There is a problem with this function. To avoid recursion there is a
hack there to point BackTraceStrFunc to system implementation (which
only shows addresses in hex).Long back trace which mostly ends with
incorrect frame address as I suppose (OpenStabs is returning false for
nil address) -
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com wrote:
As a general issue, IMO the Discussion section of git-tag manpage
summarizes the case for correct tag usage very nicely ;-)
And more importantly - in Git, a 'tag' is very different to a 'branch'. ;-)
Regards,
-
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Vincent Snijders
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so what is written about how to use tags with doesn't apply to
svn, because with SVN a tag is not very different at all to a branch.
;-)
:-) I've only been using Git for 2-3 months (1.5 months actively).
En/na svaa ha escrit:
My complain was that when Dians asked about how to read a text file,
the right answer should had been showing both ways.
Note that both require exclusive access to the file. If you want shared
access (e.g. to read a file that some other process has open for
writing,
Op dinsdag 14-04-2009 om 12:35 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Hans-Peter
Diettrich:
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Yes, but beware the some of them got merges from trunk afterwards.
For instance, lazarus_0_9_26_2 is based on 18716, and r18269 got merged
resulting in r18898. So you cannot
2009/4/15 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
ps: Releasing a fpc release costs more then 4 months! FOUR MONTHS! And
still we had to cancel the release on the day of the planned release.
How did this thread
Bogusław Brandys пишет:
There is a problem with this function. To avoid recursion there is a
hack there to point BackTraceStrFunc to system implementation (which
only shows addresses in hex).Long back trace which mostly ends with
incorrect frame address as I suppose (OpenStabs is returning
Zitat von Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com:
2009/4/15 Mattias Gärtner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
Zitat von Alexander Klenin kle...@gmail.com:
Additionally, many makefiles also get modified.
Can you both provide more details to reproduce?
Hm, I did a clean rebuild if recent SVN and
Op dinsdag 14-04-2009 om 16:06 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Graeme
Geldenhuys:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Florian Klaempfl
flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
And what if someone realizes that one patch is missing?
Well, is that not what release canditate or stable branches are for?
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
ps: Releasing a fpc release costs more then 4 months! FOUR MONTHS! And
still we had to cancel the release on the day of the planned release.
How did this thread become all about FPC releases??? This is the
Lazarus
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Vincent Snijders
vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, so what is written about how to use tags with doesn't apply to
svn, because with SVN a tag is not very different at all to a branch.
;-)
:-) I've only been using Git for 2-3
Hi,
I've been playing with new Git commands again and found this cool
little one. It outputs the number of commits done by all users in the
Lazarus repository. I guess it's kinda pointless since the numbers do
not fully reflect all contributors. Patches submitted to Mantis is
applied by other
http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Spaced-Out.aspx
This is why we don't hire VB programmers!!! :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit
http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/
Op woensdag 15-04-2009 om 11:25 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Graeme
Geldenhuys:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
ps: Releasing a fpc release costs more then 4 months! FOUR MONTHS! And
still we had to cancel the release on the day of the planned
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 03:25:10PM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Vincent Snijders
vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl wrote:
I am abusing the tool, because it is a tool after all, not a law. Sorry to
confuse
you with it, but I never realized you would get into
2009/4/15, Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com:
Let's play it straight: there's no _need_ for moving tags.
Yes, it can be convenient, but you'll shooting yourself in the foot no
matter if it's how private you make it.
I think I have to shoot myself in the foot before I give up this
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
It's one of the very first points in the SVN book (iirc differences to CVS),
that branches and tags are the same.
and then you read between the lines design flaw! ;-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
2009/4/15 Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com:
As I said previously (and was completely ignored ;-), with SVN one can
rely on repository revisions.
And if people don't like that, they can use a series of pre tags.
And probably a pre branch.
Brilliant idea. Create a pre-0.9.26 branch (or
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
The whole git-stuff is off-topic. Most people here don't care.
I've setup a Git mirror of Lazarus SubVersion repository. It's got
everything to do with Lazarus development. And yes most people don't
care yet, because the
Vincent Snijders schrieb:
2009/4/15, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
2009/4/15 Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com:
As I said previously (and was completely ignored ;-), with SVN one can
rely on repository revisions.
And if people don't like that, they can use a series
2009/4/15, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
2009/4/15 Flávio Etrusco flavio.etru...@gmail.com:
As I said previously (and was completely ignored ;-), with SVN one can
rely on repository revisions.
And if people don't like that, they can use a series of pre tags.
And
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 00:02, Florian Klaempfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Very difficult. If a release is created from a branch, nobody can ensure
that all release builders built the release candidate from exactly the
same revision, if they don't, things might be broken when the final
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Florian Klaempfl
flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
start the release process. 2-4 months later if anything is broken,
merge and patch that branch at will. Test again
Did you ever working on testing a lazarus or fpc release?
Do you mean... have I tested a release
Alexander Klenin schrieb:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 00:02, Florian Klaempfl flor...@freepascal.org
wrote:
Very difficult. If a release is created from a branch, nobody can ensure
that all release builders built the release candidate from exactly the
same revision, if they don't, things might
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Florian Klaempfl
flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
start the release process. 2-4 months later if anything is broken,
merge and patch that branch at will. Test again
Did you ever working on testing a lazarus or fpc release?
Do you
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 00:02, Florian Klaempfl flor...@freepascal.org wrote:
Very difficult. If a release is created from a branch, nobody can ensure
that all release builders built the release candidate from exactly the
same revision, if they don't, things might be broken when the final
And here is the best comment about it:
Capt. Kirk:
As a customer your choices are:
1. Hire an experienced competent developer who understands the library
functions, knows how to write properly structured code with
appropriate variable scope and data types, or
2. Hire someone who will produce
What
No. This is not my problems!
I can use my models (forms ancestors / VFI); My problems is with IDE
Menu: No IDE:menu:new:inherited component options for my forms on my
package.
And i don't see how can i put forms/datamodules from my package in
autoCreate statement of my project!
Em Ter,
--- El mar 14-abr-09, Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl escribió:
De:: Vincent Snijders vsnijd...@vodafonevast.nl
Asunto: Re: [Lazarus] Modified .po files after each build
A: General mailing list lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
Fecha: martes, 14 abril, 2009, 2:44 pm
Graeme
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ha scritto:
And here is the best comment about it:
Capt. Kirk:
As a customer your choices are:
1. Hire an experienced competent developer who understands the library
functions, knows how to write properly structured code with
appropriate variable scope and
Giuliano Colla wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ha scritto:
And here is the best comment about it:
Capt. Kirk:
As a customer your choices are:
1. Hire an experienced competent developer who understands the library
functions, knows how to write properly structured code with
Dear sirs:
where can I found something about the po files?
thanks very much
Ing. Héctor F. Fiandor
hfian...@infomed.sld.cu
---
Red Telematica de Salud - Cuba
CNICM - Infomed
___
Lazarus mailing list
Martin Friebe ha scritto:
Giuliano Colla wrote:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ha scritto:
And here is the best comment about it:
Capt. Kirk:
As a customer your choices are:
1. Hire an experienced competent developer who understands the library
functions, knows how to write properly
Hi,
I'm still having trouble using GTK or GTK2 when running Window Maker
(http://www.windowmaker.info/). Every time virtual desktops are switched
lazarus itself and any application built with it are minimized.
Is this a known bug?
Where in the LCL is the handling of window manager events?
And here is the best comment about it:
The funniest comment about it:
VB is the garbage collector: you type in your code and... there you
have it, the garbage!
--
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
Lazarus mailing list
http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Spaced-Out.aspx
This is why we don't hire VB programmers!!! :-)
Well, to me it seems the problem is with the programmer. I have seen a
Java and also a Delphi programmer write similar code as the article
mentioned. Though such kind of programmer is more common in
36 matches
Mail list logo
