Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On 13/04/2020 10:11 pm, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote: > I have not used the OPM extensively, but I think that once a package has > been registered/accepted, I think the original author must be able to upload > his > own changes. Just curious - does the OPM support multiple versions of a

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via lazarus wrote: Hi, Στις 14/4/2020 4:15 μ.μ., ο Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus έγραψε: On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote: Don't distribute binaries, only sources. The binary may not work on all distributions, you'd need

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

Hi, Στις 14/4/2020 4:15 μ.μ., ο Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus έγραψε: On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote: Don't distribute binaries, only sources. The binary may not work on all distributions, you'd need to provide one for all platforms (which you may not have

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote: Don't distribute binaries, only sources. The binary may not work on all distributions, you'd need to provide one for all platforms (which you may not have yourself). It may be outdated, no security fixed applied etc.. Michael. Hmm, how

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

Hi, Στις 14/4/2020 3:42 μ.μ., ο silvioprog via lazarus έγραψε: On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:25 AM Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via lazarus mailto:lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>> wrote: Hmm, how about archive and/or object files for static linking ? An approach that I saw in mormot ( I don't

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:25 AM Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > Hmm, how about archive and/or object files for static linking ? An > approach that I saw in mormot ( I don't know if it is the same in OPK I > didn't check the package there ... ) >

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

Hi, Στις 14/4/2020 6:23 π.μ., ο Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus έγραψε: On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Sven Barth via lazarus wrote: Balázs Székely via lazarus schrieb am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020, 20:08: < snip > shipped with the package(if possible). Adding a new entry in the package tree it's not a

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

> > (should I send to getm...@gmail.com?) Yes please. I will update OPM as soon as possible. On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:14 PM silvioprog via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:18 AM Balázs Székely via lazarus < > lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > >>

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:18 AM Balázs Székely via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > @silvioprog > I added the "external dependencies" node to OPM, so it can be used in the > future. > Wow, it is exactly I'm looking for! Thank you more one time!  I'm going to send the

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

@Silvio > (is the lazarus-...@freepascal.org created? :-) ) > No, not yet :). Hopefully in a few months, each package maintainer will be able to update they own packages. -- ___ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:02 AM Balázs Székely via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > You're welcome. Just tell me what to change and I will change it. > Unfortunately there is no automatic mechanism for now(see my reply in the > other thread). > Thank you! (is the

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:23 AM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > +1. > > Don't distribute binaries, only sources. > Please notice I'm not suggesting to distribute binaries, but only some field to indicate the package depends on external

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: You are aware that Joost has already a completely function system for this ? No. I mean, I was aware that Joost is working on a package manager for fpc, but I didn't know any details about his work. Unfortunately this wasn't properly

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

> > You are aware that Joost has already a completely function system for this > ? No. I mean, I was aware that Joost is working on a package manager for fpc, but I didn't know any details about his work. Unfortunately this wasn't properly communicated between the two teams. We're going to roll

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

@silvioprog I added the "external dependencies" node to OPM, so it can be used in the future. On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 9:03 AM Balázs Székely wrote: > @Sven, @silvioprog, @Michael > OK. No binaries then. Obviously I'm a "windows minded" person, with little > experience on other platforms. >

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: @Michael I have not used the OPM extensively, but I think that once a package has been registered/accepted, I think the original author must be able to upload his own changes. @silvioprog Me too. Many other PMs allows the

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

@Sven, @silvioprog, @Michael OK. No binaries then. Obviously I'm a "windows minded" person, with little experience on other platforms. As a side node, OPM filters out binaries by default, however for a few well known packages, dlls were allowed, which turned out great and was appreciated by users.

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

@Michael I have not used the OPM extensively, but I think that once a package has been registered/accepted, I think the original author must be able to upload his own changes. @silvioprog Me too. Many other PMs allows the component/library authors to upgrade their packages. I personally would

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Sven Barth via lazarus wrote: Balázs Székely via lazarus schrieb am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020, 20:08: I have a naive suggestion for OPM. Some components depends on external libraries/binaries (libffi, openssl, libsagui etc.), so it would be nice any field like "Libraries",

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:05 PM silvioprog wrote: > Me too. Many other PMs allows the component/library authors to upgrade > their packages. I personally would like to use any procedure instead of > sending e-mail. > I meant "... to upgrade their packages by themselves." -- Silvio Clécio --

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 6:11 PM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < > > lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > > > >> What do you think about

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:22 PM Juha Manninen via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < > lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > >> What do you think about to create a new project "OPM" >> at bugs.freepascal? ☺ This way, the

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 3:08 PM Balázs Székely via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > @silvioprog > I updated Brook framework, by default win32/win64 and gtk2 are the > supported widget sets. If your package works on other platform too, like: > qt5, gtk3, cocoa, please let me know

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

Balázs Székely via lazarus schrieb am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020, 20:08: > > I have a naive suggestion for OPM. Some components depends on external >> libraries/binaries (libffi, openssl, libsagui etc.), so it would be nice >> any field like "Libraries", or "Dependencies", or even "External files" >>

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: What do you think about to create a new project "OPM" at bugs.freepascal? ☺ This way, the package's author just opens an new issue categorized

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > What do you think about to create a new project "OPM" > at bugs.freepascal? ☺ This way, the package's author just opens an new > issue categorized with "OPM" providing steps/requirements he wants to >

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

@Michael > Or is there a reason for having the 2 lists separate ? > Other then visually separate files from folders there is no reason. One list of names/masks should suffice, don't you think ? > Yes I agree, it can be done with a single list. I add it to my "to do list" :) @silvioprog I

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:12 PM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > I think that would be an excellent idea. > Not sure if lazarus-ide.org has a mailer. > I hope so, but if not, I can always create a lazarus-...@freepascal.org > or somesuch. > > Please let me

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:58 PM Balázs Székely via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > @silvioprog > I will update Brook framework soon. > Thank you very much for maintaining OPM! And feel absolutely free to ask any question about the package if you need.  I have a naive

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:56 AM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > As you are the author, I think it is your responsability to update the > package entry, no ? hm... I never published a package at OPM repository before, so I don't know how to do that

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: It's for the lazarus book Cool. Thank you. I wanted to be sure the instructions are correct. The instructions are correct, however that getm...@gmail.com it's kinda silly looking email. Perhaps we should switch to something more

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: @Michael I implemented the 'open package entry' feature in r.62959. If a package is available locally, you can open it by clicking the Open button or double click the selected package(screenshot1). More over if a package compile/install

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

> > It's for the lazarus book > Cool. Thank you. I wanted to be sure the instructions are correct. > The instructions are correct, however that getm...@gmail.com it's kinda silly looking email. Perhaps we should switch to something more official like: o...@lazarus-ide.org or something similar. I

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

@Michael I implemented the 'open package entry' feature in r.62959. If a package is available locally, you can open it by clicking the Open button or double click the selected package(screenshot1). More over if a package compile/install fails, OPM will offer you to open the package(screenshot2).

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, silvioprog via lazarus wrote: Hi all. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 7:50 AM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: Hi, I tried to install a package using the package manager (Brook framework). The package manager tells me the compile failed.

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

Hi all. On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 7:50 AM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to install a package using the package manager (Brook framework). > The package manager tells me the compile failed. > I took a look at the version available in OPM

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: Hi Michael, 'Upload somewhere the files and send the link to getm...@gmail.com or press the submit button, the files are directly uploaded to a remote server.' Is this still the official procedure ? Yes, pretty much. The most popular

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager list behaviour

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: Hi Michael, When I scroll the Online Package manager list of packages with the trackpad of the mac, then the list scrolls a couple of items and then jumps back to the item that was displayed initially. So it is impossible to scroll.

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: Hi Michael, I tried to install a package using the package manager (Brook framework). The package manager tells me the compile failed. How can I see what the actual error is ? The Message Window is not obscured by OPM, usually I check

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager list behaviour

Hi Michael, When I scroll the Online Package manager list of packages with the trackpad > of the mac, then the list scrolls a couple of items and then jumps back to > the item that was displayed initially. > So it is impossible to scroll. e..g. to the end of the list. > > If I use the scrollbar

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

Hi Michael, 'Upload somewhere the files and send the link to getm...@gmail.com or > press the submit button, the files are directly uploaded to a remote > server.' > Is this still the official procedure ? > Yes, pretty much. The most popular way is a dedicated thread in the forum(

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

Hi Michael, I tried to install a package using the package manager (Brook framework). > The package manager tells me the compile failed. > How can I see what the actual error is ? > The Message Window is not obscured by OPM, usually I check the error messages there. Ideally you shouldn't see any

[Lazarus] Online Package Manager list behaviour

Hi, On a mac, lazarus 2.0.6: When I scroll the Online Package manager list of packages with the trackpad of the mac, then the list scrolls a couple of items and then jumps back to the item that was displayed initially. So it is impossible to scroll. e..g. to the end of the list. If I use the

[Lazarus] Online Package Manager errors ?

Hi, I tried to install a package using the package manager (Brook framework). The package manager tells me the compile failed. How can I see what the actual error is ? Or must I open the package manually, compile manually to see the error ? If so, why isn't there a 'open this package' entry

[Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

Hi, How can one include a new package in the Online Package Manager repository ? on https://wiki.freepascal.org/Online_Package_Manager There is somewhere 'Upload somewhere the files and send the link to getm...@gmail.com or press the submit button, the files are directly uploaded to a

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-04-12 16:26 GMT+02:00 : > On 2017-04-12 09:15, Michalis Kamburelis wrote: >> >> >> GitHub is absolutely fine with uploading binary packages as a release. >> You can make a release on GitHub where a specific version of your >> source is accompanied by your binaries. >>

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

of the reason we decide to go with a central repository. Each package can be also updated from the developers webpage(it can be anything: sourceforge, github, personal page, etc...) -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Online-Package-Manager-tp

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

2017-04-12 14:56 GMT+02:00 Lars via Lazarus : > Is github okay with this idea though as they are really not a download > system like sourceforge or google code... > > They are more for source revision and not so much for final release > downloads, although, this

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

On 2016-10-04 07:35, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote: On 2016-10-04 13:11, Balázs Székely via Lazarus wrote: I decided to implement the online package manager(opkman) or at least give it a try. Not to deter from all your efforts, but I think there is already a brilliant solution called

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

On 2016-10-04 07:11, Balázs Székely via Lazarus wrote: Hi, I decided to implement the online package manager(opkman) or at least give it a try. The first stable(alpha) version is ready and it works like this: the packages are zipped and stored in a webserver(repository) along with a json file.

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

31.3.2017 22.38 "Alexey via Lazarus" kirjoitti: IMO benefit will be. it is "easier to maintain". Each developer which wants to send json, makes GH acc, then clones OPM repo, then sends pull req. No emails. Zip can be send in GH post. I don't think so. There is

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

On 31.03.2017 21:43, Balázs Székely via Lazarus wrote: - OPM becomes faster - it's more easier to maintain etc.. IMO benefit will be. it is "easier to maintain". Each developer which wants to send json, makes GH acc, then clones OPM repo, then sends pull req. No emails. Zip can be send in

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Online-Package-Manager-tp4049766p4051310.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org http://lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

It must not be the problem. Many apps use GH, and they need patches on GH, and users make them on GH. however some of the developers prefer GitHub, others BitBucket or SourceForge. It's very hard to convince somebody to move just for the sake of OPM. -- Regards, Alexey --

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

Am 31.03.2017 um 14:06 schrieb Alexey via Lazarus: GetMem, it would be very good, if all Json files, for components, will be hosted on one Github repo. Now they are distributed (on NNN servers, etc). You can make repo for them. Alexey I don't see any advantage. Someone (GetMem?, you?) would

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

; (on NNN servers, etc). > You can make repo for them. We did try to move all the json to one place, however some of the developers prefer GitHub, others BitBucket or SourceForge. It's very hard to convince somebody to move just for the sake of OPM. -- View this message in context: http://fr

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

GetMem, it would be very good, if all Json files, for components, will be hosted on one Github repo. Now they are distributed (on NNN servers, etc). You can make repo for them. Alexey -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

Seems to me you should have at minimum 3 status for packages: New - Not yet installed but available in repository Updated - Already installed but a new version is in repository Up-To-Date - Already installed and installed version is same as in repository Using "new" for both "not yet

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

would like a slightly different behavior. Anyway I set the default value is true. > Anyway, Thanks! You're welcome! -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Online-Package-Manager-tp4049766p4051288.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Laz

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

M.png> -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Online-Package-Manager-tp4049766p4051284.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

Of course a newly added package in the repository can/must be marked as new for a period of time. > With your method non-installed packages wouldn't show up as > "new" packages. I was talking about installed packages when I said that "all packages", sorry if it was not clear enough >> It

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

one... -- View this message in context: http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Online-Package-Manager-tp4049766p4051278.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@li

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

Very nice work! On 28.10.2016 8:20, Balázs Székely via Lazarus wrote: Suggestions are welcome. Just a note: please mind the image policy of Lazarus - see trunk\images\README.txt (if you haven't done it already). Especially please keep track of image sources you use (e.g. in some kind of

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-Online-Package-Manager-tp4049766p4050104.html Sent from the Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- ___ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org http://lists.lazarus-ide.org

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote: The online package manager works well and its operation is smooth thanks to threaded code. Earlier discussions have recommended fppkg. http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-An-online-package-manager-tt4043469.html#none I

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

The online package manager works well and its operation is smooth thanks to threaded code. Earlier discussions have recommended fppkg. http://free-pascal-lazarus.989080.n3.nabble.com/Lazarus-An-online-package-manager-tt4043469.html#none I discussed with GetMem earlier and he says fppkg is not

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:43:18 -0300 > silvioprog via Lazarus wrote: > > >[...] > > * rename it to something like LazGetIt or LPM (Lazarus package manager) > > Note:

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

On Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:43:18 -0300 silvioprog via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > * rename it to something like LazGetIt or LPM (Lazarus package manager) Note: the IDE's package manager is named Lazarus package manager. Mattias --

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Balázs Székely via Lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I decided to implement the online package manager(opkman) or at least > give it a try. The first stable(alpha) version is ready and it works like > this: the packages are zipped and

[Lazarus] Online Package Manager

Hi, I decided to implement the online package manager(opkman) or at least give it a try. The first stable(alpha) version is ready and it works like this: the packages are zipped and stored in a webserver(repository) along with a json file. I chose zip to minimize server load. The json file