Re: [lace] Convention Teacher Showcase

2016-05-22 Thread Cadega2
Hello Bev and all, The pattern for @-Arachne is free to download from my web, and I designed it for all Arachneans. This is the first mail I send to Majordomo from gmail. I have decided to subscribe with another server than AOL, as I was sure I was missing mails from the list. Regards from

Re: [lace] Convention Teacher Showcase

2016-05-22 Thread Helene Ulrich
I think the idea of an Arachne table is a wonderful idea. Thanks to the group, I was able to find both of my lace teachers, and find a lace group to join. Thanks to the group I have met fellow lace makers from Australia (we were both in England at the same time) and South Africa (he was visiting

RE: [lace] Core ground

2016-05-22 Thread Jeanette Fischer
Thanks to all for you help. Alexa Stillwell and Lorelei were correct- it is a typo and should be cord ground for which we found the instructions in the Book of bobbin lace stitches. Thank you for pointing us in the right direction. It does look a rather un-Bucks ground!! Jeanette Fischer South

[lace] Core ground

2016-05-22 Thread Alex Stillwell
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 18:27:23 +0200 From: "Jeanette Fischer" Subject: [lace] Core ground A friend is doing a Buck's piece and the instructions use the term "core ground". Neither of us have heard the term before Hi Jeanette Sorry, cannot help you with core ground but

Re: [lace] Core ground

2016-05-22 Thread lacel...@frontier.com
When I read "core ground", my thought was that it was someone's private term for the central/main/basic stitch, which would be the CTTT pin that is used so much in Bucks.  I've never heard the term "core ground" before.  it will be interesting if someone turns up with a special stitch. Alice in

RE: [lace] core ground

2016-05-22 Thread Jeanette Fischer
Thank you to all for your help. We looked in every Bucks book we could find but I did not think of looking in this book. Jeanette Fiscer South Africa There is a ground, used rarely in Bucks, called "cord ground". Is it possible your source has a typo? It is basically the same as the little