Hi,
Not sure if this is the right mailing list for this but its kinda on topic.
Apparently our ISP has assinged 8 static IP addresses to us, A network IP
address, a route ip address and 5 user ip addresses. Now they supplied us
with a router with 5 ports on, each one of the ports would assign
Hi,
Is there any way by which we can shape domain name(not by IP address)
Eg : suppose i want to shape tarrif to a particular domain www.xyz.com which has
multiple ips and i am not aware of there ips
how can we do that.
Regards
Jayesh
-
Still
Hi all,
I have a dual stacked (IPv4/IPv6) Linux host (S) with two interfaces that can both be
used to reach a destination (D) and are both up. In order to make sure a packet is
transmitted over the correct interface I use policy based routing to choose the
correct routing table based on the IP
Hi.
jayesh rathod wrote:
Is there any way by which we can shape domain name(not by IP address)
Eg : suppose i want to shape tarrif to a particular domain www.xyz.com
which has multiple ips and i am not aware of there ips
You could achieve this by using different firewall marks for the
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
Not sure if this is the right mailing list for this but its kinda on
topic.
It is ADVANCED routing; you have a simple configuration issue, so I hope
you posted more than just here.
we've installed a linux machine which load balances 2 adsl lines. The
You left out
On Friday 07 May 2004 15:37, Michael Renzmann wrote:
Hi.
jayesh rathod wrote:
Is there any way by which we can shape domain name(not by IP address)
Eg : suppose i want to shape tarrif to a particular domain www.xyz.com
which has multiple ips and i am not aware of there ips
You could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our system sets up multiple connections. At times, packets can be transmitted for some connections but not others.
With that in mind:
1. Is it possible to have multiple output queues in a qdisc,
rather than one?
2. Can a packet that leaves qdisc be returned to qdisc
Something I've found with mldonkey, if you're running with
Overnet enabled, is
it likes to use tons of ports, so simply specifying 4662 for
the Edonkey
hm, I've disabled overnet now, but imap is still very slow. Http on the
other hand is very usable (there's also a proxy on said machine)