Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-14 Thread Sven Barth via lazarus
jiaxing ruan schrieb am Di., 14. Apr. 2020, 15:03: > We have no control over GTK, too. IUP is better in this regard as it > doesn't change as much as GTK. IUP is much smaller than GTK, too. Creating > binding for IUP I only have to use h2pas. I don't think h2pas is able to > create binding for

Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-14 Thread jiaxing ruan via lazarus
t help with that. From: lazarus on behalf of Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 6:57 PM To: jiaxing ruan via lazarus Cc: Michael Van Canneyt Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, jiaxing ruan via lazarus wrote: > I skipped the

Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, jiaxing ruan via lazarus wrote: I skipped the Lua part in my binding because I think it will not needed for Free Pascal. Don't know if we would have any use for it. I only mentioned it because it contains ideas for properties. I don't propose to create/use lua

Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-14 Thread jiaxing ruan via lazarus
Van Canneyt via lazarus Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 6:08 PM To: zeljko via lazarus Cc: Michael Van Canneyt Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, zeljko via lazarus wrote: > On 4/14/20 10:07 AM, jiaxing ruan via lazarus wrote: >> Do you need

Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, zeljko via lazarus wrote: On 4/14/20 10:07 AM, jiaxing ruan via lazarus wrote: Do you need tester? I can help with testing. But anything needs more knowledge I afraid I can't. Anyway, did we at any time found it's tired to catch up with GTK? May be we could keep the

Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-14 Thread zeljko via lazarus
On 4/14/20 10:07 AM, jiaxing ruan via lazarus wrote: Do you need tester? I can help with testing. But anything needs more knowledge I afraid I can't. Anyway, did we at any time found it's tired to catch up with GTK? May be we could keep the current GTK3 interface. But my suggestion also deal

Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-14 Thread jiaxing ruan via lazarus
... interface is the most reasonable way to go. From: Sven Barth Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2020 12:58 PM To: Lazarus mailing list Cc: jiaxing ruan Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble jiaxing ruan via lazarus mailto:lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-13 Thread Sven Barth via lazarus
jiaxing ruan via lazarus schrieb am Di., 14. Apr. 2020, 05:59: > GTK changes too fast and our GTK3 binding is not updated. We don't have to > resource to catch up GTK. I suggest we abandon the GTK3 and any later GTK > version interface and instead create an IUP interface. IUP uses GTK >

[Lazarus] Completely solve the GTK trouble

2020-04-13 Thread jiaxing ruan via lazarus
GTK changes too fast and our GTK3 binding is not updated. We don't have to resource to catch up GTK. I suggest we abandon the GTK3 and any later GTK version interface and instead create an IUP interface. IUP uses GTK underlying, so we don't miss anything. Our apps will look just like when they