[LARTC] SQUID zero penalty for HIT trraffic patch

Hi, I was reviewing the patch Patrick McHardy has contributed to squid QoS features (http://trash.net/~kaber/squid-qos/), and decided to do something similar which could classify client side traffic based on whether SQUID's response is a cache HIT or a cache MISS. I think I got it working. I made

[LARTC] SQUID- cache Zero Penalty Hit patch - new revision available !

ALOHA to all readers ! I have released a new version of the Zero Penalty Hit patch for SQUID caching engine (ZPH). Now it is possible to mark HIT packets leaving the proxy with an IP option - this means the packets can later be classified on the SQUID engine machine itself (via a simple tc

[LARTC] SQUID + HTB

Hi. You will probably benefit from this SQUID patch. It can be used to mark, and then classify packets generated by the SQUID caching engine based on wheather they are served from the cache (HIT) or being retrieved now (MISS). More info on: http://www.it-academy.bg/zph/ You can do this when TC

[LARTC] Any NISTNet alternative or fix ?

Hi, I need to simulate (with a certain degree of control) common WAN problems like packet loss/duplication, delay and conditions of limited bandwidth. I found that NISTNet is what i need, but it seems the package has not been updated since October, 2000. This is not really a problem as I

[LARTC] Frottle + Bridge + IMQ

Hi, I'm trying to configure IMQ to work on the same machine with frottle (http://frottle.sourceforge.net). The problem is both feed themselves packets through netfilter queueing mechanism, but currently there can only be one netfilter queue per protocol family. To explain why I need IMQ in the

Re: Re: [LARTC] Frottle + Bridge + IMQ

Hi, Thanks for the response, Ed. It seems I have not been clear enough. Forget about frottle, currently the problem is much simpler. I have two NICs in a bridge (which is router's LAN interface) and another NIC which is the WAN. The upstream can be easily controlled with an egress qdisc set on

RE: [LARTC] Frottle + Bridge + IMQ

Hi, I do not have much of experience with frottle, but the project is well documented and my configuration is almost exact copy of the default one: This are non-commented lines from my master's /etc/frottle.conf: mastermode 1 clientmode 1 daemon 1 masterip 10.0.0.249 queuesize 100 hiports