Hello,
I'm new to this list so apologies if I am not allowed to comment here, etc.
I appreciate that at least this is moving forward and I would like to thank
MF-W for her willingness to take those requests up to discussion. I'd also
like to thank the whole LangCom for their work which I've
56 GMT+02:00 MarcoAurelio <strig...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I however would like to submit that I feel that in the case of
>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Deletion_of_Afar_Wikipedia,_Wikibooks_and_Wiktionary>
>> we could at leas
Waste of time to discuss with who do not want to listen tonanything but
their own stories. Suggest speedy closure of the proposal and I'd even
consider a block on him at Meta. His only edits so far in Meta have been
adding huge piles of garbage at the talk page of the closed global ban
request for
Hola,
WRT a global ban, as suggested by Maor X, that was already attempted (not
on my PC, cannot link sorry). However it didn't succeed, partly because it
may have been poorly argumented and it was started by person who was seen
as too involved with him IMHO. On the other hand Marrovi clogged
I do not think the project meets the criteria for closing, but I think that
the vast majority of the bot articles are unworthy and that the LangCom
should suggest that you will not consider that kind of one line bot created
articles as “content” in the future. This kind of *articlecountitis* is
Dear LangCom:
Pursuant the closing projects proposal and considering the request to close
xalwiki made in bad faith and disruptive, I went ahead and closed <
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Kalmyk_Wikipedia>
as rejected. As per policy, a LangCom member
Sounds sensible to me. If the wiki do not exist anymore, there is no point
in keeping links to nonexistent projects. But how would you remove them?
Doing so by hand would be tedious. Maintenance script or bot would be
better. Regards, M.
El El vie, 9 feb 2018 a las 15:52, Amir E. Aharoni <
nt of work done by Steven he has considerable room to maneuver. So
> no, I do not agree with your legalistic point of view.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
> On 10 April 2018 at 22:28, MarcoAurelio <strig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Again, Steven (not a LangCom
o *reject* the proposal for
> closure. I didn't oppose Steven's proposal as I was happy to keep it open.
>
> Fwiw,
> Oliver
>
> On 10-Apr-18 18:40, MarcoAurelio wrote:
>
> If so there has been unanimous consensus to close, as Gerard supported and
> no one opposed. Thanks,
Hi,
>
> Rejecting request to close Malagasy Wikibooks—comment by only one LangCom
member is not sufficient to constitute consensus to close a project that
has no violatons of fundamental rules
>
Sorry but I find this rather innapropriate and contrary to LangCom voting
rules as stated at: <
Hello,
Actually the policy allows closing projects "which don't have content or
existing content is insignificant" (type one). In this case, mgwikibooks
falls under that clause totally in my opinion:
- only one editor has been somewhat active there for 10 years and has not
really objected to the
Issue is that we're serving a project for just 15 pages. I'd argue that is,
indeed, absence of content since the wiki creation. Combined with no users
interested in the project, etc., the best we can do, IMHO, is to lock the
project and return it back to Incubator. Respectfully submitted, MA.
different from having it moved to Incubator.. I
> do not object to the project being locked.
> Thanks,
> Gerard
>
> On 21 March 2018 at 14:39, MarcoAurelio <strig...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Issue is that we're serving a project for just 15 pages. I'd argue that
>&
13 matches
Mail list logo
