Re: [Lazarus] TMask revisited

2021-10-17 Thread Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus
16.10.2021 15:13, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus пишет: 16.10.2021 11:54, Juha Manninen via lazarus пишет: On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 11:20 AM Juha Manninen mailto:juha.mannine...@gmail.com>> wrote:     Yes, the TMaskWindows indeed behaves wrong. '**.pas*' matches with     '*abc.pas.bak*'. Fixed

Re: [Lazarus] TMask revisited

2021-10-17 Thread José Mejuto via lazarus
El 17/10/2021 a las 9:08, Juha Manninen via lazarus escribió: What does eMaskOpcodeOptionalChar do? It's not very clear to me from the comments in the code. Good question. It is the one syntax I don't fully understand yet. Below is an explanation from José himself. I will study this

Re: [Lazarus] TortoiseGit (was TMask revisited)

2021-10-17 Thread Florian Klämpfl via lazarus
Am 17.10.21 um 10:05 schrieb Juha Manninen via lazarus: I still feel uncomfortable with external branch management and synchronization. I believe a GUI tool could help with that. My main development platform is Linux where TortoiseGit is not available. I may look at some other GUI tools later.

[Lazarus] TortoiseGit (was TMask revisited)

2021-10-17 Thread Juha Manninen via lazarus
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 3:27 PM Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > You can right-click on the revision entry (in the log) itself, and there > you will be able to open unified diff viewer. Also 'raw' diffs are not > very convenient to me, I prefer to inspect them

Re: [Lazarus] TMask revisited

2021-10-17 Thread Juha Manninen via lazarus
On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 1:10 AM Bart via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > I see you implemented the "old" constructors with the TMaskOptions > parameter and deprecated them as suggested. > Thanks for that. > Maybe add: 'Will be removed in 2.4' or similar to the deprecated