Paul Ishenin schrieb:
18.03.12 11:11, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
These are only different implementations of the same (TDockManager)
interface. I found LDockTree unusable, failing already on slightly
nested layouts. It also lacks layout streaming, required in applications
like the IDE. Dunno a
18.03.12 11:11, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
These are only different implementations of the same (TDockManager)
interface. I found LDockTree unusable, failing already on slightly
nested layouts. It also lacks layout streaming, required in applications
like the IDE. Dunno about the current state,
I need to make simple transfer of text data over tcp/ip, which socket class the
list recomends? (Must run in mac also)
Regards,
Everton
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo
When you do a New Project, it is "virtual" until it is saved. It means the
project structure is initially only in memory.
The GUI could as well hide the project interface and let the user open
files and whatever. They would still be saved in a default project's
session info but the user would not n
I just can't see any problem, I like it the way it is.
Jether Fernandes Reis
-Mensagem Original-
De: "Jürgen Hestermann"
Para: "Lazarus mailing list"
Enviada em: domingo, 18 de março de 2012 11:29
Assunto: Re: [Lazarus] Why does a project have to be open?
Sven Barth schrieb:
Also
On 03/18/2012 11:45 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
brian wrote:
I've recently switched distros to Mint Debian 12 64-bit XFCE. This
is on an AMD Phenom *4, 4 GB of RAM. When I was reinstalling stuff I
noticed that the latest version of Lazarus that they have in the
repo is 0.9.28, a bit old I know,
brian wrote:
I've recently switched distros to Mint Debian 12 64-bit XFCE. This is on
an AMD Phenom *4, 4 GB of RAM. When I was reinstalling stuff I noticed
that the latest version of Lazarus that they have in the repo is 0.9.28,
a bit old I know, but it works for what I do.
So I installed 0.
On 18.03.2012 15:29, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Sven Barth schrieb:
Also this is no "feature", it's currently one of the core concepts of
Lazarus and it was so for years. So I doubt that this will be changed
in the near future (before 1.0 at least).
Although I have arranged with it now it anno
On 18/03/2012 14:29, Jürgen Hestermann wrote:
Sven Barth schrieb:
Also this is no "feature", it's currently one of the core concepts of
Lazarus and it was so for years. So I doubt that this will be changed
in the near future (before 1.0 at least).
Although I have arranged with it now it ann
Sven Barth schrieb:
Also this is no "feature", it's currently one of the core concepts of
Lazarus and it was so for years. So I doubt that this will be changed
in the near future (before 1.0 at least).
Although I have arranged with it now it annoyed me too. No other program
(including Free
On 18/03/2012 08:50, ik wrote:
Hello,
I tried to compile Lazarus today from svn (after two weeks of not
updating it), and got the following error message:
lazarus/components/synedit/synedithighlighterfoldbase.pas(722,13)
Error: Asm: [movsxd mem64,reg32] invalid combination of opcode and
operands
On 18/03/2012 08:50, ik wrote:
Hello,
I tried to compile Lazarus today from svn (after two weeks of not
updating it), and got the following error message:
lazarus/components/synedit/synedithighlighterfoldbase.pas(722,13)
Error: Asm: [movsxd mem64,reg32] invalid combination of opcode and
operands
I've recently switched distros to Mint Debian 12 64-bit XFCE. This is
on an AMD Phenom *4, 4 GB of RAM. When I was reinstalling stuff I
noticed that the latest version of Lazarus that they have in the repo
is 0.9.28, a bit old I know, but it works for what I do.
So I installed 0.9.28, which al
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> I implemented a TIndexedAVLTree.
Great! thanks a lot =)
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mail
Martin schrieb:
On that part, I wondered why the old layout stuff was totally
abandoned.
?
The classes in ideintf\idewindowintf.pas
Really? This would explain why the EasyDockMaster will fail now, using
the old stuff.
No no no
you miss understand
They are not abandoned, they work well in
18.03.2012 14:08, Mattias Gaertner пишет:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:50:27 +0200
ik wrote:
Hello,
I tried to compile Lazarus today from svn (after two weeks of not
updating it), and got the following error message:
lazarus/components/synedit/synedithighlighterfoldbase.pas(722,13)
Error: Asm: [mov
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:08, Mattias Gaertner
wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:50:27 +0200
> ik wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I tried to compile Lazarus today from svn (after two weeks of not
>> updating it), and got the following error message:
>> lazarus/components/synedit/synedithighlighterfoldbas
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 10:50:27 +0200
ik wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to compile Lazarus today from svn (after two weeks of not
> updating it), and got the following error message:
> lazarus/components/synedit/synedithighlighterfoldbase.pas(722,13)
> Error: Asm: [movsxd mem64,reg32] invalid combinat
2012/3/18 Bernd Kreuss :
> On 17.03.2012 23:08, Salvatore Coppola wrote:
>
>> I'm low level user so can you take a look, is how you supposed?
>
> Somehow somewhere the default mount options can be changed in xubuntu. I
> assume you want it to have it mounted with exec bits set every time you
> plug
2012/3/18 Gustavo Enrique Jimenez :
> hi all:
> Not executing programs from external file systems is a kernel option
> adopted by many linux distros, I think. You should copy the program to
> the local filesystem and change permissions to execute it.
I see what you say.
thx
Salvatore
> 2012/3/17
Hello,
I tried to compile Lazarus today from svn (after two weeks of not
updating it), and got the following error message:
lazarus/components/synedit/synedithighlighterfoldbase.pas(722,13)
Error: Asm: [movsxd mem64,reg32] invalid combination of opcode and
operands
It happens at lazarus/component
On 17.03.2012 22:14, Ajeandro Gonzalo wrote:
Oh, it's more than just annoying. It causes applications using Advantage Database
components to crash, especially if you forget to add adsdata to the uses clause (no, I
don't know why ADS doesn't add that automatically). Lazarus then doesn't allow
On Sunday 18 of March 2012 08:29:53 Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 18 March 2012 03:10, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
> > LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR=0 ./lazarus
>
> But why doesn't the LCL-GTK2 work with those new scrollbars? I thought
> those new scrollbars should "just work" with any native GTK2
> applicati
Den 17-03-2012 09:48, Mattias Gaertner skrev:
The idea of the modal dialog is that it sits there and waits for you
to tell it what to do.
I would rather it just sat there and did nothing. No dialog.
Why does it have to open a window forcing me to create or open a project?
There is little it
On 18 March 2012 03:10, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> LIBOVERLAY_SCROLLBAR=0 ./lazarus
But why doesn't the LCL-GTK2 work with those new scrollbars? I thought
those new scrollbars should "just work" with any native GTK2
application.
OpenOffice, LibreOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird etc are exceptions,
25 matches
Mail list logo
