Re: [Lazarus] Managing Packages with many versions

2017-03-31 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:03:11 -0300 "Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus" wrote: >[...] > Yes, but as Michael said, I need to have many copies of the sources. > I thought that I could use just one source and many /libs directories with > the .ppu's > > What do you

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-03-31 Thread Alexey via Lazarus
On 31.03.2017 21:43, Balázs Székely via Lazarus wrote: - OPM becomes faster - it's more easier to maintain etc.. IMO benefit will be. it is "easier to maintain". Each developer which wants to send json, makes GH acc, then clones OPM repo, then sends pull req. No emails. Zip can be send in

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-03-31 Thread Balázs Székely via Lazarus
@Alexey Ok. Let's assume for a moment we move everything to GitHub. First I write to every single developer and ask them to make a GitHub account. By some miracle, everyone agrees and suddenly we are on GitHub. What would be the benefits? Until now I did not have to deal with the external json

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-03-31 Thread Alexey via Lazarus
It must not be the problem. Many apps use GH, and they need patches on GH, and users make them on GH. however some of the developers prefer GitHub, others BitBucket or SourceForge. It's very hard to convince somebody to move just for the sake of OPM. -- Regards, Alexey --

Re: [Lazarus] Managing Packages with many versions

2017-03-31 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > The IDE searches a lpk (correct name and version) and the > corresponding .ppu files are stored relative to the lpk. See here > http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_Packages#Different_ >

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-03-31 Thread Werner Pamler via Lazarus
Am 31.03.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Alexey via Lazarus: GetMem, it would be very good, if all Json files, for components, will be hosted on one Github repo. Now they are distributed (on NNN servers, etc). You can make repo for them. Alexey I don't see any advantage. Someone (GetMem?, you?) would

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-03-31 Thread Balázs Székely via Lazarus
> @DougC > Seems to me you should have at minimum 3 status for packages: > New - Not yet installed but available in repository > Updated - Already installed but a new version is in repository > Up-To-Date - Already installed and installed version is same as in > repository > Using "new" for both

Re: [Lazarus] Managing Packages with many versions

2017-03-31 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: Put the various versions in different directories. The IDE will use the correct one based on the dependencies and the

Re: [Lazarus] Managing Packages with many versions

2017-03-31 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > Below. Bellow is something a cow does ;-) > Yeah, sorry. :) > AFAIK The IDE will not work with that. > > It needs the actual sources of each version. So you need multiple >

[Lazarus] Managing Packages with many versions

2017-03-31 Thread Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus
Hi, I would like to know how I can manager my 3rd packages with different version. For example, imagine that: You have got a package called SmartFoo.lpk version 1.0. You are using the master/trunk version. Whe you compile it you got this: smartfoo\lib\x86_64-win64\*ppu, *.o, etc Now you can use

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-03-31 Thread Alexey via Lazarus
GetMem, it would be very good, if all Json files, for components, will be hosted on one Github repo. Now they are distributed (on NNN servers, etc). You can make repo for them. Alexey -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Linux 64 to Linux ARC crosscompile was:Lazarus and Windows 10 IoT

2017-03-31 Thread Andrea Mauri via Lazarus
P.S.2 Interesting idea would be create utility which will build only cross-compilers based on FPC already installed (like does FpcUpDeluxe but without need/overhead of SVN checkout and Lazarus build functionality). May be only ZIP archive with needed utilities + script which will do needed

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-03-31 Thread DougC via Lazarus
Seems to me you should have at minimum 3 status for packages: New - Not yet installed but available in repository Updated - Already installed but a new version is in repository Up-To-Date - Already installed and installed version is same as in repository Using "new" for both "not yet

Re: [Lazarus] fpDebug error "Debug information not available"

2017-03-31 Thread Gabor Boros via Lazarus
2017. 03. 28. 20:14 keltezéssel, Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus írta: Hello, I want to test the fpDebug debugger. I followed http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Need-testers-for-the-a-new-debugger-td4037911.html When I run a LCL application, I get the following error within