Re: [LARTC] Latency low enough for gaming

2004-02-19 Thread Andy Furniss
Patrick Petersen wrote: Welcome to me, and my very first lartc post. As with most first timers, i made a mistake. Admin, disregard the earlier message, as i was still waiting for the subscription confirmation. Should it get through still, i apoligize. For the last few weeks i have been trying to

Re: [LARTC] Latency low enough for gaming

2004-02-19 Thread Patrick Petersen
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:45:16 +, Andy Furniss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The delete rule for iptabled needs -D not -A. Yes, that one was bad. I noticed it when i discovered how to list rules in chains... I think all my rules was there about 10 times each, since i never removed anything :)

Re: [LARTC] Latency low enough for gaming

2004-02-18 Thread Patrick Petersen
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 05:34:20 +0200, Nuutti Kotivuori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let's get the problem statement clear first. [snip - lots of tcp] What can be done to improve the situation then? [SNIP - more info and advice] I think this is where it breaks for me. The solution looks to be

[LARTC] Latency low enough for gaming

2004-02-11 Thread Patrick Petersen
Welcome to me, and my very first lartc post. As with most first timers, i made a mistake. Admin, disregard the earlier message, as i was still waiting for the subscription confirmation. Should it get through still, i apoligize. For the last few weeks i have been trying to make it so our 2048/512