On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 20:18:01 -0700 (PDT), Bev wrote:
Steph wrote:
When someone buys a pricking (whether in a book or as
a single piece of paper) they buy the right to make lace from the
pricking.
However they do not buy the right to copy in any other way. That's why
putting a picture of
Hi everyone - to prolong the discussion only a bit more:
or deriving any work from the copyrighted work. By making lace you are
deriving a work in thread from the pricking.
No, you are using the pricking for its intended use - a derivation would
be altering the pricking, or taking elements of
someone doesn't buy a book because then she will be unable to show the
finished piece to her friends without getting permission from the author?
As the one who has been most vocal on this point, I have to say
again--there's never been any claim that you can't show your work to your
friends.
, Robin
Sent: 26 August 2004 15:05
To: Arachne (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [lace] Intent of copyright law
As the one who has been most vocal on this point, I have to say
again--there's never been any claim that you can't show your work to your
friends. However, publishing to the web is mass-production
