Yes. Thank you very much for the answer. As I wrote before, we are planning to use latex2html for our corporation documents. And I'm building something to control user access, using a rewrite rule at apache conf as you've mentioned before. The problem is that we use a framework built in php to develop our sites. This framework expect template archives with extensions ".tpt". Actually I'm trying to see all possibilities to see which one is better. I prefer not to change the latex2html. If I decide to change it, I will not distribute as latex2html distribution.
Thanks again, Joao. Em Ter, 2003-02-04 ąs 01:58, Ross Moore escreveu: > > Is there a simple way to change output HTMLs extensions? > > Yes. > > To get .htm (e.g. for multi-platform compatibility on CDROMs) > simply set $SHORTEXTN = 1; in the .latex2html-init file, > or use the -short_extn switch. > > To get .shtml then set $ALLOW_SSI = 1; in the init file. > To get .php then set $ALLOW_PHP = 1; in the init file. > > For anything else, you will need to look at the latex2html script > and find where it sets the value of $EXTN after checking > for the above variables. > > You could add a line of code to the the extension to anything else > that you like, but there is a risk that some hyperlinking may fail > in complicated documents (e.g. with frames) where there may be > an assumption that the extension will be either .htm or .html . > So if you do such hacking, please do not distribute it to others > as a latex2html distribution. > Also, I'd like to know the motivation behind such a change. > > > Hope this helps, > > Ross Moore > > > > > > Thanks, > > Joao. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > latex2html mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html _______________________________________________ latex2html mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/latex2html