[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Mossi Wikipedia

New attempt made. Am Do., 11. Apr. 2024 um 19:58 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > No response from the person in question, we're looking for another one. > > Amir E. Aharoni schrieb am Do., 11. Apr. > 2024, 19:42: > >> Any news about that? >

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Mossi Wikipedia

No response from the person in question, we're looking for another one. Amir E. Aharoni schrieb am Do., 11. Apr. 2024, 19:42: > Any news about that? > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי > http://aharoni.wordpress.com > ‪“We're living in pieces, > I want to live in peace.”

[Langcom] Kanuri or Central Kanuri?

Please see < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Kanuri>. There's an active project at Wp/knc. Interface translation however is not enabled for knc, but for kr: , < https://codelookup.toolforge.org/kr>.

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Mossi Wikipedia

I have contacted someone on recommendation from the community. Am Do., 29. Feb. 2024 um 14:13 Uhr schrieb Amir E. Aharoni < amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il>: > Almost a year later... Does anyone have an idea about finding an expert? > The activity is still ok. > > -- > Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר

[Langcom] Re: Malay Wikisource

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Notification_about_proposed_approval_of_Malay_Wikisource There is already an interesting question. Am Mo., 18. März 2024 um 12:42 Uhr schrieb Satdeep Gill < satdeepg...@gmail.com>: > I just learnt about the policy that if there are no

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Central Dusun Wikipedia

Did you have success? Am So., 3. März 2024 um 05:31 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki : > Although no one had an opinion on this, I think everyone missed it and am > going through an expert review process first. > > Sotiale > > 2024년 2월 20일 (화) 오후 11:50, Sotiale Wiki 님이 작성: > >> Dear Language committee

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Karakalpak Wiktionary

Thanks Sotiale. I looked at some random pages and the quality seems ok. @Satdeep: you will be happy to hear that this is already the case :) Am Mo., 18. März 2024 um 05:25 Uhr schrieb Satdeep Gill < satdeepg...@gmail.com>: > I approve! > > I would also like to propose that in case there is no

[Langcom] Re: Shan Wikinews

I tried to look at some recently written news articles in Wp/shn, but it seems all they do is create templates? Do you know what's going on? Am Di., 27. Feb. 2024 um 04:31 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki < sotiale...@gmail.com>: > I am positive that this community will continue to edit. > It's just

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Betawi Wikipedia

For the record: T357866 Am Mi., 17. Jan. 2024 um 10:55 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > Please go ahead! > > Sotiale Wiki schrieb am Mi., 17. Jan. 2024, 10:11: > >> So can we approve this? I will post about this on metawiki. >> In the meanti

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Rakhine(or Arakanese) Wikipedia

No objections= can be approved. But we need verification of the content. What was the result of the question about the language name? Sotiale Wiki schrieb am So., 14. Jan. 2024, 06:57: > Hi all. > > I see no reason to rate the approval of this project less favorably than > the previously

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Betawi Wikipedia

Please go ahead! Sotiale Wiki schrieb am Mi., 17. Jan. 2024, 10:11: > So can we approve this? I will post about this on metawiki. > In the meantime, if you have any objections, please raise them at any time. > > Sotiale > > 2023년 11월 22일 (수) 오후 7:31, Jan Wohlgemuth 님이 작성: > >> Dear all, >> we

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Mooré Wikipedia

Is there a possibility for verification? Am Di., 3. Okt. 2023 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Agreed! > > lør. 30. sep. 2023 kl. 17:00 skrev Anass Sedrati : > >> Hello, >> I am in favor of this approval as well! >> Best regards, >> Anass >> >> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 4:10 PM Sotiale

[Langcom] Re: Fon Wikipedia: recommended approval

The wiki was created, but it would still be good to give an answer to the question someone asked at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Notification_about_proposed_approval_of_Fon_Wikipedia Am Di., 26. Sept. 2023 um 02:23 Uhr schrieb Amir E. Aharoni <

[Langcom] Re: "Global Council" discussions

Posted: < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Movement_Charter/Content/Global_Council#Comments_from_Langcom_about_Langcom-related_points > Am Sa., 23. Sept. 2023 um 13:16 Uhr schrieb Anass Sedrati < sedra...@gmail.com>: > Hello MF-Warburg, > > So sorry for my late a

[Langcom] Re: "Global Council" discussions

@ Anass: Can you convey these comments? Otherwise I can only post them on Meta on Wednesday. MF-Warburg schrieb am Mi., 13. Sept. 2023, 01:30: > If there are no other comments, I will post these on the talk page. > > Am Di., 5. Sept. 2023 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg &

[Langcom] Re: "Global Council" discussions

If there are no other comments, I will post these on the talk page. Am Di., 5. Sept. 2023 um 22:15 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > Some comments, I invite your additions and comments. I hope we can have a > consensus so we can give our comments

[Langcom] Re: "Global Council" discussions

rce and Wikiversity are being incubated on the Multilingual Wikisource and BetaWikiversity, respectively. Am Fr., 1. Sept. 2023 um 13:28 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > I will try to write something over the weekend. > > Am Sa., 26. Aug. 2023 um 10:03 Uhr s

[Langcom] Re: "Global Council" discussions

;> the past will be implemented. >> >> Sotiale >> >> >> >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail> >> 바이러스가 >> 없습니다.www.avast.com >> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_m

[Langcom] Re: Moroccan Tamazight (Wp/zgh)

orical reasons, but it is still a standardized language, and only a >> written one. This said, it will of course never be considered to close the >> Arabic Wikipedia because of it. Therefore, it can be really tricky to base >> the decisions on this argument, although it is understandab

[Langcom] Re: Moroccan Tamazight (Wp/zgh)

NB: there has also been a discussion at < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Moroccan_Amazigh#Clerking_note>. I believe there are several requests open for related languages. It would be good to have some clarity to avoid the community being split into multiple

[Langcom] Re: Proposed change in technical aspect of creating new wikis

I have no issues with technical changes which make doing the work easier. I just wonder what "Members of langcom or other volunteers can set the logo or other pieces afterwards" means. How quickly will the settings be added, and by whom? It would be annoying to have a created wiki, but people have

[Langcom] Re: Haryanvi - script issues

d that means script. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 18:03, MF-Warburg wrote: > >> I think the issue here is not with fonts or Unicode, but with the fact >> that the language is written in two different scripts, which don't have >> (and mayb

[Langcom] Re: Fwd: Re: Proposed approval of the Dagaare Wikipedia

I don't have reservations anymore if we can get verification. Am Mi., 26. Juli 2023 um 13:35 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > It seems fine to me. The activity for July is really high. Do you still > have some reservations, MF-Warburg (or others, for that matter)? > > In any case,

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Igala Wikipedia

ontent imbalance is a problem; it would be nice to see >> more variation in the type of content that is covered, but that will come >> with time. As long as the activity is strong, I'm not worried. >> >> Shall we go ahead with the approval? >> >> >> >> t

[Langcom] Re: Haryanvi - script issues

vial >> task with straightforward character-to-character correspondences like >> Serbian, but it is possible and it has been done (not within Wikimedia, but >> by researchers in India) >> >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2023, 4:21 AM MF-Warburg wrote: >> >>> Please s

[Langcom] "Global Council" discussions

I have noticed that at < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter/Content/Global_Council#Responsibilities_and_associated_Powers>, it is suggested to make the proposed Global Council responsible for oversight over Langcom, instead of - like it currently is - the Board. So far, nobody has

[Langcom] Bangladeshi Meitei

Similar problem to the previous email (I think). See < https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Incubator:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Wp/mni-beng_as_a_test_wiki >. In this case, I think the best solution might be that we encourage the community to obtain a separate ISO 639-3 code, as the

[Langcom] Haryanvi - script issues

Please see the comment signed Ameen Akbar at < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Haryanvi >. There seems to be only one ISO code but two (incompatible?) writing systems. Thoughts? ___ Langcom mailing list --

[Langcom] Re: Georgian Wikisource

I have to agree with Sotiale. With the current activity, we can't approve it. I'm open to discuss the specifics of Wikisource though. But as of now, there seem to be no Georgian users interested in at least accompanying the switch to a separate wiki, which will always need at least some

[Langcom] Re: [Private Langcom] Approval for Sundanese Wikisource

Fine by me. (Sending to the public list as well, this doesn't need to be on the private one) Am Mi., 12. Juli 2023 um 16:06 Uhr schrieb Satdeep Gill < satdeepg...@gmail.com>: > Hi all, > > I think Sundanese Wikisource is ready to become a new Wikisource. Request > on Meta Wiki >

[Langcom] Re: Action required!

I'm seeing such a mail quoted in a mail sent by you on May 1. It seems like it was rejected from the list. I am hoping also some other langcom members can comment on the Montenegrin issue. However, as I and others have said in the past discussions, there is nothing particularly new about the

[Langcom] Re: Fwd: A problem of Sylheti Wikipedia and possible soultions

existing open-source converter looks promising, and hopefully we can > adapt this to MediaWiki quite easily. I'll reach out to the Sylheti > community to ask for their input as well. > > tor. 15. juni 2023 kl. 07:58 skrev MF-Warburg : > >> >> >> -- Forwarded

[Langcom] Fwd: Re: Proposed approval of the Dagaare Wikipedia

editathon focused on Ghanaian members of Parliament, at least in the Kusaal test-wiki. See here: https://incubator.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/kus/8th_Parliament_of_the_4th_Republic_of_Ghana On Mon, Jun 19, 2023, 2:03 PM MF-Warburg wrote: > This project too has a large percentage of its articles ab

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of Mossi Wikipedia

No objection from me. Am Di., 13. Juni 2023 um 22:41 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Hi all, > > I would like to propose the approval of the Mooré/Mossi Wikipedia (Wp/mos) > [1]. The activity has been stable for several months [2], and the > translation of the most important messages is done

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Igala Wikipedia

Here again I notice a content imbalance - most articles seem to be about actors, and there are only about 160 of them. Am Di., 13. Juni 2023 um 22:54 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Hi all, > > I would like to propose the approval of the Igala Wikipedia (Wp/igl) [1]. > The activity has been high

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Pa'O Wiktionary

No objection. Am Di., 13. Juni 2023 um 23:12 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Hello all, > > I would like to propose the approval of the Pa'O Wiktionary (Wt/blk) [1]. > The activity has been high and stable since around November 2022 [2]; there > is also a good and ongoing effort to localize

[Langcom] Re: Suggested approval of Banjar Wikiquote

My impression about the content is the same. Am Di., 13. Juni 2023 um 23:07 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Revisiting this… The activity is still good, especially for a Wikiquote > project. > > tor. 23. mars 2023 kl. 17:32 skrev MF-Warburg : > >> That's possible. I see tha

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Dagaare Wikipedia

This project too has a large percentage of its articles about members of parliament (though less than Kusaal). Is there some recommendation flowing around to concentrate on such articles? Am Di., 13. Juni 2023 um 22:56 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Hello all, > > I would like to propose the

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of Kusaal Wikipedia

It feels a bit early to me, especially since the vast majority of articles seem to only be about member of parliament. Am Di., 13. Juni 2023 um 22:50 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Hi all, > > I would like to propose the approval of the Kusaal Wikipedia (Wp/kus) [1]. > Its activity has been

[Langcom] Fwd: A problem of Sylheti Wikipedia and possible soultions

-- Forwarded message - Von: Ami Keu Date: Mi., 14. Juni 2023 um 23:21 Uhr Subject: Fwd: A problem of Sylheti Wikipedia and possible soultions To: -- Forwarded message - From: Ami Keu Date: Wed, 14 June, 2023 at 10:05 PM Subject: A problem of Sylheti Wikipedia

[Langcom] Re: Montenegrin - ineligible?

nd there are plenty of > >> languages bundled under a single ISO code. > >> > >> mvh. K > >> > >> - > >> > >> From: Jon Harald Søby > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2023 4:55 PM > >> To: Wikimedia Fou

[Langcom] Re: Montenegrin - ineligible?

I agree. Amir E. Aharoni schrieb am Di., 25. Apr. 2023, 14:26: > Hi, > > There's this old, contentious discussion: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Montenegrin_5 > > I somehow thought that it's already marked as ineligible, but it isn't. > I'd say that it

[Langcom] Re: approve the Fante Wikipedia

Thanks for the explanation. I have no objection to the approval. Am Di., 4. Apr. 2023 um 15:26 Uhr schrieb Amir E. Aharoni < amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il>: > I don't know what was intended with Akan exactly. As far as I can see, It > was created in 2004, and Twi was created in 2003. I'm not

[Langcom] Re: approve the Fante Wikipedia

Could you briefly explain the relationship with Twi? Was akwiki "intended" to encompass both Twi and Fante, but it turned out they are too dissimilar from each other? Amir E. Aharoni schrieb am So., 2. Apr. 2023, 17:42: > Hi, > > I recommend approving the Fante Wikipedia (code "fat"). >

[Langcom] Re: Starting Wikipedia Incubator in Dendi

I want to add: the vast majority of requests are unproblematic and are usually marked as eligible by a single member of langcom, without consultation. This is provided for in the < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_committee/Voting_policy>: "Any committee member can mark clearly eligible

[Langcom] Re: Starting Wikipedia Incubator in Dendi

Wp/sux is a deleted page, and https://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/sjn is categorized as rejected. The numbers of those categories should generally be accurate. Fake codes shouldn't exist on Incubator anymore, we had a cleanup of those years ago and nowadays an abusefilter is preventing the

[Langcom] Re: merge of Akan and Twi Wikipedias

gt; ‫בתאריך יום ה׳, 23 במרץ 2023 ב-18:38 מאת ‪MF-Warburg‬‏ <‪ >> mfwarb...@googlemail.com‬‏>:‬ >> >>> Clearing out the inbox... Can I get a short confirmation that this is >>> still wanted? Then I will see to it that akwiki be closed. >>> >>> Am Do

[Langcom] Re: Closure of Wolof Wikiquote

I see this was already discussed. Heh! I'm proceeding. Am Mi., 30. Nov. 2022 um 13:05 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > As nobody has objected (I also do not object), I suggest going forward > with the closure (by "notifying the community and the Board"

[Langcom] Re: Suggested approval of Tyap Wikiquote

No objection. Pages look good! Am Fr., 31. März 2023 um 16:59 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > Correction: That should be Wiktionary, of course, not Wikiquote. > > fre. 31. mar. 2023 kl. 13:39 skrev Jon Harald Søby : > >> Hello all, >> >> I would like to suggest the approval of the Tyap Wikiquote

[Langcom] Closure of Wolof Wikiquote

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Wolof_Wikiquote_2 https://wo.wikiquote.org/wiki/Jagleel:Toutes_les_pages This wiki really is inactive and can be said to have an absence of content since the wiki's creation. In line with the comments on the request, I

[Langcom] Closure of cnwikimedia

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_cnwikimedia This closure should be uncontroversial. As with past cases like < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_nzwikimedia>, we can take action on it. For the future, it might be

[Langcom] Closure of Swedish Wikiversity

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Swedish_Wikiversity https://sv.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Huvudsida Users have already added a sitenotice that says Swedish Wikiversity is no longer active. I suggest to accept this as a "soft closure" as used to be done

[Langcom] Closure of Lak Wikipedia

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Lak_Wikipedia_3 https://lbe.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D0%B3%D1%8C%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BC%D1%83%D1%80_%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%BD This is basically the same situation as with Nauruan. Activity is non-existent and articles are

[Langcom] Closing proposal Nauruan Wikipedia

With one closing proposal (Akan Wikipedia) out of the way, I thought it would be a good moment to tackle the rest of them as well. So, I invite your comments (one mail will follow for each request): https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Nauruan_Wikipedia

[Langcom] Eligibility of Bajjika

A request has been made: < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Bajjika>. I think it is an uncontroversial case of eligibility: The language recently received an ISO 639-3 code, vjk, and usually we follow ISO 639-3 anyway. But I've also read the ISO change request

[Langcom] Re: Suggested approval of Gungbe Wikinews

Am Mo., 6. März 2023 um 14:56 Uhr schrieb Samuel Okepefi <9ja...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > Apologies for posting here. I just found out about this threads and I want > to address MF-Warburg concerns. > Thanks a lot for your reply! > > As far as I can tell, wikine

[Langcom] Re: merge of Akan and Twi Wikipedias

Clearing out the inbox... Can I get a short confirmation that this is still wanted? Then I will see to it that akwiki be closed. Am Do., 9. Juni 2022 um 17:53 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > I suggest proceeding according to the closing projects policy, i.

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of the Mossi Wikipedia

Activity-wise, this is ok, even though I am surprised there are only 193 articles. But those that exist look decent enough, even though I am surprised about some of the topics chosen over others. Thanks for seeking verification. No objection from me then. Am Di., 21. März 2023 um 12:32 Uhr

[Langcom] Re: Suggested approval of Banjar Wikiquote

other pages at all. Am Do., 16. März 2023 um 18:45 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby : > It seems like most pages are about proverbs. The content is not very > dissimilar from what you see if you use random page on the existing > Indonesian Wikiquote. > > tor. 16. mar. 2023 kl. 17:47 s

[Langcom] Re: Kabardian Wiktionary

Am Do., 16. März 2023 um 17:52 Uhr schrieb Jon Harald Søby >Why do you think we need extra verification of the content, MF-Warburg? There is already a Kabardian Wikipedia. Oops, wrong tab! Strike that. > ___ Langcom mailing list -- l

[Langcom] Re: Kabardian Wiktionary

I agree that it can be approved. In this month of March, there is only the perennial contributor so far, but at least there have been several other users in the past months, and this user's activity is very consistent. Verification of the content will be needed. Am Fr., 10. März 2023 um 13:20 Uhr

[Langcom] Re: Suggested approval of Banjar Wikiquote

Hello. I do object. I had a look at a random selection of (15) pages. Not one of them did contain more than one thing that was recognisable as a quote, if at all. Also, only 13 edits so far in this month by two contributors (and last month also only two contributors >10 edits). Am Fr., 10. März

[Langcom] Wiktionary Mandailing

I think < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_Mandailing> could be approved. What do you think? Translation of the most-used messages has recently been completed. Activity is continuous since October 2022. NB: This would need verification of the content, as no

[Langcom] Re: Central Kurdish Wiktionary - recommended approval

It's ok - maybe add "if there are no objections *from community members, based on the Language Proposal Policy*", for clarity of what could be objected. Amir E. Aharoni schrieb am Fr., 3. März 2023, 13:30: > Done. (Please check if it's correct—I don't do it often myself.) > > -- > Amir Elisha

[Langcom] Re: Central Kurdish Wiktionary - recommended approval

No objection from me. Does someone want to start the 7 days of announcement on Meta already? Jon Harald Søby schrieb am Do., 2. März 2023, 15:38: > I concur, they have had a good activity for quite some time. A little few > in some months, but many more other months, which is a natural

[Langcom] Re: Suggested approval of Gungbe Wikinews

Hello. I have some doubts. While the number of edits in the project is certainly impressive, this seems to be achieved by a tactic of doing extremely minor edits in order to create fairly short articles. There were four articles that were edited today, you can see it in all of them:

[Langcom] Min Nan aliases

We were requested to give input on < https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T230382>: "Remove aliases `minnan` and `zh-cfr` for the Min Nan Wikipedia". This concerns interwiki links only. Does anyone have any thoughts? Personally, I don't see what speaks against the removal, if these are unused.

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Wiktionary Gorontalo

No objection from me. Am So., 27. Nov. 2022 um 18:07 Uhr schrieb Satdeep Gill < satdeepg...@gmail.com>: > I support approval as well. > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2022, 10:00 PM Jan Wohlgemujth > wrote: > >> Am 2022-11-24 20:04, schrieb Jon Harald Søby: >> > I agree. Back in October, I suggested to the

[Langcom] Re: Closure of Wolof Wikiquote

As nobody has objected (I also do not object), I suggest going forward with the closure (by "notifying the community and the Board"). Am Di., 29. Nov. 2022 um 02:05 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki < sotiale...@gmail.com>: > Hi all. I'd like to hear your thoughts on this closure by 6 December. > >

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Sassarese Wikipedia

espite >> our tardiness, the activity level for Wp/sdc has remained good with 3–5 >> monthly active users since March. I would hate for the activity to "die >> out" because we are slow in making conclusions. >> >> lør. 26. mar. 2022 kl. 13:15 skrev MF-Warb

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of Amis Wikipedia

. 12:32 skrev Sotiale Wiki : > >> I am in favor of approval for Paiwan Wikipedia. They have demonstrated >> their continued contribution over the past 7 months. >> >> Regards, >> Sotiale >> >> 2021년 9월 15일 (수) 오후 10:15, MF-Warburg 님이 작성: >> >>>

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of Amis Wikipedia

I also propose to approve Paiwan Wikipedia, which is under similar circumstances. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Paiwan Am Mo., 13. Sept. 2021 um 15:21 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > Similar to Talysh, Amis Wikip

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of Manchu Wikipedia

A user has now given an answer there. @ Amir, since you - as I now see - have been talking to them on Incubator about the script converter issue, what do you think? Am So., 12. Sept. 2021 um 21:17 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > It's not super-clear to me what t

[Langcom] Re: Important: Transparency and policy gaps for Ancient Languages

None of this is leading anywhere. I suggest taking note of this useful comment: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Requests_for_comment/Start_allowing_ancient_languages#Topics_which_are_distractions_from_the_ask Am Di., 14. Sept. 2021 um 14:23 Uhr schrieb Jim Killock : > Thank you Gerard > >

[Langcom] Proposed approval of Amis Wikipedia

Similar to Talysh, Amis Wikipedia also is a longstanding project which I now propose to approve. < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Amis> In "strict terms", it is now in the 3rd month of activity, but continuous activity has been happening since the beginning of

[Langcom] Re: Important: Transparency and policy gaps for Ancient Languages

Am Mo., 13. Sept. 2021 um 13:44 Uhr schrieb Jim Killock : >However the policy has left a lot of unresolved problems, at least for the Latin project, and most likely for Sanskrit and Ancient Chinese, all of whom are disqualified from further progress. What is this supposed to mean? If these wikis

[Langcom] Re: Important: Transparency and policy gaps for Ancient Languages

(NB that this mail was sent in on Friday, I have approved it only now as a list admin, because I haven't been able to until now.) Am So., 12. Sept. 2021 um 21:46 Uhr schrieb Jim Killock : > While there may have been no requirements at the time to provide a rationale, people who feel the policy

[Langcom] Re: Update on Igbo Wiktionary Status in the incubator

Hello! I'm not sure what has been happening here. Currently, Igbo Wiktionary cannot be approved. The activity on Incubator is rather low (see < https://meta.toolforge.org/catanalysis/index.php?cat=0=Wt/ig=incubatorwiki>: 3 edits in this month, 30 edits in the last month. Normally we are looking

[Langcom] Proposed approval of Talysh Wikipedia

I would like to propose approving Talysh Wikipedia. All the relevant links, as usual, can be accessed from < https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Talysh >. This is a perennially active project on Incubator since 2012. The most-used messages are translated. There

[Langcom] Sindarin

I invite your thoughts: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Sindarin_2 ___ Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to langcom-le...@lists.wikimedia.org

[Langcom] Re: Proposed approval of Manchu Wikipedia

It's not super-clear to me what that means. Do they want a script converter? Am Sa., 28. Aug. 2021 um 14:09 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki < sotiale...@gmail.com>: > Hi. I don't know if this is a sufficient answer, but I asked them what > Amir had raised. > > >

[Langcom] Re: Request for comments on approval of Lombard Wiktionary

I think this can be approved. If there are no objections within 1-2 days, I will make the public announcement on Talk:Langcom. Am Mi., 25. Aug. 2021 um 13:20 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki < sotiale...@gmail.com>: > Hello, everyone. I hope you are staying safe. > > I would like to ask for comments on

[Langcom] Re: Request to revist Ancient Language policy

News from this RFC. The ultra-long discussion was archived by this user in favour of his new proposal, which already generated much text again. Am Di., 7. Sept. 2021 um 12:41 Uhr schrieb Jim Killock : > Dear LangCom, > > I am a sometime contributor to Latin Wikipedia, Latin Wikisource, and >

[Langcom] Re: Fw: [Wikipedia-l] Re: Old Norse?

This is because angwiki existed prior to the establishment of Langcom or the current language proposal policy (m:LPP). IIRC the latter explicitly says that some projects were created which today would not be approved anymore. Ben Salvidrim schrieb am Sa., 17. Juli 2021, 15:11: > Greetings

[Langcom] Re: Requesting approval for Javanese Wikisource

e Wikisource in Javanese should be created ASAP. > > בתאריך יום ה׳, 17 ביוני 2021, 23:24, מאת MF-Warburg ‏< > mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > >> Sooo... is there a problem with this? Is this some kind of elaborate joke? >> >> Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 20:43 Uhr

[Langcom] Re: Some housekeeping

Am Do., 1. Juli 2021 um 04:32 Uhr schrieb Kimberli Mäkäräinen < kimberli.makarai...@tuni.fi>: > Hei! Sorry for the long mail. > > Since the Northern Luri wp was closed, I think it would make sense to > reject the remaining Northern Luri proposal on meta: >

[Langcom] Re: Jambi Malay

Marked as eligible now. Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 17:45 Uhr schrieb MF-Warburg < mfwarb...@googlemail.com>: > Is this eligible? > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Jambi_Malay > It has an ISO 639-3 code, of course. >

[Langcom] Re: Requesting approval for Javanese Wikisource

s, >Gerard > > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 20:08, MF-Warburg wrote: > >> Yes, that's why by "resolved" I obviously mean they seem to exist now. >> >> Am Do., 17. Juni 2021 um 19:53 Uhr schrieb Gerard Meijssen < >> gerard.meijs...@gmail.c

[Langcom] Re: Requesting approval for Javanese Wikisource

ing as "resolved" when there is a need for them. > Thanks, >GerardM > > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 19:18, MF-Warburg wrote: > >> >> >> Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Nicolas VIGNERON < >> vigneron.nico...@gmail.com>: >> >&g

[Langcom] Re: Requesting approval for Javanese Wikisource

Am Di., 15. Juni 2021 um 19:37 Uhr schrieb Nicolas VIGNERON < vigneron.nico...@gmail.com>: > Hi y'all, > > Sure, done: I made a comment on > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikisource_Javanese#General_discussion > > That said, I would like to know where the members of

[Langcom] Jambi Malay

Is this eligible? https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Jambi_Malay It has an ISO 639-3 code, of course. Looking at Jan W. ;-) ___ Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Langcom] Re: Requesting approval for Javanese Wikisource

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Notification_about_proposed_approval_of_Javanese_Wikisource @ Nicolas: Would you be willing to contact the community and suggest the increased use of the proofread extension yourself? :-) Am Sa., 5. Juni 2021 um 11:55 Uhr schrieb Nicolas

[Langcom] Re: Wikipedia Basa Surabayaan (proposal for rejection)

Rejected. Am Sa., 29. Mai 2021 um 08:49 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki : > * related: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Basa_Surabayaan > > The reason is the same as the previous Kurdish dialect. The need to create > its own separate Wikipedia has not been proven,

[Langcom] Re: Approval of Dagbani Wikipedia

Excellent, thanks. Proceeding: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Notification_about_proposed_approval_of_Dagbani_Wikipedia Am Di., 1. Juni 2021 um 17:09 Uhr schrieb Amir E. Aharoni < amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il>: > Hi, > > I've just forwarded an expert confirmation to the

[Langcom] Re: Wikipedia Badini Kurdish (proposal for rejection)

Agreed. Am Sa., 29. Mai 2021 um 08:43 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki : > * related: > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wikipedia_Badini_Kurdish > > Hello. This appears to be a Kurdish dialect, and the need to create its > own separate Wikipedia has not been proven. And for

[Langcom] Re: Requesting Approval for Balinese Wikisource

I have made the public announcement: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Notification_about_proposed_approval_of_Balinese_Wikisource In this time, other members of Langcom can of course still comment, though they usually indicate their approval by noble silence. Am Sa., 29.

[Langcom] Re: Wiktionary Multimedia

Marked as rejected. Am Sa., 15. Mai 2021 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki : > Hello. > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_Multimedia > > It's a better request than the previous Wikipedia Emoji, but I still think > it's a separate matter whether we can

[Langcom] Name of the Lombard language

Please see https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Language_committee#Local_name_of_lombard_language and stuff linked from there. I forgot how / where to change the names. ___ Langcom mailing list -- langcom@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe send an email

[Langcom] Re: Middle English Wikipedia

ai 2021 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Gerard Meijssen < gerard.meijs...@gmail.com>: > Hoi, > Indeed. > Gerard > > On Thu, 6 May 2021 at 17:05, MF-Warburg wrote: > >> Some users who started a test-project on Incubator made a request: >> >> https://meta.wikimedia.

[Langcom] Re: Wiktionary Multimedia

Gerard has said it all already on the page. Reject. Am So., 16. Mai 2021 um 14:40 Uhr schrieb Sotiale Wiki : > There was a comment from the proposer regarding this proposal: > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Requests_for_new_languages/Wiktionary_Multimedia#Discussion > > I can't remember the

  1   2   3   4   >