Re: [l2h] Minor installation problem (2K.1beta)

2001-03-23 Thread Graham Gough
> "RM" == Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RM> so it could be that the interpolation of @ICONPATH@ isn't RM> working properly. I've found it, I think. I believe the `problem' (if there is one) is in the following lines in config.pl. $newcfg{'ICONPATH'} = $opt{'ICONPATH'} || $c

Re: [l2h] Minor installation problem (2K.1beta)

2001-03-22 Thread Ross Moore
> > "RM" == Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RM> No. ICONPATH and ICONSERVER are completely independent bits > RM> of information. > > I find it difficult to believe that Ross is wrong, but this is at > variance to what the file prefs.pm says:- Oops; don't you believe it

Re: [l2h] Minor installation problem (2K.1beta)

2001-03-22 Thread Graham Gough
> "RM" == Ross Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RM> No. ICONPATH and ICONSERVER are completely independent bits RM> of information. RM> ICONSERVER is the http path to be used for absolute links to RM> icons from within your HTML pages. RM> ICONPATH is the location in y

Re: [l2h] Minor installation problem (2K.1beta)

2001-03-21 Thread Ross Moore
> Just trying out 2k.1beta. I edited prefs.pm, including the value of > $prefs{'ICONPATH'} > > I ran configure and make and expected this change to be reflected in the > value of $ICONSERVER in the generated l2hconf.pm, but it wasn't. This > appears to me to be a bug. No. ICONPATH and ICONSERVER

[l2h] Minor installation problem (2K.1beta)

2001-03-21 Thread Graham Gough
Just trying out 2k.1beta. I edited prefs.pm, including the value of $prefs{'ICONPATH'} I ran configure and make and expected this change to be reflected in the value of $ICONSERVER in the generated l2hconf.pm, but it wasn't. This appears to me to be a bug. Graham