2009/1/23 Reenen Laurie rlau...@gmail.com:
But doing some more basic stuff... I dunno, like scrolling in firefox on
a
window with some flash, javascript etc. is slow and sluggish.
Oh yes! This one drives me nuts! I don't know what causes it, but
yes, Firefox is sometimes dog slow when
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:11 PM, c...@freemail.hu wrote:
The main reason Linux is becoming important for us is to target small
companies where price matters a lot. This far I thought that Linux would be
superior to XP possibly even with weaker machines.
The exact reason our company is
En/na Graeme Geldenhuys ha escrit:
I definitely don't think it's the X architecture, but rather the bloat
in the desktop environments like Gnome and KDE. I often test the fpGUI
Toolkit on various DE's and Window Managers. I have about 7 different
Window Managers installed on my system. Most
Le mercredi 21 janvier 2009 à 15:42 +0100, c...@freemail.hu a écrit :
Celeron 1700 CPU, 512MB RAM, 200GB HDD (10 GB for Ubuntu), Integrated
Video, but I think it should be decent enough for running Linux. There was
Intel integrated video? There's big issues with (all?) Intel integrated,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Luca Olivetti l...@wetron.es wrote:
Probably because they're doing a lot less than Gnome/KDE?
That's true, but is all that extra fluff really needed! I also
think many developers are becoming sloppy with their programming.
There is no excuse for inefficient
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote:
En/na Graeme Geldenhuys ha escrit:
I definitely don't think it's the X architecture, but rather the bloat
in the desktop environments like Gnome and KDE. I often test the fpGUI
Toolkit on various DE's and Window Managers. I
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
Probably yes, but combined with the fact that those teams seem to be more
interested in developing yet another new internal architecture every two
years rather than optimize the current one.
That is exactly the kind
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
I definitely don't think it's the X architecture, but rather the bloat
in the desktop environments like Gnome and KDE.
IMO Vista introduces an similar bloat to the GUI, and I don't find it
slow, on my machine (one year old, dual core...), neather native nor in
a
Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Probably yes, but combined with the fact that those teams seem to be more
interested in developing yet another new internal architecture every two
years rather than optimize the current one.
That is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. Optimization is
Thanks for the answers and suggestions everyone!
The speed issue I have is that simple things, like popup menues, clicking on
tabs of a pagecontrol, changing tasks ...almost everything is handled too
slowly. Compared to what I am used to, the delay is quite disturbing. The
other kind of
c...@freemail.hu wrote:
Thanks for the answers and suggestions everyone!
The speed issue I have is that simple things, like popup menues, clicking on
tabs of a pagecontrol, changing tasks ...almost everything is handled too
slowly. Compared to what I am used to, the delay is quite
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Bernd Mueller wrote:
c...@freemail.hu wrote:
Thanks for the answers and suggestions everyone!
The speed issue I have is that simple things, like popup menues, clicking
on
tabs of a pagecontrol, changing tasks ...almost everything is handled too
slowly.
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I run Windows 2000 under a VMWare in linux, and it is dog slow.
Try VirtualBox ;-)
I think we are more measuring the speed of VMWare and their drivers
than the actual guest OS.
you may be right, in VirtualBox you have to install the so called Guest
Additions.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Bernd Mueller muelle...@gmx.net wrote:
c...@freemail.hu wrote:
Thanks for the answers and suggestions everyone!
The speed issue I have is that simple things, like popup menues, clicking on
tabs of a pagecontrol, changing tasks ...almost everything is handled
Let's be honest here: current versions of both GNOME and KDE are quite
slower than XP UI.
It always felt a bit slower - what I and many others assumed to be
caused by the X architeture or lack of hardware acceleration - but
benchmarks seemed to differ.
Anyway Linux UI performance has been on a
Dear Leslie ,
I am also studying many Linux , FreeBSD , Solaris , OpenSolaris
distributions
to find an easily usable one with the condition that my program when
becomes ready
can be run on it as attached to a network .
I bought more than 10 hard disks with a smallest ( GigaByte / price )
null
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:11 PM, c...@freemail.hu wrote:
Let's be honest here: current versions of both GNOME and KDE are quite
slower than XP UI.
It always felt a bit slower - what I and many others assumed to be
caused by the X architeture or lack of hardware acceleration - but
Hello,
I have never used Linux before, but it is becoming an important development
target platform for us now. After installing Ubuntu 8.1 with gnome desktop I
was quite surprised that the user interface felt quite slugish. The same
machine with XP works as expected. It is hard to believe for
What does work slower ? The GUI (if so it might be because some wrong
configuration or wrong driver)
Something else ?
What was installed on the machine ? if there are many daemons and
services running, it will make things slower ...
Ido
2009/1/20 c...@freemail.hu:
Hello,
I have never used
2009/1/20 c...@freemail.hu:
Hello,
I have never used Linux before, but it is becoming an important development
target platform for us now. After installing Ubuntu 8.1 with gnome desktop I
was quite surprised that the user interface felt quite slugish. The same
machine with XP works as
Specifying exactly what parts are slow could help us identify it. What is
your PC's Specs? Ubuntu 8.1 is a newer OS by about 7 years to XP (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_xp), so it might have some underlying
assumptions about your hardware.
It could be that you have a high-end graphics
Am Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009 13:29:45 schrieb c...@freemail.hu:
- Is there a way to speed up Ubuntu? (drivers, other GUI ...)
right driver for the Graphiccard?
What Linux distro's are the
recommended targets for Lazarus apps?
deb-based (Debian,Ubuntu etc)
rpm-based (Red Hat,Suse etc)
c...@freemail.hu schrieb:
I have never used Linux before, but it is becoming an important
development target platform for us now. After installing Ubuntu 8.1 with
gnome desktop I was quite surprised that the user interface felt quite
slugish. The same machine with XP works as expected. It
After installing Ubuntu 8.1 with
gnome desktop I was quite surprised that the user interface felt quite
slugish.
Odd, I've built several Ubuntu systems from 7.10 and 8.04 and 8.10 and I've
been happy with the speed. Three of the systems are Mythtv boxes and they do a
fine job of HDTV.
This is more of a FPC question, but I know FPC gurus visit here...
The file program on Debian shows my Linux command line binary like this:
ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked
(uses shared libs), stripped
Is it possible to have full static linking? If
Perhaps I wrote too soon. I see this option for fpc:
-Xt link with static libraries (-static is passed to linker)
I will try that.
--- On Mon, 8/25/08, Jalal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jalal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux Binary without dynamically linked?
To:
Dňa Po, 2008-08-25 o 13:32 -0700, Jalal napísal:
This is more of a FPC question, but I know FPC gurus visit here...
The file program on Debian shows my Linux command line binary like
this:
ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
linked (uses shared libs),
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:30:35 +1000
SteveG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found the code necessary to get the GTK handle from a Lazarus handle
(for GTK2)
fWindow(int64) := GDK_WINDOW_XWINDOW( pointer(
PGtkWidget(Form1.Handle)^.Window ) );
add gtk2, gdk2x to the 'uses' section
More generic:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 6:37 AM, SteveG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having a problem understanding the usage of window handles in Linux
Linux (Ubuntu 8.04):
I can find no correlation between the Laz supplied window handle
(Form1.Handle), and the X11 required handle - found using 'xwininfo -int
So far I have found that Laz uses a Gtk pointer to a structure rather
than a window handle directly.
Anybody know what type of structure (and where to find it) ?
SteveG wrote:
Thanks Graeme
I will see if I can find how to convert from GTK to LCL handles (your
theory sounds good)
I have been
Thanks Graeme
I will see if I can find how to convert from GTK to LCL handles (your
theory sounds good)
I have been waiting for fpGUI to be stable enough to use anyway (from
the LCL point of view),
so this issue may be a null point soon anyway for me.
'xwininfo' does indeed find the 'main'
Found the code necessary to get the GTK handle from a Lazarus handle
(for GTK2)
fWindow(int64) := GDK_WINDOW_XWINDOW( pointer(
PGtkWidget(Form1.Handle)^.Window ) );
add gtk2, gdk2x to the 'uses' section
So far I have found that Laz uses a Gtk pointer to a structure rather
than a window
Having a problem understanding the usage of window handles in Linux
Windows (XP):
I can use the Win API to control (hide/show/etc) all windows, including
ones created by Laz using the handles supplied by Laz (eg Form1.Handle)
- they seem to be exactly the same as Windows handles.
Linux (Ubuntu
Op maandag 19-05-2008 om 15:25 uur [tijdzone -0300], schreef Felipe
Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is missing?
The development packages, but each distribution names them differently.
And they should be added
On 5/20/08, Joost van der Sluis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And they should be added automatically if they are really used. Problem
is that some development packages are needed, but not used bij the
lazarus/fpc binaries itself. (for example the mysql-client devel
packages)
No development
Op zondag 18-05-2008 om 17:01 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef ik:
I found this out last night since even the lazarus snapshot RPM's
don't seem to
indicate these as dependencies, maybe assumed that they already
exist on the
machine and the person installing has a modicum of knowledge about
On Sun, 18 May 2008 20:46:27 +0300
ik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
added to my todo list...
Ido
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Vincent Snijders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ik schreef:
Then the person that created the spec file didn't create it
properly imho.
What is missing?
The
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Mattias Gaertner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is missing?
The development packages, but each distribution names them differently.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
I'd never used Lazarus with CentOS (it is a server distro for Linux,
and it is not suitable enough for desktop use, use Fedora for desktop
use instead if you wish to have redhat approach).
For GTK2, you should install libgtk2* that is the libraries of GTK2
and also do not forget to install pixbuf
ik wrote:
I'd never used Lazarus with CentOS (it is a server distro for Linux,
and it is not suitable enough for desktop use, use Fedora for desktop
use instead if you wish to have redhat approach).
Hmmm. I'm no distro expert by any stretch, Ido but isn't it the same if I
don't
choose all
ik schreef:
Then the person that created the spec file didn't create it properly imho.
Can you provide a patch?
Vincent
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
added to my todo list...
Ido
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Vincent Snijders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ik schreef:
Then the person that created the spec file didn't create it properly imho.
Can you provide a patch?
Vincent
___
Lazarus mailing
Hi all,
I've loaded a new VirtualBox image with CentOS 5 and as usual, I've having a
little bit of trouble installing from sources, no doubt because of my limited
linux knowledge to date.
The biggest challenge that I have is ensuring that all required libraries are
installed. Would you
On 26/03/2008, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are in the process of re-writing our POS application and this time around
we
are wanting to included hand held table ordering. While it'll most likely be
WinCE/PocketPC, I wanted to check out the possibilities of a Linux based hand
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/03/2008, Lee Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are in the process of re-writing our POS application and this time
around we
are wanting to included hand held table ordering. While it'll most
likely
On 27/03/2008, Razvan Adrian Bogdan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
QTopia ones are using QT, others have their own framebuffer, fpGUI
seems to have found a place where it's most needed :)
:-) A while back someone created a DOS backend for fpGUI using
developer switchable framebuffer drivers. I
Warren Postma wrote:
Lee Jenkins wrote:
I know there is the WinCE development with Lazarus/FPC, but I was wondering
if
it was possible and if anyone had done any development on any of the Linux
Based
hand helds available?
Thanks
Thanks for the response, all.
We are in the process of
Hello,
can't say for your Nokia, but Lazarus works on the eeePC, with a Xandros
distrib
Best regards,
Thierry
Lee Jenkins a écrit :
Warren Postma wrote:
Lee Jenkins wrote:
I know there is the WinCE development with Lazarus/FPC, but I was wondering
if
it was possible and if anyone
hi i am getting the following Error:
../units/i386-linux/designer.o: In function
`TDESIGNER__DOORDERBACKSELECTIONONE':
/home/hy/work/src/lazarus/designer/designer.pp:958: undefined reference
to `VMT_OBJECTINSPECTOR_TOIISSUEPROPERTIES'
lazarus.pp(114,1) Error: Error while linking
lazarus.pp(114,1)
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:17:29 +
hy-soft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi i am getting the following Error:
../units/i386-linux/designer.o: In function
`TDESIGNER__DOORDERBACKSELECTIONONE':
/home/hy/work/src/lazarus/designer/designer.pp:958: undefined
reference to
Thanks, the matter seems to be solved
--
-hy
___
|
| hy-soft data-engineering
|
|mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|---
___
Lazarus mailing list
51 matches
Mail list logo
