Re: [Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

2018-04-03 Thread Florian Klämpfl via Lazarus
Am 03.04.2018 um 15:02 schrieb Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus: > On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:37:13 +0200 > Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus wrote: > >> I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested >> comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested

Re: [Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

2018-04-03 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 19:37:13 +0200 Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus wrote: > I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested > comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first > comment limiter closes a comment. However,

[Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

2018-04-03 Thread Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus
I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting accordingly. Is there

[Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

2018-04-03 Thread Florian Klaempfl via Lazarus
I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting accordingly. Is there

[Lazarus] TP-like nested comment handling

2018-04-03 Thread Florian Klämpfl via Lazarus
I am playing with some old code which assumes TP-like handling of nested comments: i.e. there is only one level of nested comments, the first comment limiter closes a comment. However, Lazarus handles comments like FPC: it counts the nesting level and does syntax highlighting accordingly. Is there