Hi Roy,
It seems that I wasn't clear. Lets give an example.
I have a machine with a single ethernet interface, with two IP addresses
A and B. This is done using two virtual interfaces.
A is my IP address in ISP-A. B is my IP address in ISP-B. The physical
line to ISP-A is 1.5Mbps. The physical
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As stated by your message, I'll try it again on the mailing list..
I tried your wondershaper today and there is one thing I am puzzling
about. If I add port 80 and 21 like this
NOPRIOPORTSRC='80 21'
The uploads from my webserver and ftp server are a
On Tuesday 06 Jan 2004 01:49, Rio Martin wrote:
Hmm. Just replace -j MASQUERADE with -j SNAT? Will that not break
other things?
-j SNAT your_ip
Or rather -j SNAT --to-source your_ip. I get it. I'll check if that
works better than masquerading.
Just tried it - no
Le mar 06/01/2004 à 16:53, andybr a écrit :
Hi all,
The ftp uses dynamic ports in source not in destiny so
it is possible mark ftp traffic and shape.
Use CONNMARK to mark packet it put the same MARK on all the packet of
the connection. So mark follow any non-linear protocol recognized by
Hello Patrick,
Please excuse my suggestion if you have already considered the issue I
indicate below from Stef's FAQ.
: I have measured the performance of HTB with iperf and found it to be
: very close to expected (i.e., within 5%). I have a colleague who is
: measuring the performance by
This is, of course, very valuable feedback. Unfortunately, given the
responses I've had so far, I see that I didn't make it clear what I'm really
looking for.
I believe that my colleague's test methodology is flawed. I believe that you
cannot generate reliable bandwidth measurements by ftp'ing
On Sunday 04 January 2004 5:33 pm, Roy wrote:
I have read about people having lots of problems with IMQ. So I just
wanted to
try it and see how stable it is on my box. I gather it could actually
be problems with the Kernel and not the IMQ code??
That is possible but prpbably not
Hi,Here
I am trying something simple.My objective is to make ip rule fwmark command
work :)Network Diagram:--- 192.168.250.197 (eth0) Linux Box (eth1)
192.168.8.88 -192.168.8.122 (eth0) Windows XP
ClientConfiguration done on Linux Box:-(1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] webauth]#
iptables
Hello,
for the umpteen time Patrick Turley [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
eom
Too bad this wasn't on the, then I could set by watch to it.
Steve
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:
