Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox)

2003-08-31 Thread Thelacebee
typicall lacers - I could make that ... if I had all the bobbins grin Liz In a message dated 28/08/2003 18:10:18 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subj: Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox) Date: 28/08/2003 18:10:18 GMT Daylight Time From: A HREF=mailto

RE: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox)

2003-08-28 Thread Marcie Greer
A couple of things... the first is that the pricking published by Ruth Bean is not the original but an adaptation by Anne Buck of the original. Perhaps she can have some influence on the possibility of republishing the pricking? Does anyone know when Ruth Bean Publishers started in business? If it

Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox)

2003-08-28 Thread palmhaven
Message - From: Panza, Robin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Marcie Greer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Arachne (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:05 AM Subject: RE: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox) From: Marcie Greer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Second

Re: [lace] Miss Channer/enforcement issues (Soapbox)

2003-08-28 Thread WaltonVS
Yes, if you own something it is your right what you do with it. Also a lot of the people on this soap box have never seen the mat, second it is quite boring, third they couldn't do it and finally the only thing that excites people is the number of bobbins! KEEP LACING, VIVIENNE,