Re: [LARTC] prio bands and ignored priomap when any tc filter is present

2007-08-28 Thread Michal Soltys
Javier Ors wrote: I'm not sure but I think that you have to choose either to use the priomap, or to use only the filters. I have also notice this problem, if you set a filter for only one kind of traffic the rest of it ends in some random band. Ok, thanks for confirmation. Anyway, the

Re: [LARTC] prio bands and ignored priomap when any tc filter is present

2007-08-28 Thread Javier Ors
Really, I only understood what the *priorities* of the priomap were until I read this other document from him: http://ace-host.stuart.id.au/russell/files/tc/doc/tc/priority.txt The document I prepared was just an alternative for the priomap section of the howto based on this information, the only

[LARTC] prio bands and ignored priomap when any tc filter is present

2007-08-27 Thread Michal Soltys
Today I've noticed a bit strange (?) behaviour when prio qdisc is used. Example (having no filters/qdisc/etc. at the start) : Add simple 9 bands qdisc, set each mapping to lowest priority band: tc qdisc add dev $eth root handle 1: prio bands 9 priomap 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 If I do