[LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

2007-11-04 Thread Fog_Watch
G'Day I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write. HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. In order for this to

Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

2007-11-04 Thread Gustavo Homem
On Sunday 04 November 2007 12:04, Fog_Watch wrote: G'Day I would like to be able to use my VOIP telephone over a saturated ADSL link whilst enjoying optimum audio quality and utilising all of the bandwidth I pay for. It is about this situation that I write. HFSC appears to be the queueing

Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

2007-11-04 Thread Giovanni Bajo
On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote: HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. Is it? Any pointers? -- Giovanni Bajo ___ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Re: [LARTC] Bridging two subnets selectively using routing

2007-11-04 Thread Grant Taylor
On 11/2/2007 11:35 PM, Corey Hickey wrote: I meant to do both, which I think is necessary in order to make the OPs proposed scheme work without modification. I'll defer if I'm wrong, though--I haven't tested it, and, as you said in your other email, it's a very weird scenario. As long as

Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

2007-11-04 Thread Michal Soltys
Giovanni Bajo wrote: On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote: HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. Is it? Any pointers? Well, it can decouple bandwidth and delay. And both are important here. Some documentation pointers:

Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

2007-11-04 Thread Ian
On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 15:34:07 +0100 Giovanni Bajo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On dom, 2007-11-04 at 23:04 +1100, Fog_Watch wrote: HFSC appears to be the queueing discipline of choice for VOIP. Is it? Any pointers? I was going on gut instinct from vague information I read cruising around.

Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

2007-11-04 Thread Fog_Watch
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:46:37 + Gustavo Homem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't use Shorewall, but rather an iptables script which works for most scenarios: No disrespect, but that sounds too scary for me. I feel more comfortable if something like Shorewall is holding my hand. That is, start

Re: [LARTC] HFSC and that ATM overhead problem (Another VOIP QoS post. Ahhhh)

2007-11-04 Thread Gustavo Homem
On Sunday 04 November 2007 23:16, Fog_Watch wrote: On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:46:37 + Gustavo Homem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't use Shorewall, but rather an iptables script which works for most scenarios: No disrespect, but that sounds too scary for me. I feel more comfortable if