2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
>>
>> 2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
>>>
>>> Look at the version numbers: 1.1 is trunk, 1.0.5 is stable+fixes (the
>>> main
>>> download page is 1.0.4 so hasn't quite caught up). Choose and keep
>>> separate.
>>
>>
>> What do you mean by "hasn'
On 25/1/13 6:38, appjaws wrote:
On 25/01/13 18:26, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
On 25/1/13 3:55, appjaws wrote:
Hi,
Could one of you experts look at my code please.
My program crashes after the first set of strings are added because -- I
think -- the length is not updating.
You're not initialisin
oh yeah, now i got ...
2013/1/25 Sven Barth
> Am 25.01.2013 12:09, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira:
>
>
>
> 2013/1/25 Michael Schnell
>
>> On 01/25/2013 06:59 AM, Héctor F. Fiandor Rosario wrote:
>>
>>
>> I have not dissabled the Delphi5 installation, and often I consult the
>> Delphi´s hel
On 25/01/13 18:26, Howard Page-Clark wrote:
On 25/1/13 3:55, appjaws wrote:
Hi,
Could one of you experts look at my code please.
My program crashes after the first set of strings are added because -- I
think -- the length is not updating.
The following is just a snipet.
It's hard to tell from
On 25/1/13 3:55, appjaws wrote:
Hi,
Could one of you experts look at my code please.
My program crashes after the first set of strings are added because -- I
think -- the length is not updating.
The following is just a snipet.
It's hard to tell from a snippet, but I don't see anywhere that you
Hi,
Could one of you experts look at my code please.
My program crashes after the first set of strings are added because -- I
think -- the length is not updating.
The following is just a snipet.
type
Detail = record
Extra1, Extra2, Extra3, Extra4, Extra5, Extra6, Extra7, Extra8 :string
Vincent Snijders wrote:
2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
Look at the version numbers: 1.1 is trunk, 1.0.5 is stable+fixes (the main
download page is 1.0.4 so hasn't quite caught up). Choose and keep separate.
What do you mean by "hasn't quite caught up"? It is up to date, isn't it?
I was trying
2013/1/25 Mark Morgan Lloyd :
> Look at the version numbers: 1.1 is trunk, 1.0.5 is stable+fixes (the main
> download page is 1.0.4 so hasn't quite caught up). Choose and keep separate.
What do you mean by "hasn't quite caught up"? It is up to date, isn't it?
Vincent
--
_
Anton Kavalenka hat am 25. Januar 2013 um 12:21 geschrieben:
> On 23.01.2013 11:44, Michael Schnell wrote:
>
> > > On 01/22/2013 06:52 PM, Anton Kavalenka wrote:
> >
> > > > >
> > > But GTK Widgetset uses pure Xlib calls for determining keyboard
> > > states.
> > >
Am 25.01.2013 12:09, schrieb William Oliveira Ferreira:
2013/1/25 Michael Schnell mailto:mschn...@lumino.de>>
On 01/25/2013 06:59 AM, Héctor F. Fiandor Rosario wrote:
I have not dissabled the Delphi5 installation, and often I
consult the Delphi´s help for some details.
Same
On 23.01.2013 11:44, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/22/2013 06:52 PM, Anton Kavalenka wrote:
But GTK Widgetset uses pure Xlib calls for determining keyboard states.
Xlib thread-safety is not initialized in GTK2 widgetset.
AFAIK: As the GUI and Event-queue related LCL classes (i.e.
TApplicati
2013/1/25 Michael Schnell
> On 01/25/2013 06:59 AM, Héctor F. Fiandor Rosario wrote:
>
>
> I have not dissabled the Delphi5 installation, and often I consult the
> Delphi´s help for some details.
>
>
> Same here (but using the once free "Turbo Delphi" aka D7).
>
> But I did not dare to write th
Good day,
I got a problem with a TBitmap image from TBitBtn button that didn’t
display during run time.
--
Kind Regards
Eric Kom
System Administrator & Programmer - Metropolitan College
_
/ You are scrupulously honest, frank, and \
| straightforward.
On 01/25/2013 06:59 AM, Héctor F. Fiandor Rosario wrote:
I have not dissabled the Delphi5 installation, and often I consult the
Delphi´s help for some details.
Same here (but using the once free "Turbo Delphi" aka D7).
But I did not dare to write this (again) ;-) .
-Michael
--
__
Antonio Fortuny wrote:
Hi again.
On the download sites I always see for Linux downloads:
In fairness, that's the "Daily Snapshot" page, not the "Download" page.
Rather more serious is that the last update on the explanatory wiki page
was in 2011.
1. Lazarus (needs fpc and fpc-src)
followe
Antonio Fortuny hat am 25. Januar 2013 um 09:32
geschrieben:
> Hi again.
>
> On the download sites I always see for Linux downloads:
>
> 1. Lazarus (needs fpc and fpc-src)
> followed by lazarus-1.1.39945-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 65Mo
> then
> 2. Lazarus fixes (needs fpc and fpc-src)
> followed by
Le 25/01/2013 09:42, Mattias Gaertner a écrit :
Any ideas ?
Maybe you mixed two Lazarus?
AFAIK this isn't the case
If yes:
Close IDE.
Delete ~/.lazarus/bin and ~/.lazarus/packagefiles.xml.
Start IDE and build it clean.
I'll try this anyway
Mattias
--
__
Antonio Fortuny hat am 25. Januar 2013 um 09:07
geschrieben:
> Yes, again.
> Hi Folks.
>
> On a Linux OpenSuse x86_64, Lazarus 1.1 37432 31/05/2012, FPC 2.6.0
> After a successful compilation of Indy 10.5.9 package (latest SVN
> source) when trying to install it: BOUM !
> All packages up to SQLDB
Hi again.
On the download sites I always see for Linux downloads:
1. Lazarus (needs fpc and fpc-src)
followed by lazarus-1.1.39945-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 65Mo
then
2. Lazarus fixes (needs fpc and fpc-src)
followed by lazarus-1.0.5.39944-20130124.laz.x86_64.rpm 63Mo
What is the subtle dif
Yes, again.
Hi Folks.
On a Linux OpenSuse x86_64, Lazarus 1.1 37432 31/05/2012, FPC 2.6.0
After a successful compilation of Indy 10.5.9 package (latest SVN
source) when trying to install it: BOUM !
All packages up to SQLDBLaz have been compiled OK
Fatal: Can't find unit system used by Lazarus
w
20 matches
Mail list logo
