Re: [Lazarus] chm doc generation scripts deleted?

2017-10-10 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 12:39:52 +0200 Marco van de Voort via Lazarus wrote: > I noticed the scripts that I used to generate the LCL chms are partially > deleted. > > r55175 | mattias | 2017-06-02 23:01:01 +0200 (vr, 02 jun 2017) | 1 > line > Changed paths: >D

Re: [Lazarus] chm doc generation scripts deleted?

2017-10-10 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Mon, 9 Oct 2017 12:06:48 +0200 Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote: >[...] > It's not really new: build_lcl_docs > > ./build_lcl_docs -h > gives you the available options. For example: Put FPC's xct, chm, kwd files into lazarus/docs/chm/ cd docs/html

Re: [Lazarus] chm doc generation scripts deleted?

2017-10-09 Thread Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 12:39:52 +0200 Marco van de Voort via Lazarus wrote: > I noticed the scripts that I used to generate the LCL chms are partially > deleted. > > r55175 | mattias | 2017-06-02 23:01:01 +0200 (vr, 02 jun 2017) | 1 > line > Changed paths: >D

Re: [Lazarus] chm doc generation scripts deleted?

2017-10-08 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus
On 2017-10-08 11:39, Marco van de Voort via Lazarus wrote: Is there some new recommended way? Most likely because a "documentation build script" is not needed any more. Since fpdoc supports project files (--project parameter), such build scripts became obsolete - at least that is true for

[Lazarus] chm doc generation scripts deleted?

2017-10-08 Thread Marco van de Voort via Lazarus
I noticed the scripts that I used to generate the LCL chms are partially deleted. r55175 | mattias | 2017-06-02 23:01:01 +0200 (vr, 02 jun 2017) | 1 line Changed paths: D /trunk/docs/html/build_lazutils_html.sh D /trunk/docs/html/build_lcl_html.sh Is there some new recommended way? --