Re: Problem creating rule

2016-02-16 Thread Marco A.G.Pinto
Thank you my friend, I have committed the grammar.xml with the improvements. Kind regards, >Marco A.G.Pinto --- On 16/02/2016 20:01, Yakov Reztsov wrote: Hello Marco, Problem of this rule that word * "bonita" is not match to "<*token postag_regexp="yes" postag

Re: Problem creating rule

2016-02-16 Thread Yakov Reztsov
Hello Marco, Problem of this rule that word   "bonita" is not match to "< token postag_regexp="yes" postag="AQ0CS0|PI0FS000|PI0MS000|NCMS000"> " You can exchange postag "NCMS000"  and " NCFS000" on  second token like this: I think this rules may look like this:                  

Re: Problem creating rule

2016-02-16 Thread Yakov Reztsov
Hello Marco, Problem of this rule that word   "bonita" is not match to "< token postag_regexp="yes" postag="AQ0CS0|PI0FS000|PI0MS000|NCMS000"> " You can add postag "NCMS000" to second token like this: uma a Erro de concordância uma/um. um Quero uma bonito carro novo. >Вторник, 16 февра