On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Paul Ishenin i...@kmiac.ru wrote:
19.05.2010 5:27, ik пишет:
I wish to make the IDE to be bdRightToLeft when the IDE translated
either to Arabic or Hebrew.
Except of the editor and Object Inspector I think that every window
should be bdRightToLeft.
So
2010/5/18 ik ido...@gmail.com:
I wish to make the IDE to be bdRightToLeft when the IDE translated either to
Arabic or Hebrew.
Does that mean your source code goes right-to-left as well? Wow, that
would be weird! :-)
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys graemeg.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does that mean your source code goes right-to-left as well? Wow, that
would be weird! :-)
Yes Text in SynEdit is Right To Left Reading in Windows, there is some
confused when mix English and Our language
Hello
Is it correct, that the paintable area of an Image.Canvas is not growing
with the Image?
Example:
Put a TImage on an empty Form. Set Align to alClient.
Then put for ex. this code in Form.OnChangeBounds
procedure TForm1.FormChangeBounds(Sender:TObject);
begin
With Image1 do
begin
http://ik.homelinux.org/
2010/5/19 Zaher Dirkey parm...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Paul Ishenin i...@kmiac.ru wrote:
19.05.2010 5:27, ik пишет:
I wish to make the IDE to be bdRightToLeft when the IDE translated
either to Arabic or Hebrew.
Except of the editor and Object
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:09:18AM -0700, Razvan Adrian Bogdan wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nlwrote:
If you can deal with Delphi, and can be substituted by PHP programmers, you
are doing something wrong.
What is wrong about web programming in
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 07:40:56AM -0700, Myles Wakeham wrote:
I've been struggling to find a way to compete in this market with
development environments like FPC/Lazarus, simply because although I
want do it in those technologies, the lack of tools, frameworks, etc.
means that I lose out
theo wrote:
Hello
Is it correct, that the paintable area of an Image.Canvas is not growing
with the Image?
No, this is your problem. The canvas size is exactly the size of the
graphic inside the image. It is independent of the size of the TImage.
Example:
Put a TImage on an empty Form.
19.05.2010 16:35, theo wrote:
See: http://www.theo.ch/lazarus/lazimgresize.png
Is it a bug, or is it by design?
I think by design. Delphi works the same.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Il 18/05/2010 23.24, Jesus Reyes ha scritto:
not necesary to submit report, fixed in r 25502
tested. ok.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
Il 18/05/2010 22.43, Jesus Reyes ha scritto:
fixed in r25501
tested. ok.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Wed, 19 May 2010 10:35:40 +0200
theo x...@theo.ch wrote:
Hello
Is it correct, that the paintable area of an Image.Canvas is not growing
with the Image?
Example:
Put a TImage on an empty Form. Set Align to alClient.
Then put for ex. this code in Form.OnChangeBounds
procedure
Thank you both.
I thought it might be correct, that's why I didn't make a bug report.
I saw people are using/recommending TImage.Canvas for drawing because
drawing is non-volatile, unlike TPaintBox.
They are probably not aware, that it doesn't resize the graphic.
Best Regards
Theo
--
I've created a small patch for it, you can see the images in the bug report
:)
There is still a lot work to do, but that's a start :)
The bug report:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=16516
Ido
http://ik.homelinux.org/
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:41, ik ido...@gmail.com wrote:
Once NativeClient (http://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/) gains its
popularity (and all browsers would have NativeClient)
All scripting languages would be outdated, leaving its place for
native compilers, like FPC (gcc and etc).
The interesting thing is FPC is NativeClient ready (since x86 and
Hi all,
last revision which can build Lazarus 0.9.28.2 is rev. 15279.
Something in rev. 15282 broke the build.
there is a problem building Lazarus LCL 0.9.28.2 rev. 25502 from
.../lazarus/tags/lazarus_0_9_28_2 with the FPC 2.4.1 rev. 15293 from
.../fpc/branches/fixes_2_4.
does the FPC
Has anybody got query's to work with weblaz TCustomCGIApplication?
ie.
my.cgi?q=hello
and my.cgi then outputs whatever q is?
the AResponse.Fields don't get filled with the query and AResponse.URL
doesn't contain the URL for me to parse myself :(
--
19.05.2010 20:37, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote:
does the FPC 2.4.x should / must / need to build the latest stable version
of Lazarus ( currently
0.9.28.2 ) ?
lazarus 0.9.28 is based on fpc 2.4.0. No guaranties that it will work
with 2.4.2
Is there a plan for a simultaneously release for
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:41:30PM +0400, dmitry boyarintsev wrote:
Once NativeClient (http://code.google.com/p/nativeclient/) gains its
popularity (and all browsers would have NativeClient)
All scripting languages would be outdated, leaving its place for
native compilers, like FPC (gcc and
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 08:59:12PM +0800, Paul Ishenin wrote:
lazarus 0.9.28 is based on fpc 2.4.0. No guaranties that it will work
with 2.4.2
Is there a plan for a simultaneously release for both FPC 2.4.2 and Lazarus
( let's say 0.9.28.3 ) ?
Probably in a month after the fpc
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 13:45 +0100, Vannus wrote:
Has anybody got query's to work with weblaz TCustomCGIApplication?
ie.
my.cgi?q=hello
and my.cgi then outputs whatever q is?
the AResponse.Fields don't get filled with the query and AResponse.URL
doesn't contain the URL for me to parse
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
If I read this, nativeclient seems to be more RIA oriented than web
oriented.
What is RIA?
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
19.05.2010 21:06, Marco van de Voort wrote:
.28 or .30?
Possibly not .28 and not .30
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
felipemonteiro.carva...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
If I read this, nativeclient seems to be more RIA oriented than web
oriented.
What is RIA?
Rich Internet
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Marco van de Voort mar...@stack.nl wrote:
If I read this, nativeclient seems to be more RIA oriented than web
oriented.
What is RIA?
thanks,
Hi Felipe,
Rich Internet Application
On 19 May 2010 15:28, Paul Ishenin wrote:
Possibly not .28 and not .30
1.0 then? :-/ I'm all for the 1.0 release, but with the many
regression bugs I found recently, that would worry me.
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a cross-platform
dmitry boyarintsev schrieb:
However RTL needs to be prepared for NaCl.
A salted RTL? ;-)
DoDi
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
19.05.2010 21:45, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
but with the many
regression bugs I found recently, that would worry me.
All reported regressions bugs must be fixed before any release.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
theo schrieb:
I saw people are using/recommending TImage.Canvas for drawing because
drawing is non-volatile, unlike TPaintBox.
An implementation can use either a fixed-size bitmap, so that painting
is non-volatile, or recreate the bitmap with every change in size, so
that previous content
Here's the stuff. You're the only recipient due sole to time.
Stu Cox
Project Management Technician
Southern Interior Region
Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure
342-447 Columbia St.,
Kamloops, BC V2C 2T3
p: 250-828-4320
f: 250-828-4229
stuart@gov.bc.ca
On 19/05/2010 14:47, Paul Ishenin wrote:
19.05.2010 21:45, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
but with the many
regression bugs I found recently, that would worry me.
All reported regressions bugs must be fixed before any release.
It is all normal that snapshot/SVN-trunk code does have regressions,
On 19 May 2010 17:48, Martin wrote:
As it stands currently, I am not 100% convinced, that not quite some of them
may only be reported *after* the next release (Since not every user uses
trunk).
This is exactly the point I was trying to get across. I for one do not
use Trunk as much as I did in
You can find demo programs for fpweb under your Lazarus directory in
/components/fpweb/demo/
the fptemplate ones are particularly useful for building websites with
FPC/Lazarus
AB
On 5/19/2010 05:45, Vannus wrote:
Has anybody got query's to work with weblaz TCustomCGIApplication?
ie.
The solution is simple. Create at least three rc (Release Candidate)
releases. This will greatly improve the stability of a final release
without the need for many point releases. Everybody in the software
world knows that rc release can contain some bugs and will probably be
fixed before the
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Michael Van Canneyt
mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
The solution is simple. Create at least three rc (Release Candidate)
releases. This will greatly improve the stability of a final release
without the need for many point releases. Everybody in the software
Graeme Geldenhuys schreef:
release. Some form of pre-release, but I think no one (who doesn't use trunk
anyway) will test it unless it can easy and safely be tested without
The solution is simple. Create at least three rc (Release Candidate)
releases. This will greatly improve the stability of
Vincent Snijders schreef:
IHMO, snapshots about a week before a release can be considered release
candidates.
The same way as current fpc 2.4.1 snapshots can be considered fpc 2.4.2
release candidates.
Vincent
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
ah-ha! there they are - thanks!
On 19 May 2010 14:24, Joost van der Sluis jo...@cnoc.nl wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 13:45 +0100, Vannus wrote:
Has anybody got query's to work with weblaz TCustomCGIApplication?
ie.
my.cgi?q=hello
and my.cgi then outputs whatever q is?
the
Hi, I'm trying to create a non-default action that must be executed when
the url is /cgi-bin/myprogram?action=ShowListing. When I change the
Content-property to ShowListing it automatically adds an #10 character
at the end, this can be easily see in the lfm file as follows (also note
that
19.05.2010 23:48, Martin wrote:
Otherwise, we need to find a way to convince more people to test
before we release. Some form of pre-release, but I think no one (who
doesn't use trunk anyway) will test it unless it can easy and safely
be tested without interfering with their stable
στις 19/5/2010 9:36 μμ, O/H Vincent Snijders έγραψε:
Vincent Snijders schreef:
IHMO, snapshots about a week before a release can be considered
release candidates.
The same way as current fpc 2.4.1 snapshots can be considered fpc 2.4.2
release candidates.
AFAIU, the fpc 2.4.2 is a
στις 19/5/2010 4:47 μμ, O/H Paul Ishenin έγραψε:
19.05.2010 21:45, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
but with the many
regression bugs I found recently, that would worry me.
All reported regressions bugs must be fixed before any release.
Because ' ... it's difficult for a programmer to figure out
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:12:33AM +0300, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote:
release candidates.
AFAIU, the fpc 2.4.2 is a maintenance release of the 2.4.0 branch. If
i'm correct, no new features ( except maybe very small ones which don't
break the compatibility ) and only bug fixes
On 19/05/2010, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
FPC uses release candidates; We usually get very little response;
But maybe that's because the released versions are near perfect ;-)
:-) Just remember that Lazarus introduce a lot more changes that FPC
between releases. So by a huge margin, Lazarus
I had problems with values returned by OnDrawReticule event. Always returns
values from last series defined on my object.
I explore this component and I found this:
procedure TReticuleTool.MouseMove(APoint: TPoint);
.
.
.
for i := 0 to FChart.SeriesCount - 1 do
if
On 19/05/2010, Vincent Snijders wrote:
IHMO, snapshots about a week before a release can be considered release
candidates.
A week is not nearly enough time to test the amount of code and
changes in Lazarus IDE and Lazarus LCL (and all it's many backends).
fpGUI has a fraction of the code
στις 20/5/2010 2:04 πμ, O/H Marco van de Voort έγραψε:
The Alpha, Beta, RCx, Release, Maintenance cycle is a must if you care
about your users. The people who use your product. Don't make them chase
a moving target. If you need to break something do so. In another major
or minor release. Not in
20.05.2010 7:12, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
but thinking a week is enough for something
as large as Lazarus is very optimistic (and totally unrealistic).
The next version will not be final. It will be still beta. And then we
will have at least 3 RC.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
2010/5/20 Jorge López loval.jlo...@gmail.com:
I had problems with values returned by OnDrawReticule event. Always returns
values from last series defined on my object.
I explore this component and I found this:
[fix skipped]
Is that correct?
Yes, thanks for noticing. You are probably the
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:59, Paul Ishenin webpi...@mail.ru wrote:
19.05.2010 20:37, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis wrote:
does the FPC 2.4.x should / must / need to build the latest stable version
of Lazarus ( currently
0.9.28.2 ) ?
lazarus 0.9.28 is based on fpc 2.4.0. No guaranties that it
50 matches
Mail list logo
