On 22/01/2023 13:12, Marco van de Voort via lazarus wrote:
On 22-1-2023 12:39, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote:
They should be called
AnsiCodepoint
UniCodeCodePoint
No, since in the case of a surrogate it is not a codepoint either. It
is the unit of encoding granularity, nothing more.
Ouch,
On 22-1-2023 12:39, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote:
They should be called
AnsiCodepoint
UniCodeCodePoint
No, since in the case of a surrogate it is not a codepoint either. It is
the unit of encoding granularity, nothing more.
But anyway, that ship sailed in (D)2009. It is probably the
On 22/01/2023 11:53, Michael Van Canneyt via lazarus wrote:
Since the PChar/Char types are now an alias, logically the debug info
should only have references to AnsiChar/UnicodeChar.
Well technically neither of them is (always) an actual character.
They should be called
AnsiCodepoint
