Re: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-18 Thread aurelia loveman
on 7/14/04 7:53 PM, Janice Blair at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I think Torchon would be more masculine and Bucks more feminine, if you go > with Ipswich you might have to send us all directions for making the lace > pieces. I am sure a lot of us don't have the Ipswich book yet so we would

Re: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-14 Thread Barb ETx
Great ideas, Clay.I like the idea of nine different laces... BarbE - Original Message - From: Clay Blackwell To: Robin Panza ; Arachne (E-mail) Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 5:43 PM Subject: RE: [lace] Judge Judy not alone! Welll. Yes, it IS the only

RE: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-14 Thread Clay Blackwell
t; Date: 7/14/2004 11:41:52 AM > Subject: RE: [lace] Judge Judy not alone! > > have ALL got to wear jabots! Lacemakers, arise! As soon as I get nine > committed jabot-makers, I will produce a pattern. 5-to-4 Floral > Bucks/Torchon? << > > I don't know, Aurelia, if you

RE: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-14 Thread Diane Williams
I LOVE this idea! Count me in! Diane Williams Galena, Illiois USA [EMAIL PROTECTED] > And since it > is the United States, I think they should be done in > Ipswich lace, the only > (as far as I know) definable American lace. > > Robin P. > Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA > http://www.pittsburghla

Re: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-14 Thread Sue Babbs
> >Two jabots are definitely not enough. Cannot have reverse discrimination. They > have ALL got to wear jabots! Lacemakers, arise! As soon as I get nine > committed jabot-makers, I will produce a pattern. 5-to-4 Floral > Bucks/Torchon? << Aurelia > People wouldn't need to complete a whole jabot,

RE: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-14 Thread Panza, Robin
have ALL got to wear jabots! Lacemakers, arise! As soon as I get nine committed jabot-makers, I will produce a pattern. 5-to-4 Floral Bucks/Torchon? << I don't know, Aurelia, if you do it 5-4, you may be influencing the voting of the Supreme Court of this land! Will they have to vote along jab

Re: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-14 Thread aurelia loveman
on 7/13/04 6:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A Supreme Court portrait contained at > http://www.umich.edu/~urecord/0203/June16_03/02_portrait.shtml > > shows both female justices in jabots. > > Eureka! Have you worked out the design yet Aurelia? > > Devon >Two jabots are

Re: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-13 Thread Dmt11home
In a message dated 7/13/2004 7:09:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sandra Day O'Connor looks as if she might just have something lacy round her throat Be still my beating heart! Devon - To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line: unsubscribe lace

Re: [lace] Judge Judy not alone!

2004-07-13 Thread Ruth Budge
Sandra Day O'Connor looks as if she might just have something lacy round her throat Ruth Budge (Sydney, Australia) --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > A Supreme Court portrait contained at > http://www.umich.edu/~urecord/0203/June16_03/02_portrait.shtml > > shows both female justices in jabots.