media star like Barack
Obamaii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote2sym>could
definitely be “elected” – well, selected and elevated by the “hidden
primary of the ruling class” (Laurence Shoup) that really chooses the
nation’s top officeholders beneath the pretense of populace
governanceiii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote3sym>–
“to the presidency.” Listen to the following interesting reflection
from
Black Agenda Report’s Michael Perez Hureaux in early 2008:

“I had a hunch this was coming when I watched his speech at the convention
four years ago, my wife and I both sat and took it in and looked at each
other and said, almost word for word, ‘He’s good, he’s very good.’ The
rakish JFK style jabs, the clearly studied rhetorical grace. What better
gift to the empire than JFK in sepia? All last year, numerous discussions
with people from the old new left who told us, “He’ll never get a shot at it
because of racist US, etc.,’ to which we maintained, ‘But what better figure
to have out there than one to restore faith in the imperial project, but
someone with a black face? They managed to live with Powell and Rice, why
not 
Obama?’”iv<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote4sym>

“*What better figure to have out there than one to restore faith in the
imperial project, but someone with a black face?”*

After noting that Obama is “backed by the biggest Wall Street firms,” the
brilliant Left Australian author, journalist, and filmmaker John Pilger made
a similar point in his usual eloquent and deeply informed fashion at the end
of May 2008:

“What is Obama’s attraction to big business? Precisely the same as Robert
Kennedy’s [in 1968]. By offering a “new,” young and apparently progressive
face of Democratic Party – with the bonus of being a member of the black
elite – he can blunt and divert real opposition. That was Colin Powell’s
role as Bush’s secretary of state. An Obama victory will bring intense
pressure on the US antiwar and social justice movements to accept a
Democratic administration for all its faults. If that happens, domestic
resistance to rapacious America will fall silent
v<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote5sym>

Those were my sentiments from early on and such instincts were less uncommon
vi<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote6sym>than
Dr. Davis may know in radical circles beyond the stultifying mindset
of
the corporate university. We figured the time was right for a certain kind
of nonwhite president, just the re-branding medicine that Uncle Sam’s doctor
ordered after the damage done to America’s public image and the American
system by the long national Bush-Cheney nightmare.

And clearly a large number of Wall Street and K Street insiders thought
early on that Obama could possibly prevail. They invested heavily in his
campaign after vetting him and finding out that “a figure like Barack Obama”
was completely safe and inordinately useful for existing dominant domestic
and imperial hierarchies and doctrines. Professor Davis is free to think
that college kids on the Internet pushed Obama into the White House but the
real story has far more to do with more mundane, traditional and timeworn
factors: Wall Street backing, establishment approval, corporate media love,
and a bad economy that worked against the incumbent
party.vii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote7sym>

So where are we and the president today?

“Now, here we are two years later [professor Davis said] and many people are
treating this as if it were business as usual. As a matter of fact, many
people are dissatisfied with the Obama administration, because [it] fail[s]
to fulfill all of our dreams. And, you know, one of the points that I
frequently make is that we have to beware of our tendency here in this
country to look for messiahs and to project our own possible potential power
on to others. What really disturbs me is that we have failed. Well, of
course, I’m dissatisfied with many of the things that Obama has done. The
war in Afghanistan needs to end right now. The healthcare bill could have
been much stronger than it turned out to be. There are many issues about
which we can be critical of Obama, but at the same time, I think we need to
be critical of ourselves for not generating the kind of mass pressure to
compel the Obama administration to move in a more progressive direction,
remembering that the election was, in large part, primarily the result of
just such a mass movement that was created by ordinary people all over the
country.”

“*Professor Davis is free to think that college kids on the Internet pushed
Obama into the White House but the real story has far more to do with Wall
Street backing, establishment approval, corporate media love, and a bad
economy that worked against the incumbent party.”*

There is much that actual leftists can agree with in this passage. Of course
serious progressive change is about pressuring major party state capitalist
office-holders from the bottom up. Naturally we should not look to
politicians and officeholders to fix contemporary messes; we’ve got to do it
ourselves as citizens. Yes, the struggle continues. As Howard Zinn used to
say, “it’s not about who’s sitting in the White House; it’s about who’s
sitting in.” Fine. But it’s sad to see Davis ignore the elementary facts
that (i) the corporate-imperial Obama campaign worked expertly and overtime
to seduce “progressive” voters (and every other kind of voter they could
attract with Brand Obama) to “project [their] own potential power” on to
Obamessiah; (ii) the business-friendly and militaristic Obama presidency has
worked consistently to undermine, deflect, and intimidate serious
progressive protest of its corporate and imperial agenda, using threats,
mockery, denial of access, surveillance, and raids to those ends.

The outrageous corporate health bill “could have been much stronger” and
“there are many issues about which we can be critical of Obama”? Wow. This
is egregious under-statement from a self-respecting left perspective! Let’s
be real about the depth and degree of “business as usual” (yes, many people
DO see that, professor Davis) under Obama. Consistent with the predictions
of my 2008 book *Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics* (written
in late 2007 and early 2008, carrying accolades on the back cover from the
nation’s leading Left thinkers but never featured or even mentioned on
“Democracy Now”), the administration has been a great monument to the old
French saying *plus ca change plus c’est la meme chose *(the more things
change the more they stay the same). With its monumental bailout of
hyper-opulent financial overlords, its refusal to nationalize and cut down
the parasitic too-big (too powerful)-to-fail financial institutions that
have paralyzed the economy, its passage of a health reform bill that only
the big insurance and drug companies could love (consistent with Rahm
Emmanuel’s advice to the president: “ignore the progressives”), its cutting
of an auto bailout deal that rewards capital flight, its undermining of
serious global carbon emission reduction at Copenhagen, its refusal to
advance serious public works programs (green or otherwise), its disregarding
of promises to labor and other popular constituencies, and other betrayals
of its “progressive base” (the other side of the coin of promises kept to
its corporate sponsors), the “change” and “hope” (Bill Clinton’s campaign
keywords in 1992) presidency of Barack Obama has brilliantly demonstrated
the power of what Edward S. Herman and David Peterson call “the unelected
dictatorship of money.” As Bill Greider noted in* The Washington Post *last
year, “People everywhere [have] learned a blunt lesson about power, who has
it and who doesn’t. They [have] watched Washington run to rescue the very
financial interests that caused the catastrophe. They [have] learned that
government has plenty of money to spend when the right people want
it.”viii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote8sym>

“*The business-friendly and militaristic Obama presidency has worked
consistently to undermine, deflect, and intimidate serious progressive
protest of its corporate and imperial agenda.”*

The “right people” include the top military contractors and the Pentagon, of
course. The “new” White House has escalated Superpower violence in South
Asia, passed a record-setting “defense” (Empire) budget, rolled over George
W. Bush’s not-so counter-terrorist assault on human rights (in the name of
“freedom”), extended the imperial terror war to Yemen and Somalia, disguised
escalated U.S. occupation of Haiti as humanitarian relief, aided and abetted
a thuggish right wing coup in Honduras, expanded the Pentagon’s reach in
Columbia/Latin America, and…. I could go on and did in my new book on
Obama’s first year in office: *The Empire’s New Clothes: Barack Obama in the
Real World of Power *(Paradigm, 2010)
ix<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote9sym>

The last point in Davis’s paragraph quoted above is, I am sorry to say,
hopelessly inaccurate. The Obama campaign was not a grassroots social
movement created by ordinary people struggling for progressive change from
the bottom up any more than a fish is a cat or than war is peace.* *It was a
top-down, candidate-centered operation in which “rank and file” activists
got their marching orders from distant campaign elites, themselves equipped
with the latest technologies and marketing techniques that record-setting
corporate and other big money campaign contributions could provide.

“Again,” Davis told Amy Goodman, “I would return to the election of Barack
Obama. Barack Obama was elected despite that kind of a [business and prison]
lobby, despite the power of money. And so, we have to continue the campaign
for a better world, drawing upon all of our resources.”

Not good! Yes, the struggle continues. But no, no, no – a thousand times no!
Barack Obama was NOT elected “despite the power of money!” (Here we perhaps
witness the well-known dumbing-down effect of an academic career: surely the
pre-tenure Angela Davis of 1969 would never have uttered such a plainly
false comment as that). He set new corporate fundraising records, receiving
many millions of dollars from powerful Wall Street firms and other
profit-based economic giants. He developed just as plutocratic (with the
same disproportionate weighting toward large scale contributions) a campaign
finance profile as George W. Bush’s in 2004. Here is an interesting and
accurate reflection from an anonymous reader commenting on a recent ZNet
essay of mine:

Follow the money. Don't know about this year, but look at presidential
funding from 2000,2004, and 2008. In 2000 and 2004, we saw Bush and his
Pioneers and their massive fundraising machine that raised about $370
million in each election. In 2008, we saw McCain take public financing
because he couldn't raise a measly $80 million in the general election.
Where did that money go?

“*The Obama campaign was not a grassroots social movement created by
ordinary people struggling for progressive change from the bottom up any
more than a fish is a cat or than war is peace.”*

Obama raised $750 million in 2008, nearly doubling the Bush record.
OpenSecrets.org says that 1/3 was in small donation (less than $200). But
that leaves $500 million in 'big' donations. More than the totals Bush
raised in either 2000 or 2004.

We know Wall Street gave about $30 million for their 1)bailouts, 2)
protection from prosecution, and 3) protection from real reform. We know
that the big health care corps gave about the same $30 million to 1) keep
single-payer off the table, 2) get their $500 billion in tax credits, and 3)
their mandated customers. And those amounts are just to Obama alone, and
don't include their buying of Senators and
Repsx<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote10sym>
.

The real story on candidate Obama’s money was told in my aforementioned 2008
book, written by someone outside the incestuous, academic-addicted celebrity
system of “the [U.S.] left,” such as it is.

*Paul Street **(*www.paulstreet.org* [4]**) is the author of many articles,
chapters, speeches, and books, including Empire and Inequality: America and
the World Since 9/11 (Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 2008); Racial Oppression in the
Global Metropolis (New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007; Segregated Schools:
Educational Apartheid in the Post-Civil Rights Era (New York: Routledge,
2005); Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics (Boulder, CO:
Paradigm, 2008); and The Empire’s New Clothes: Barack Obama in the Real
World of Power (Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 2010). Street is currently completing
a book titled “Crashing the Tea Party,” co-authored with Anthony Dimaggio.
He can be reached at *paulstree...@yahoo.com* [5]*

*NOTES*

i<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote1anc>“Angela
Davis on the Prison Abolishment Movement, Frederick Douglass, the 40th
Anniversary of Her Arrest and President Obama’s First Two Years,” Democracy
Now! (October 19, 2010) at
www.democracynow.org/2010/10/19/angela_davis_on_the_prison_abolishment* [6]*



ii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote2anc>A
portrait that is given rich empirical detail in my widely
“left”-ignored
book Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics (Boulder, CO: Paradigm
Publishers, 2008). For “deeply conservative,” see liberal-center journalist
Larrisa MacFarquhar’s early portrait in
*<http://www.newyorker.com/search/query?query=authorName:>
[7]* “The Conciliator: Where is Barack Obama Coming From?,*”** The New
Yorker *(May* *7, 2007). For a fascinating description of Obama at the very
beginning of his political career, see Adolph Reed, Jr., “The Curse of
Community,”* Village Voice* (January 16, 1996), reproduced in Reed,* Class
Notes: Posing as Politics and Other Thoughts on the American Scene *(New
York, 2000). This is how Reed described the 30-something Obama in his 1996
book *Class Notes*, published *eight years *before the world discovered the
“Obama phenomenon” and before Left commentators activists (the present
writer included) began noting its distinct apparent corporate-neoliberal
centrism: “In Chicago, for instance, we’ve gotten a foretaste of the new
breed of foundation-hatched black communitarian voices: one of them, a
smooth Harvard lawyer with impeccable credentials and vacuous to repressive
neoliberal politics, has won a state senate seat on a base mainly in the
liberal foundation and development worlds. His fundamentally bootstrap line
was softened by a patina of the rhetoric of authentic community, talk about
meeting in kitchens, small-scale solutions to social problems, and the
predictable elevation of process over program – the point where identity
politics converges with old-fashioned middle class reform in favoring form
over substances. I suspect that his ilk is the wave of the future in U.S.
black politics here, as in Haiti and wherever the International Monetary
Fund has sway.” An interesting day one take on what Dr. Davis calls “a
figure like Barack Obama.”



iii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote3anc>Laurence
H. Shoup, “The Presidential Election 2008,”
*Z Magazine* (February 2008).



iv<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote4anc>Common
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/barack-obama-and-the-%e2%80%9cend%e2%80%9d-of-racism/

v<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote5anc>

 John Pilger, “After Bobby Kennedy (There Was Barack Obama),” *Common
Dreams* (May 31, 2008), read at
www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/31/9327/* [8]*



vi<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote6anc>See
also the fascinating reflections in Juan Santos, “Barack Obama and the
End of Racism,” *Dissident Voice* (February 13, 2008).

vii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote7anc>

 Ken Silverstein, “Barack Obama, Inc.: The Birth of a Washington
Machine,”*Harper’s
* (November 2006);

Pam Martens, “Obama’s Money Cartel,” *CounterPunch* (February 23, 2008) read
online at http://zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/16601* [9]*; Pam
Martens, “The Obama Bubble: Why Wall Street Needs a Presidential Brand,” *Black
Agenda Report* (March 5, 2008); John Pilger, “After Bobby Kennedy (There Was
Barack Obama),” *Common Dreams* (May 31, 2008), read at
www.commondreams.org/archive/
2008/05/ 31/9327/<http://www.commondreams.org/archive/%202008/05/%2031/9327/>
* [10]*; Street, Barack Obama, 1-72.* *

viii<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote8anc>

 William Greider, “Obama Asked Us to Speak But is He Listening?” *Washington
Post*,, March 22, 2009.



ix<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote9anc>“Introduction:
‘An Instant Overhaul for Tainted Brand America’”

Chapter 1: Business Rule as Usual

Chapter 2: Empire’s New Clothes: Words and Deeds in Obama’s Foreign Policy

Chapter 3: Corporate-Managed “Health Reform”

Chapter 4: Barack Obama, the Myth of the Postracial Presidency, and the
Politics of Identity

Chapter 5. Big Brother Lives

Chapter 6: We Were Warned

Afterword: Beyond the Perverted and Deadly Priorities of Empire and
Inequality, Inc.

Postscript: The Sorry Surrender of the So-Called Radical Left

x<http://blackagendareport.com/print/content/“despite-power-money”-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis#sdendnote10anc>

 Comment from “Samson” at 16:32 pm on October 25, 20010
http://www.zcommunications.org/all-of-them-make-promises-reflections-on-the-big-hope-chill-and-the-coming-democratic-debacle-by-paul-street
* [11]*


[image: Share 
this]<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2F%3Fq%3Dcontent%2F%25E2%2580%259Cdespite-power-money%25E2%2580%259D-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis&linkname=%E2%80%9CDespite%20the%20Power%20of%20Money%E2%80%9D%3A%20Reflections%20on%20the%20Vapid%20Obama%20Commentary%20of%20Professor%20Angela%20Davis>
[12]

   - Angela 
Davis<http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/angela-davis>
   - Brand 
Obama<http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/brand-obama>
   - Progressives for
Obama<http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/progressives-obama>

 ------------------------------
*Source URL:*
http://blackagendareport.com/?q=content/%E2%80%9Cdespite-power-money%E2%80%9D-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis

*Links:*
[1] http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/angela-davis
[2] http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/brand-obama
[3] http://blackagendareport.com/?q=category/us-politics/progressives-obama
[4] http://www.paulstreet.org/
[5] mailto:paulstree...@yahoo.com
[6]
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/10/19/angela_davis_on_the_prison_abolishment
[7] http://www.newyorker.com/search/query?query=authorName:
[8] http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/05/31/9327/
[9] http://zcommunications.org/znet/viewArticle/16601
[10] http://www.commondreams.org/archive/%202008/05/%2031/9327/
[11]
http://www.zcommunications.org/all-of-them-make-promises-reflections-on-the-big-hope-chill-and-the-coming-democratic-debacle-by-paul-street
[12]
http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2F%3Fq%3Dcontent%2F%25E2%2580%259Cdespite-power-money%25E2%2580%259D-reflections-vapid-obama-commentary-professor-angela-davis&amp;linkname=%E2%80%9CDespite%20the%20Power%20of%20Money%E2%80%9D%3A%20Reflections%20on%20the%20Vapid%20Obama%20Commentary%20of%20Professor%20Angela%20Davis


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAAMN: Los Angeles Alternative Media Network
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: <mailto:laamn-unsubscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: <mailto:laamn-subscr...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: <mailto:laamn-dig...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Help: <mailto:laamn-ow...@egroups.com?subject=laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post: <mailto:la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive1: <http://www.egroups.com/messages/laamn>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive2: <http://www.mail-archive.com/la...@egroups.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/laamn/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    laamn-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    laamn-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    laamn-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to