Andy Furniss wrote:
Saying that I did notice that HTB was dropping -
maybe the default queue length is shorter now? It does seem a bit
strange though, I see drops where I expect the queue to be long enough
for my rwin and a class with two tcps on the go had less drops than one
with one -
Hello list,
I'm having a little trouble imagining a setup I'll soon have.
I am in the process of getting a routed /28 to my homeLAN. What I want
to do is to put a linux box in front of the lan to filter some of the
unneeded and potential dangerous ports. Now the box has 2 nics, one for
the
What I do is have the linux box claim all of the public IPs as its own, and
then use IPTABLES to DNAT/SNAT to/from private IPs as needed. You can
dedicate a public IP to a specific private IP, so the computer on your
network with that private IP appears to all of the world as if it actually
On Sunday 31 October 2004 16:55, Rene Gallati wrote:
Hello list,
I'm having a little trouble imagining a setup I'll soon have.
I am in the process of getting a routed /28 to my homeLAN. What I want
to do is to put a linux box in front of the lan to filter some of the
unneeded and potential
On Saturday 30 October 2004 23:13, Avidianto Widodo wrote:
Hi,
How can I configure shaping bandwidth on htb/cbq without delay or latency?
Please give some example.
You can not shape without delay or latency. You can only try to minimize the
delay or latency for certain connections.
Stef
--
Minimize having a good CPU...every thing that travels lost some
time...even in the wire or in the air :) or in the vacum the
comunications with the MARS have biig delays :)
Stef Coene wrote:
On Saturday 30 October 2004 23:13, Avidianto Widodo wrote:
Hi,
How can I configure shaping
Rene Gallati wrote:
Hello list,
I'm having a little trouble imagining a setup I'll soon have.
I am in the process of getting a routed /28 to my homeLAN. What I want
to do is to put a linux box in front of the lan to filter some of the
unneeded and potential dangerous ports. Now the box
