[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

I have no opposing comments on their approval. I've gone through their contributions and they've been quite active also followed by the expert verification. Tochi On Sat, Apr 27, 2024, 1:26 PM Sotiale Wiki wrote: > Please provide your feedback by 30 April. Otherwise, it is considered that >

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

Please provide your feedback by 30 April. Otherwise, it is considered that you have agreed. I feel very sorry for their community because there is no discussion even though there is the expert verification. Sotiale 2024년 4월 10일 (수) 오후 1:24, Sotiale Wiki 님이 작성: > I have sent the expert

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

I have sent the expert verification results regarding this to our internal mailing list 9 days ago. So please leave your comments! Sotiale 바이러스가 없습니다.www.avast.com

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

Oh, I was informed that they might be working on it now. They say there will be a reply within this month. Sotiale 바이러스가 없습니다.www.avast.com

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

Unfortunately, the expert has not responded to my email. I plan to find another expert.. Sotiale 바이러스가 없습니다.www.avast.com

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

Did you have success? Am So., 3. März 2024 um 05:31 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki : > Although no one had an opinion on this, I think everyone missed it and am > going through an expert review process first. > > Sotiale > > 2024년 2월 20일 (화) 오후 11:50, Sotiale Wiki 님이 작성: > >> Dear Language committee

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

Although no one had an opinion on this, I think everyone missed it and am going through an expert review process first. Sotiale 2024년 2월 20일 (화) 오후 11:50, Sotiale Wiki 님이 작성: > Dear Language committee members, > > Hi all. > > I would like to ask for comments on the approval of *Wp/dtp*. It has