Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

On 10.12.2016 10:30, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: What branch do you recommend? lazarus_v4 or lazarus_v5 Thank you! On 10.12.2016 10:29, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: The package file is on Source folder. The lazarus branches are the ones with

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-12-10 6:29 GMT-03:00 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara < luizameri...@gmail.com>: > > > 2016-12-10 5:23 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus < > lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>: > >> On 22.11.2016 19:02, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: >> >> GitHub. Is necessary to sync with main

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-12-10 5:23 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>: > On 22.11.2016 19:02, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: > > GitHub. Is necessary to sync with main repository > > > What branch do you recommend? There seem to be no Lazarus packages either > in

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

On 22.11.2016 19:02, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: GitHub. Is necessary to sync with main repository What branch do you recommend? There seem to be no Lazarus packages either in the v4, v5 or master:

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

Am 22.11.2016 um 19:05 schrieb Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus: 2016-11-22 14:44 GMT-03:00 Werner Pamler via Lazarus >: Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source file. So every

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 14:44 GMT-03:00 Werner Pamler via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>: > > Luiz, I like your idea to add a non-commented hint to the main source > file. So every user will get notified at compilation that he is using an > unsupported version. > > Shouldn't we do the same with > -

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

2016-11-22 14:58 GMT-03:00 Ondrej Pokorny via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>: > On 22.11.2016 18:53, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: > >> Proposal: >> Delete files in those folders and add README.txt pointing to new >> repository. >> > > What will be the new one and only repository?

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

On 22.11.2016 18:53, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:28:31 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:28:31 -0300 Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus wrote: > Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. > > In Lazarus-CCR: > > virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained > virtualtreeview-new: original

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

Am 22.11.2016 um 18:28 schrieb Luiz Americo Pereira Camara via Lazarus: Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port In GitHub:

Re: [Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

Hi Luiz Americo Pereira Camara Maybe it's better to keep standard git naming like master (for current), and simple branches like v4,v5,v6,... as necessary? Why having non-standard lazarus_master in _new_ repo?Is existing master just an old "history"? Please keep it simple.  22.11.2016, 20:28,

[Lazarus] Clarification about VirtualTreeView repositories (lazarus-ccr/virtualtreeview-new deprecation)

Currently there are three repositories of VirtualTreeView LCL port. In Lazarus-CCR: virtualtreeview: first port, long unmaintained virtualtreeview-new: original repository of the current port In GitHub: https://github.com/blikblum/VirtualTreeView-Lazarus : active repository of current port