2011/12/30 Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com:
2011/12/30 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
Maybe you can use:
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk/images/powered-by.svg
Vincent
Nice, SVG!
Thank you!
Is there SVG of IDE icon (the stylized cheetah)?
Best Regards
Kjow
Can I
In www.freepascal.org is wrote:
Current Version
Version *2.4.4 *is the latest stable version the Free Pascal. Hit the
download http://www.freepascal.org/download.var link and select a mirror
close to you to download your copy. The development releases have version
numbers *2.5.x*. See the
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:19:27 +0100
Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/30 Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com:
2011/12/30 Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com:
Maybe you can use:
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk/images/powered-by.svg
Vincent
Nice, SVG!
Thank you!
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
As I've written in the wiki itself, I wanted to wait with this until the JVM
port is merged to trunk.
I commited in rev 34549
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Hi,
I've read about cross compiling on the wiki, finaly managed to rebuild
sources and install compiled binaries and units however fpc's target OSes
did not changed and still missing support for Win64.
Sources were built with
make all OS_TARGET=win64 CPU_TARGET=x86_64
make crossinstall
2012/1/3 David Unric dunric...@gmail.com:
The question is about including another target in fpc compiler so I need not
to call separate cross-compiler.
If you installed the cross compiler correctly, you can use fpc
-Px86_64, which will call the cross compiler.
Vincent
--
Am 03.01.2012 13:40, schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Sven Barthpascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
As I've written in the wiki itself, I wanted to wait with this until the JVM
port is merged to trunk.
I commited in rev 34549
Ok. Thank you.
Regards,
2012/1/3 Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de:
Modified how?
Using the original has the advantage of recognition and tracking.
You can modify it.
Anyway, you may want to add a link here:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Projects_using_Lazarus
Mattias
I merged Lazarus Icon with
Am 03.01.2012 13:45, schrieb David Unric:
I can produce x86_64/win64 binaries manually with 'ppcrossx64' but the
main fpc.exe still lacks win64 target, so I'm not able switch in Lazarus
between win32 and win64 targets.
The fpc.exe simply calls the default ppcXXX.exe for which it was
compiled
Nice!
please, share the svg file...
William de Oliveira Ferreira
Bacharel em Sistemas de Informação
2012/1/3 Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com
2012/1/3 Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com:
I merged Lazarus Icon with Powered by (svg), in next email I'll
attach it.
Here
On 12/30/2011 04:23 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
If that is at the expense of requiring a GUI system then IMHO it gets
worse rather than better:-)
+1
The generation should be callable from another script.
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
2012/1/3 William Oliveira Ferreira bdexterholl...@gmail.com:
Nice!
please, share the svg file...
I have no svg of Lazarus Icon (the stylized cheetah on png format).
I merged:
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk/images/powered-by.svg
with
Michael Schnell schrieb:
On 12/30/2011 04:23 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
If that is at the expense of requiring a GUI system then IMHO it gets
worse rather than better:-)
+1
The generation should be callable from another script.
As it already is?
If you want to learn more about the
2012/1/3 Kjow antispamm...@gmail.com:
2012/1/3 William Oliveira Ferreira bdexterholl...@gmail.com:
Nice!
please, share the svg file...
I have no svg of Lazarus Icon (the stylized cheetah on png format).
I merged:
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/trunk/images/powered-by.svg
with
Thx Vincent,
by supplying -P switch to fpc, I can finally produce x86_64 executables.
I'm surprised this switch is not mentioned in interactive help (fpc -? or
-h).
Why compiler fails when supplied with documented -Ttarget os option ?
fpc -Twin64 consoleapp.dpr
Error: Illegal parameter: -Twin64
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:46:54 +0100
Bart bartjun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
A while ago I added buildmodes to one of my projects (Release and
Debug) with 2 different sets of options for code-generation and
linking.
I then told the IDE to use these compileroptions for all my new projects.
This
I got it, thank You Sven.
Now I just need to set Lazarus to use -P option if I set target CPU family
target in Project options. It seems to be ignored by my current installed
version 0.9.31 .
Regards.
David
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.comwrote:
Am
On Tuesday 03 of January 2012 15:55:58 David Unric wrote:
I'd like to ask somebody to shed some light on this subjects:
1) why supplying target OS option (-T) fails ? If I'd like to build win64
exe on win32 system have I pass CPU Target and fpc automagically selects
appropriate OS Target ?
Am 03.01.2012 15:55, schrieb David Unric:
Lazarus 0.9.31 seems to do not use -P option as it still produces i386
code even if target CPU family is set to x86_64 in Project options and
exe is rebuilt from scratch (console app).
Are you sure that it's a 32-Bit application?
I'd like to ask
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:55:58 +0100
David Unric dunric...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx Vincent,
by supplying -P switch to fpc, I can finally produce x86_64 executables.
I'm surprised this switch is not mentioned in interactive help (fpc -? or
-h).
Indeed. Please create a bug report.
Why compiler
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.comwrote:
Am 03.01.2012 15:55, schrieb David Unric:
Lazarus 0.9.31 seems to do not use -P option as it still produces i386
code even if target CPU family is set to x86_64 in Project options and
exe is rebuilt from
Hi Mattias,
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.dewrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:55:58 +0100
David Unric dunric...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx Vincent,
by supplying -P switch to fpc, I can finally produce x86_64 executables.
I'm surprised this switch is not
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:19:57 +0100
David Unric dunric...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Lazarus 0.9.31 seems to do not use -P option as it still produces i386
code
even if target CPU family is set to x86_64 in Project options and exe is
rebuilt from scratch (console app).
It does use the -P
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:23:08 +0100
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
The error with the first external class or interface declaration now
has gone away, but I have found a new problem:
Ctrl+Clicking on an identifier that is declared in the AndroidR14 unit
gives the
On 1/3/12, Mattias Gaertner nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 16:46:54 +0100
It was never implemented. Only the active build mode was saved
(one set of compiler options).
I must have been delirious then, because that is how I remember it,
and being excited that it did that.
Hello list,
That got me ! I know what a circle reference is, but can anyone explain with
more details what a “cycle reference” is, please!
I need a suggestion to translate this to portuguese. Usually an “invalid
circle” is translated as “referência circular inválida”,
but right now i am
On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:23:08 +0100
Sven Barth pascaldra...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
### TCodeToolManager.HandleException: Bezeichner nicht gefunden:
TObject at Line=2 Col=6 in
/mnt/data/source/fpc/fpc-jvm/rtl/android/jvm/androidr14.pas
But there is no TObject at that position.
It
03.01.2012 22:24, marcelo.bp пишет:
Hello list,
That got me ! I know what a circle reference is, but can anyone explain
with more details what a “cycle reference” is, please!
Cycle in this context (package/project dependencies) means exactly
what circle meant before. In fact there is no term
On 03/01/2012 17:30, Maxim Ganetsky wrote:
03.01.2012 22:24, marcelo.bp пишет:
Hello list,
That got me ! I know what a circle reference is, but can anyone explain
with more details what a “cycle reference” is, please!
Cycle in this context (package/project dependencies) means exactly
what
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 15:24:24 -0300
marcelo.bp marcelo...@netsite.com.br wrote:
Hello list,
That got me ! I know what a circle reference is, but can anyone explain with
more details what a “cycle reference” is, please!
I'm not a native English speaker, so maybe both are bad English.
It
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.de wrote:
The term circle was translated from German graph theory, but the
common words in English graph theory are cycle and cyclic.
But people speak of circular unit reference. I never heard cyclic
unit reference. If you
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Mattias Gaertner
nc-gaert...@netcologne.dewrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 17:19:57 +0100
David Unric dunric...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Lazarus 0.9.31 seems to do not use -P option as it still produces
i386
code
even if target CPU family is set to x86_64 in
2012/1/3 silvioprog silviop...@gmail.com:
Wow, nice icon.
Thank you :)
Best Regards,
Kjow
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 21:16:34 +0100
David Unric dunric...@gmail.com wrote:
How did you changed IDE to always pass -T and -P options ?
Here is what he did:
http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/ide/compileroptions.pp?sortby=dateroot=lazarusview=diffr1=34561r2=34560diff_format=h
R.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:19:31AM -0200, Fabio Luis Girardi wrote:
Version *2.4.4 *is the latest stable version the Free Pascal. Hit the
download http://www.freepascal.org/download.var link and select a mirror
close to you to download your copy. The development releases have version
numbers
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Sven Barth wrote:
Am 03.01.2012 13:45, schrieb David Unric:
I can produce x86_64/win64 binaries manually with 'ppcrossx64' but the
main fpc.exe still lacks win64 target, so I'm not able switch in Lazarus
between win32 and win64 targets.
The
I must agree with Felipe.
Cyclic to me, remember something that repeats within a period.
I just recall one error that uses the term cyclic that is the well known
CRC error.
So I must keep the translations as they are, and keep the word circular in
portuguese where cyclic/cycle is referred.
On 03/1/12 5:43, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The term circle was translated from German graph theory, but the
common words in English graph theory are cycle and cyclic.
I'm not familiar with graph theory and the possibly specialist technical
meanings given there to words in common use.
On 30/12/2011 16:51, Helmut Hartl wrote:
On OSX lion 10.7.2 in lazarus trunk, the svn revision 33972 breaks the
mouse wheel scrolling in the ide editor
(at least for a magic mouse) - The view stutters, does not scroll, or
scrolls only some lines and stops.
The version before worked fine.
marcelo.bp schrieb:
That got me ! I know what a circle reference is, but can anyone explain
with more details what a “cycle reference” is, please!
There exist several idioms:
circular [unit] references leading to *wrong* circle ...
loop (endless loop) in code execution or unit references
Martin schrieb:
Cycle in this context (package/project dependencies) means exactly
what circle meant before. In fact there is no term circle anymore,
it was replaced by cycle.
well I am not a native English speaker, but are we sure cycle is
better (in terms of correctness) than circle (or
Howard Page-Clark schrieb:
On 03/1/12 5:43, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The term circle was translated from German graph theory, but the
common words in English graph theory are cycle and cyclic.
I'm not familiar with graph theory and the possibly specialist technical
meanings given there to
On 3-1-2012 22:51, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
On 03/1/12 5:43, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
The term circle was translated from German graph theory, but the
common words in English graph theory are cycle and cyclic.
I'm not familiar with graph theory and the possibly specialist technical
43 matches
Mail list logo
