On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 2:06 AM Martin Frb via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> I haven't gotten to test gdb 8.3 myself yet. So I do not know how it
> compares to other gdb versions.
>
gdb 8.3 is old!
Manjaro has already version 9.1. Maybe it contributed to my solid debugging
On 10/04/2020 23:54, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM C Western via lazarus
mailto:lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>>
wrote:
The current FPC 3.2.0RC1 / 2.0.8 release works fine for me, though I
would comment that debugging with gdb seemed particularly
On 10/04/2020 10:46, C Western via lazarus wrote:
The current FPC 3.2.0RC1 / 2.0.8 release works fine for me, though I
would comment that debugging with gdb seemed particularly crash prone;
I am using:
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 8.3.50.20190824-30.fc31 (64 bit)
It (gdb) would crash far too often
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 11:46 AM C Western via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> The current FPC 3.2.0RC1 / 2.0.8 release works fine for me, though I
> would comment that debugging with gdb seemed particularly crash prone; I
> am using:
>
> GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora
The current FPC 3.2.0RC1 / 2.0.8 release works fine for me, though I
would comment that debugging with gdb seemed particularly crash prone; I
am using:
GNU gdb (GDB) Fedora 8.3.50.20190824-30.fc31 (64 bit)
It (gdb) would crash far too often on hitting a breakpoint in my
program. I would say
On 4/10/20 1:28 AM, Denis Kozlov via lazarus wrote:
Hello Martin,
If it's not too late, can r62551 be merged too?
Bug report #36490:
Bitmap transparency (mask) not respected by TMenuItem
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36490
There are fixes for gtk2,qt,qt5 for same thing too
zeljko
Hello Martin,
If it's not too late, can r62551 be merged too?
Bug report #36490:
Bitmap transparency (mask) not respected by TMenuItem
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36490
Regards,
Denis
On 02/04/2020 09:41, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote:
We would invite everyone to provide their
On 03/04/2020 11:05, Juha Manninen via lazarus wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:35 AM Rolf Wetjen via lazarus
mailto:lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>>
wrote:
I wanted to ask for https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35362
OK, that makes more sense. :)
Issue #35362 is a regression. If
Thank you, Juha.
I've reopened #36798.
Rolf
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
___
lazarus mailing list
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:35 AM Rolf Wetjen via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> I wanted to ask for https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35362 and
> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36798.
>
OK, that makes more sense. :)
Issue #35362 is a regression. If your patch
Juha,
I wanted to ask for https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35362 and
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=36798.
Rolf
Am 03.04.2020 um 10:22 schrieb Juha Manninen via lazarus:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:58 AM Rolf Wetjen via lazarus
mailto:lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>>
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 10:58 AM Rolf Wetjen via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> can you please check for r35362 and r36798 and probably include them too?
>
Those are from February and April 2012. Eight years ago.
Are you surely looking at Lazarus commit history?
Juha
--
Hello Martin,
can you please check for r35362 and r36798 and probably include them too?
Thank you,
Rolf
--
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
___
lazarus mailing list
Martin,
I haven't reported this bug because it's difficult to reproduce, but with
some of the recent releases and many of the trunk check in there seems to
be a lot of problems with the sparta docked form designer (DFD), at least
on Linux gtk2.
What happens is that with the DFD installed on
El 2/4/20 a les 12:13, Juha Manninen via lazarus ha escrit:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:40 PM Luca Olivetti via lazarus
mailto:lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>>
wrote:
It's not urgent (because I use my local copy with the patch) but there
is this:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 12:40 PM Luca Olivetti via lazarus <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> It's not urgent (because I use my local copy with the patch) but there
> is this:
>
> https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35715
>
I took care of it. It can safely be merged.
Juha
--
El 2/4/20 a les 10:41, Martin Frb via lazarus ha escrit:
- Other urgent matters, you believe we should know before the release.
It's not urgent (because I use my local copy with the patch) but there
is this:
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=35715
Bye
--
Luca Olivetti
Wetron
The Lazarus team has scheduled
Lazarus 2.0.8
for April 2020 (estimated 14th to 20th)
This release will be built with FPC 3.0.4.
Here is the list of fixes for Lazarus 2.0.8 (since 2.0.0):
http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_2.0_fixes_branch
We would invite everyone to provide
18 matches
Mail list logo
