On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 1:24 PM Tarnyko via lazarus
wrote:
> From memory, Windows 95 would be the target of such a version (98 already
> supports an early GTK+ 2.x). Is that your target?
I was talking about native Win9x support for the Win32 widgetset (not
GTK widgetset on Windows).
--
Bart
From memory, Windows 95 would be the target of such a version (98 already
supports an early GTK+ 2.x). Is that your target?
(just as denisgolovan said, I salute such an effort -as little as the market
may be, and as long as it's doesn't delay/impede main stuff)
Kostas Michalopoulos via
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 10:58 PM Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus
wrote:
>
> On 2/13/22 21:33, Sven Barth via lazarus wrote:
> > Bart means the internal, private Lazarus developer list.
>
> I see, but then why tell me? :-P
So that would know it is debated and not simply ignored.
--
Bart
--
Am 13.02.2022 um 23:22 schrieb Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus:
Beyond that, as i wrote in the merge request, MUI is even more
"ancient" and yet Lazarus added support for it recently. I do not see
why it being called obsolete by its original developers means that one
couldn't work on it if
Am 13.02.2022 um 22:58 schrieb Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus:
On 2/13/22 21:33, Sven Barth via lazarus wrote:
Bart means the internal, private Lazarus developer list.
I see, but then why tell me? :-P
To explain to you that your request is looked at and why there might be
delays in
>From "Kostas"
> As to why, as i wrote in the comment in
> the merge request, i was curious about the Gtk 1.2 state, noticed that
> it didn't work and decided to fix it. I just simply like it when
> software doesn't drop support for old stuff just because they are old. I
> am into
On 2/13/22 23:41, Maxim Ganetsky via lazarus wrote:
But I still can't understand, why you put so much an effort into an
ancient and obsolete widgetset.
I only spent 2-3 days, including getting Gtk 1.2 itself to compile and
tracking down a gdk_pixbuf version that was compatible with Gtk 1.x,
On 2/13/22 21:33, Sven Barth via lazarus wrote:
Bart means the internal, private Lazarus developer list.
I see, but then why tell me? :-P
Kostas
--
___
lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
12.02.2022 20:25, Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus пишет:
Sending this mail again since it didn't arrive last time (can't even see
it in the archives).
This is actually my third attempt, using my gmail account now (i tried
my own email - not sure if it didn't pass through because the other
Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus schrieb am
So., 13. Feb. 2022, 18:31:
> On 2/13/22 16:49, Bart via lazarus wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 6:25 PM Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus
> > wrote:
> >
> > This is currently being discussed on the devel ML.
> >
>
> Isn't this the development
On 2/13/22 16:49, Bart via lazarus wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 6:25 PM Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus
wrote:
This is currently being discussed on the devel ML.
Isn't this the development mailing list? Most of the discussion seems to
be about Lazarus' development and can't find any
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 6:25 PM Kostas Michalopoulos via lazarus
wrote:
This is currently being discussed on the devel ML.
--
Bart
--
___
lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Sending this mail again since it didn't arrive last time (can't even see
it in the archives).
This is actually my third attempt, using my gmail account now (i tried
my own email - not sure if it didn't pass through because the other one
wasn't subscribed or due to some configuration issue...
13 matches
Mail list logo
