Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-19 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via lazarus
On 13/04/2020 10:11 pm, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote: > I have not used the OPM extensively, but I think that once a package has > been registered/accepted, I think the original author must be able to upload > his > own changes. Just curious - does the OPM support multiple versions of a

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: You are aware that Joost has already a completely function system for this ? No. I mean, I was aware that Joost is working on a package manager for fpc, but I didn't know any details about his work. Unfortunately this wasn't properly

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-14 Thread Balázs Székely via lazarus
> > You are aware that Joost has already a completely function system for this > ? No. I mean, I was aware that Joost is working on a package manager for fpc, but I didn't know any details about his work. Unfortunately this wasn't properly communicated between the two teams. We're going to roll

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-14 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: @Michael I have not used the OPM extensively, but I think that once a package has been registered/accepted, I think the original author must be able to upload his own changes. @silvioprog Me too. Many other PMs allows the

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Balázs Székely via lazarus
@Michael I have not used the OPM extensively, but I think that once a package has been registered/accepted, I think the original author must be able to upload his own changes. @silvioprog Me too. Many other PMs allows the component/library authors to upgrade their packages. I personally would

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread silvioprog via lazarus
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:05 PM silvioprog wrote: > Me too. Many other PMs allows the component/library authors to upgrade > their packages. I personally would like to use any procedure instead of > sending e-mail. > I meant "... to upgrade their packages by themselves." -- Silvio Clécio --

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread silvioprog via lazarus
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 6:11 PM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < > > lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > > > >> What do you think about

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread silvioprog via lazarus
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 4:22 PM Juha Manninen via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < > lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > >> What do you think about to create a new project "OPM" >> at bugs.freepascal? ☺ This way, the

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: What do you think about to create a new project "OPM" at bugs.freepascal? ☺ This way, the package's author just opens an new issue categorized

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Juha Manninen via lazarus
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 8:47 PM silvioprog via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > What do you think about to create a new project "OPM" > at bugs.freepascal? ☺ This way, the package's author just opens an new > issue categorized with "OPM" providing steps/requirements he wants to >

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread silvioprog via lazarus
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 2:12 PM Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus < lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote: > I think that would be an excellent idea. > Not sure if lazarus-ide.org has a mailer. > I hope so, but if not, I can always create a lazarus-...@freepascal.org > or somesuch. > > Please let me

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: It's for the lazarus book Cool. Thank you. I wanted to be sure the instructions are correct. The instructions are correct, however that getm...@gmail.com it's kinda silly looking email. Perhaps we should switch to something more

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Balázs Székely via lazarus
> > It's for the lazarus book > Cool. Thank you. I wanted to be sure the instructions are correct. > The instructions are correct, however that getm...@gmail.com it's kinda silly looking email. Perhaps we should switch to something more official like: o...@lazarus-ide.org or something similar. I

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
On Mon, 13 Apr 2020, Balázs Székely via lazarus wrote: Hi Michael, 'Upload somewhere the files and send the link to getm...@gmail.com or press the submit button, the files are directly uploaded to a remote server.' Is this still the official procedure ? Yes, pretty much. The most popular

Re: [Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Balázs Székely via lazarus
Hi Michael, 'Upload somewhere the files and send the link to getm...@gmail.com or > press the submit button, the files are directly uploaded to a remote > server.' > Is this still the official procedure ? > Yes, pretty much. The most popular way is a dedicated thread in the forum(

[Lazarus] Online Package Manager question

2020-04-13 Thread Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus
Hi, How can one include a new package in the Online Package Manager repository ? on https://wiki.freepascal.org/Online_Package_Manager There is somewhere 'Upload somewhere the files and send the link to getm...@gmail.com or press the submit button, the files are directly uploaded to a