Yes, the rule would be useful.
Aside. The rule I_MOVING finds some related problems:
Finds: I as walking.
Finds: I as eating.
Does not find: He as smiling.
Does not find: I as calling.
The disambiguator log shows that for the 2 sentences that I_MOVING does not
find, the disambiguator uses rule AS_NOT_ADVERB[1], which correctly removes the
reading RB from 'as'. I would like to refine the rule AS_NOT_ADVERB to remove
the reading RB from 'as' in the first 2 sentences. (But, I don't have the time
to look at the problem now.)
Regards,
Mike Unwalla
Contact: www.techscribe.co.uk/techw/contact.htm
-Original Message-
From: Marco A.G.Pinto [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 17 August 2016 00:45
To: Mailing List - LanguageTool
Subject: Possible English rule
Hello!
I typed this on IRC hours ago:
[22:13] just to tell you: before leaving to bed I found out an
error in my course project... I as calling a function using -F instead of +F
We could add a rule:
I + AS + VERBGERUND -> I + WAS + VERBGERUND
Is it a good rule?
Thanks!
Kind regards,
>Marco A.G.Pinto
---
--
--
___
Languagetool-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/languagetool-devel
