Carol,
That "delay" is by no means universal in digital cameras. I've heard
that more expensive cameras are much faster. The low-end cameras have
a noticeable delay, which is a pain if you're not ready for an 'action
shot.' (If you are ready, then you can tap the shutter button a couple
times to
ssage -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 8:53 AM
Subject: [lace] digital cameras- for
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As everyone knows, I'm the Last Dinosaur when it comes to technology
(as a matter of fact, I think that, on Nov 2, my sig will change to
"pox on all technology" ), so it may be surprising that I should
weigh in on the side of "pro", when it comes to a digital camera :)
Mine, a Nikon Coolpix 885
"I wouldn't touch a digital camera with a barge-pole! They are dreadful, and
only give you very mediocre results."
Sorry, I have to disagree with your Committee member. I have a Canon digi
(not bottom of the range by any means but nothing even approaching 10,000
dollars!) and if you are inter
I have a low end digital camera that does all I want it to do BUT, IMHO the
answer is in the software manipulation of the images.
It is just amazing what you can do with a good graphic package, even free
ones ( The Gimp)
Sure they do take a farley steep learning curve, but then on the results a
