2009/2/16 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
I have a feeling something got lost in the translation from Portuguese
to English or from English to Dutch in the next paragraph, because I
don't understand your point.
Basically he said he was very disappointed by the Linux Lazarus 0.9.26
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys
graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Why jump in quality? Isn't the current LCL-Qt based on Qt 4.x The
Qt 4.5 release will only make it more usable in a open-source /
closed-source (licensing) term - that has nothing to do with quality.
I meant
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Paul Ishenin webpi...@mail.ru wrote:
What are you comparing? LCL interfaces to qt and gtk or qt and gtk themself?
I suppose the first.
I am comparing qt and gtk themselves. The example goes around lazarus,
but only because the only qt or gtk software that I
