Re: [LARTC] Consider r2q change

2005-10-20 Thread Lee Sanders
You really should search the list archives. This question has been asked a 
dozen times in the last year.

Google also turned this up quite quickly.
http://www.docum.org/docum.org/faq/cache/31.html

To copy and paste some previous answers from the list. You will need to sort 
these yourself.

It is documented in HTB manual. The complaint was not displayed
before and sharing was silently wrong.
Quantum of leaf should be between 1500 and 6 and it is computed
as rate/r2q (or can be supplied independly).
So that if your maximal leaf rate is 1Mbit (12Bps) then r2q
should be 3. If max rate is 10kbit (1200Bps) then r2q should be 1.
It is warning only and will not affect functionality, only precision.
devik

Smallest rate : 16kbit = 2 kilobyt / r2q (=10) = 200.  And this is < 1500.  So 
you get warnings.
Biggest rate : 100mbit = 12.5 mbyte / r2q = 1.2 Mbyte > 60.000.  So you get 
warnings.  

If you do
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 10 r2q 1
Smallest rate : 16kbit = 2kilobyte / r2k = 2000.  And this is > 1500.  So no 
warnings.
Biggest rate : 100mbit = 12.5 mbyte / r2q = 12.5 Mbyte > 60.000.  So you get 
warnings.  But you can overrule the quantum :
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 128kbit burst 2k 
quantum 6

Quantum is used when 2 classes are getting more bandwidth then the rate.   So 
it's only important for sharing the remaining bandwidth.  In that case, each 
class may send quantum bytes.


If I understand the source, that message occours when you have a leaf 
class whose calculated quantum (rate/r2q) is less than 1000 byte and the 
kernel set the quantum to 1000 byte.
I've read that the quantum should be bigger than the MTU so I don't 
understand why the kernel don't use a minimum quantum value bigger than 
1500. Someone has a clue?

 From kernel-source-2.6.10/net/sched/sch_htb.c
if (!hopt->quantum && cl->un.leaf.quantum < 1000) {
    printk(KERN_WARNING "HTB: quantum of class %X is small. Consider r2q 
change.\n", cl->classid);
    cl->un.leaf.quantum = 1000;


I hope this helps.



Regards,
Lee

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:12 pm, James Lista wrote:
> nsider r2q change.
> HTB: quantum of class 10002 is big. Consider r2q change.
> HTB: quantum of class 10030 is small. Consider r2q change.
> HTB: quantum of class 10031 is small. Consider r2q change.
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


Re: [LARTC] Consider r2q change

2005-10-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Lista ha scritto:
> Buddies,
> 
> When I run my HTB script it says the below message with "dmesg"
> what does that mean ?
> HTB: quantum of class 10001 is big. Consider r2q change.

The kernel calculate the quantum using rate / r2q (rate to quantum)
which have a default value of 10. If the calculated value is less than
1000 then the quantum will have a value of 1000 and you get the message
you posted.
You should have a quantum value bigger than your MTU.


-- 
**
Marco Innocenti  Gruppo Infrastruttura e Sicurezza
CINECA   phone:+39 0516171553 / fax:+39 0516132198
Via Magnanelli 6/3   e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
40033 Casalecchio di RenoBologna (Italia)
**
___
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc


Re: [LARTC] Consider r2q change, why !?

2004-06-13 Thread Clifford Payne




A little bit of searching brings up this page:
http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/faq/cache/31.html

I hope that helps,
Cliff

Yacine wrote:

  
  
  
  Hi,
  
My system always complain with the warning below :
HTB: quantum of class 10099 is small. Consider r2q change.
...
Thanks,
Yacine.
  



___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/