Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:11:46 -0700 Lars via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > It's amazing someone hasn't thought of a web server that works off line, > that uses no ports, and just runs as some kind of plain Exe not using any > http port... Not sure if this is an absurd

Re: [Lazarus] WebAssembly

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:40:03 -0700 Lars via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > I thought the idea of web assembly was not to compile to javascript, but > to compile to byte code.. Yes, Javascript compatible bytecode. Keep in mind that the vendors are still experimenting. So

Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

On Wed, November 9, 2016 7:57 am, Marco van de Voort via Lazarus wrote: > The frequent updates that often break interfaces are also an headache. > This is what happened to firefox: xul runner's current state is broken/unknown/scary. I hope the same doesn't happen to chromium. Cef1 has some

Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

On Wed, November 9, 2016 3:10 am, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote: > On 2016-11-09 05:13, Lars via Lazarus wrote: > >> I find the documentation, for example, for >> Total Commander, to just be a little bit too Windows 3.1 looking. >> > > I'll bet you a 6-pack of beer that the documentation was

Re: [Lazarus] Help System with Chromium Embedded component

On Wed, November 9, 2016 3:07 am, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote: > On 2016-11-09 04:43, Lars via Lazarus wrote: > > >> One issue, back in the day, was that you could only use Java >> programming language, right? > > Hence the name "Java Applet" ;-) > > But, could one compile fpc code to

Re: [Lazarus] WebAssembly

On Wed, November 9, 2016 2:38 am, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote: > IMHO Silverlight is dying because Java is the winner over C#, due to > Android systems outselling any other OS architecture. > > > Hence WebASM - that seems to be based on Java - might be successful in > pushing the idea of