On Friday 05 February 2010 23:49, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
I can only imagine such hacks will inevitably fail somewhere down
the line - or is simply not supported by all widgetsets. Is it just my
imagination, or is there more and more feature being added to LCL
which only works on specific
On Friday 05 February 2010 23:31, Kjow wrote:
2010/2/5 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com:
Yes, you need to mess with Gtk to do it. I would however recommend
that you try it with Qt instead. The Qt API is much easier to use and
the Qt interface is also much better
On Friday 05 February 2010 19:56, JoshyFun wrote:
More or less :) Mostly is tell to GTK2 that I'll paint something over
TEdit and please GTK do not erase it :) or I you do it let me know
to repaint my own content.
Exact example is on my wiki page (but works with qt only :) ).
--
On 6 February 2010 04:28, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
But now Lazarus uses and requires Qt 4.5+ which is LGPL, the same
license as Gtk, which means in short: no problems
What does that mean? Can you now use Qt 4.5+ in commercial software
without buying
On 6 February 2010 10:09, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
and less buggy (just look at bug tracker, and compare number and type of qt
bugs vs. gtk2 bugs),
But that could also be explain as follows... not as many people are
using the LCL-Qt widgetset compared to the LCL-GTK2 widgetset. :-)
On Saturday 06 February 2010 09:35, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 6 February 2010 10:09, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
and less buggy (just look at bug tracker, and compare number and type of
qt bugs vs. gtk2 bugs),
But that could also be explain as follows... not as many people are
using
2010/2/6 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
On 6 February 2010 00:31, Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com wrote:
What about licenses using of QT in commercial projects?
You need to purchase a commercial license. $2500 US per developer -
starting price (if I remember correctly).
--
On Saturday 06 February 2010 12:02, Kjow wrote:
2010/2/6 Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com:
On 6 February 2010 00:31, Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com wrote:
What about licenses using of QT in commercial projects?
You need to purchase a commercial license. $2500 US per developer -
2010/2/6 zeljko zel...@holobit.net:
No, Graeme is wrong. Qt is LGPL-ed so you can create commercial apps without
buying Qt commercial licenses.
zeljko
Oh, well this reevaluates the question. So if I use QT in my Lazarus
projects I don't have to pay nothing to Nokia. And what about sources?
Do
On 06/02/2010, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
No, Graeme is wrong. Qt is LGPL-ed so you can create commercial apps without
buying Qt commercial licenses.
So when do you need a Qt license then?
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a
On 06/02/2010, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
I'll try Lazarus with LCL-Qt for the next week to see how it goes - I
haven't tried LCL-Qt in a while.
Feedback is welcome :)
See my new message thread Lazarus IDE + Qt annoyances.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
Hi,
I was told to give feedback on my usage of LCL-Qt, so here goes. I
simply recompiled Lazarus IDE with LCL-Qt.
I downloaded and used bin-qt4pas-V1.72_Qt4.5.2.tar.gz for the qt4intf
library. Using Ubuntu 9.04 (32-bit) and Lazarus 0.9.29 (svn updated
from 2010-02-05).
* Source Editor window
On Saturday 06 February 2010 12:39, Kjow wrote:
2010/2/6 zeljko zel...@holobit.net:
No, Graeme is wrong. Qt is LGPL-ed so you can create commercial apps
without buying Qt commercial licenses.
zeljko
Oh, well this reevaluates the question. So if I use QT in my Lazarus
projects I don't
On Saturday 06 February 2010 13:12, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
I was told to give feedback on my usage of LCL-Qt, so here goes. I
simply recompiled Lazarus IDE with LCL-Qt.
I downloaded and used bin-qt4pas-V1.72_Qt4.5.2.tar.gz for the qt4intf
library. Using Ubuntu 9.04 (32-bit) and
On 06/02/2010, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
* Treeview component doesn't point the + symbol to indicate that the
node can be expanded. It draws an empty rectangle. See attached
screenshot.
some themes does not draw + symbol on linux (eg. windows theme), dunno why,
problem is
On Saturday 06 February 2010 13:32, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
* IDE now doesn't detect when a file is changed by an external
program. I don't get prompted by the IDE to reload the file. To make
sure this is not a general IDE issue, I recompiled my IDE with GTK2
(same revision as I used for
On 06/02/2010, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
* Toolbar buttons with down arrow for dropdown menu. The down arrow is
not drawn. See attached screenshot.
no screenshoot, but also I don't have such arrow on dropdown menu , so must
recompile into gtk2 to see what have to be there :)
On Saturday 06 February 2010 14:00, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Here is another screenshot of Qt Designer showing that it is not an
issue with my Qt theme. In Qt Designer the toolbar downarrows are
drawn correctly (and they are flat buttons), but not in Lazarus IDE.
Toolbar in Qt Designer is
A font issue:
With IDE + LCL-GTK2 I use Source Editor with font DejaVu Sans Mono
with Size 10 font, but in IDE + LCL-Qt the font size was much smaller,
so I had to change the Source Editor font to DejaVu Sans Mono with
Size 11 font so that the text looked the same size as under LCL-GTK2.
This was
On 06/02/2010, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
Toolbar in Qt Designer is native QToolBar class, but in LCL we use LCL one,
not native Qt class, so there could be the reason,
Why the exception to the rule? Isn't the whole idea of LCL to wrap
native widget components and not use custom drawn
Hello List,
No sooner have I resolved the one problem than the next puzzling experience.
Previously I had a component installed that used the DCPcrypt package which
I subsequently deleted. Now the application compiles with no errors, but at
runtime I get the message:
Class TDCP_ripemd160 not
On Saturday 06 February 2010 14:13, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 06/02/2010, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
Toolbar in Qt Designer is native QToolBar class, but in LCL we use LCL
one, not native Qt class, so there could be the reason,
Why the exception to the rule? Isn't the whole idea of
On Saturday 06 February 2010 14:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
A font issue:
With IDE + LCL-GTK2 I use Source Editor with font DejaVu Sans Mono
with Size 10 font, but in IDE + LCL-Qt the font size was much smaller,
so I had to change the Source Editor font to DejaVu Sans Mono with
Size 11 font
On Saturday 06 February 2010 14:09, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
A font issue:
With IDE + LCL-GTK2 I use Source Editor with font DejaVu Sans Mono
with Size 10 font, but in IDE + LCL-Qt the font size was much smaller,
so I had to change the Source Editor font to DejaVu Sans Mono with
Size 11 font
On Saturday 06 February 2010 14:00, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 06/02/2010, zeljko zel...@holobit.net wrote:
* Toolbar buttons with down arrow for dropdown menu. The down arrow is
not drawn. See attached screenshot.
no screenshoot, but also I don't have such arrow on dropdown menu ,
06.02.2010 20:13, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Why the exception to the rule? Isn't the whole idea of LCL to wrap
native widget components and not use custom drawn ones?
Every rule has an exception. This statement too.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
With IDE + LCL-GTK2 I use Source Editor with font DejaVu Sans Mono
with Size 10 font, but in IDE + LCL-Qt the font size was much smaller,
so I had to change the Source Editor font to DejaVu Sans Mono with
Size 11 font so that the text looked the same size as under LCL-GTK2.
This was only an
On Saturday 06 February 2010 15:46, Juha Manninen wrote:
With IDE + LCL-GTK2 I use Source Editor with font DejaVu Sans Mono
with Size 10 font, but in IDE + LCL-Qt the font size was much smaller,
so I had to change the Source Editor font to DejaVu Sans Mono with
Size 11 font so that the
yes, not only on qt, look at
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=15331
I think it was only a QT issue but I reported it little wrong first.
Your fix was late last year, r23129, and it still works for me.
Juha M.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On 06/02/2010, Juha Manninen juha.manni...@phnet.fi wrote:
It is easy to change but still I wonder how can they measure the heights so
differently.
My thought too. The only thing I can think of is in my Gnome setup
(global desktop settings), the DPI is forced to 96. Yet my X Window
system
Hi,
I have OpenSuse 11.2 and KDE4.3.4.
* Source Editor window keeps jumping. It jumps to the top left corner
of the screen after opening every project.
No jumping here.
* Toolbar buttons with down arrow for dropdown menu. The down arrow is
not drawn.
It is drawn correctly for me.
*
On 06/02/2010, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com wrote:
My thought too. The only thing I can think of is in my Gnome setup
(global desktop settings), the DPI is forced to 96. Yet my X Window
system reports the dpi otherwise, at 89 DPI.
$ xdpyinfo | grep resolution
resolution:
On 06/02/2010, Juha Manninen juha.manni...@phnet.fi wrote:
* Source Editor window keeps jumping. It jumps to the top left corner
of the screen after opening every project.
No jumping here.
I can make a screencast to prove it. :-) The Source Editor window
jumps to position (0,0) whenever
Hello Lazarus-List,
Saturday, February 6, 2010, 9:17:01 AM, you wrote:
The problem with LCL is that it inherits a lot of
habits from Windows platforms
GG This is something I have experienced as well, so am glad to see others
GG are noticing the same thing. LCL is meant to be cross-platform,
On Saturday 06 February 2010 16:20, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Functionality is still fine, it simply doesn't draw the + symbol in
the small rectangle.
Yes, it does ... check r 23656
zeljko
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Hi Zeljko,
Here disabled toolbuttons in the IDE have a border (look like buttons)
while enabled ones are flat.
Need a screenshot?
Cheers
Theo
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Saturday 06 February 2010 18:45, theo wrote:
Hi Zeljko,
Here disabled toolbuttons in the IDE have a border (look like buttons)
while enabled ones are flat.
Need a screenshot?
No, I see that, fight with it currently, but got strange results when drawing
normal button via
Hi
I get the following error when doing a make clean all with latest SVN
under win32 (Windows 7)
...
compiling lclclasses.pp
imglist.pp(160,14) Error: There is no method in an ancestor class to be
overridden
TCustomImageList.Equals(TObject):Boolean;
imglist.pp(206,1) Fatal: There were 1
Howard Page-Clark schreef:
Hi
I get the following error when doing a make clean all with latest SVN
under win32 (Windows 7)
...
compiling lclclasses.pp
imglist.pp(160,14) Error: There is no method in an ancestor class to be
overridden
TCustomImageList.Equals(TObject):Boolean;
* The first is the usual dialog where converter inform us that some
properties are invalid and offer us to remove them. But this dialog needs
some improvement for example when there is a component on form resource that
is unknown, such as the case of for example TRichedit, maybe because it's
Howard Page-Clark schreef:
On 06/2/10 9:02, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Howard Page-Clark schreef:
Hi
I get the following error when doing a make clean all with latest
SVN under win32 (Windows 7)
...
compiling lclclasses.pp
imglist.pp(160,14) Error: There is no method in an ancestor class to
On 2/4/2010 11:15, Klenongan wrote:
@ waldo kitty
no preview there... both are the same image and look like a lottery thing calling out
upload and earn cash :?
Strange, I can see the images just fine. Maybe something wrong with
your proxy, or network settings? The xs.to is one of my
On 2/5/2010 06:24, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(*) there probably is a good blurb about the name python. There is also one
about Lazarus. When it is not instinctive however, it doesn't matter.
So yes to Ruby, no to Python. What about Emerald? It is more precious than
Ruby, provides a nice hook
On 2/5/2010 07:30, Paul van Helden wrote:
It is a real pity about Jack Wolfskin, but I'd still go for the paw and
refrain from making T-Shirts with it (or at least have the T-Shirts made
by someone who cannot be sued :-) ). A big cat's paw print is the
ultimate emblem of stealth and speed IMHO,
On Sunday 07 February 2010 00:08, JoshyFun wrote:
No problem is not solved because:
1) EraseBackground is now invoked, but calling inherited
EraseBackground does not perform the default erasebackground
procedure.
2) Now background is completly gone due (1)
3) WMPaint is invoked but the
45 matches
Mail list logo
