W dniu 2014-02-25 15:57, Daniel Naber pisze:
> On 2014-02-25 10:47, Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
>
>> The only drawback is that we would store the antipatterns separately
>> from the rules for which they apply but,
>
> I think this is a problem... I also want the source code to be simple,
> but consider
On 2014-02-25 10:47, Marcin Miłkowski wrote:
> The only drawback is that we would store the antipatterns separately
> from the rules for which they apply but,
I think this is a problem... I also want the source code to be simple,
but considering we have 10,000 rules or so, we shouldn't accept th
Hi all,
I have a simple idea how to implement anti-patterns that we talked about
earlier on this list (see
http://wiki.languagetool.org/xml-pattern-rule-extensions). The idea is
to extend the current immunization by adding a simple parameter: a list
of rule IDs, for which the immunization is s
