Il 12.10.2015 17:58, Bart ha scritto:
Well, I would vote for 2.0 for the next stable release that comes with
the 3.0 compiler.
We can then get rid of all code that is win9x compatible etc.
This will cleanup the LCL a bit.
Especially if we also then decide that 2.0 will NOT support the fpc
2.6
Il 09.07.2015 21:45, Michael Van Canneyt ha scritto:
Just an opinion:
I am working with Graeme Geldenhuys to create a reporting engine from
scratch.
I think Lazreport's design contains some fundamental flaws, which can
only be remedied by re-implementing a reporting engine from scratch.
Il 26.06.2015 13:30, Graeme Geldenhuys ha scritto:
Hi,
Last night I was working on a relatively new project. This got me
thinking... How do others tackle such a task?
So here is my question:
When faced with a new database related project, where do you start? Do
you first design the
Il 19.02.2015 11:24, zeljko ha scritto:
But Lazarus have it's own standards and there's minimum requirement
for gtk3 libs (think it's 3.8)
You could eventually consider pinning your Debian installation. See
for example
http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html
--
Il 16.02.2015 22:55, j...@mbstemps.com ha scritto:
Vince,
I am not quite sure how to respond to a posting, if I havn't done it
correctly, sorry, ignorance sounds so much better than 'stupidity'.
Vince, this is just a personal opinion but you may find this forum a
little 'choppy' to pick up
Hi everyone
I have just subscribed to this mailing list, being interested in a
future (in the next few months) development of an accounting program
using Pascal + Lazarus.
For the time being, I'll probably lurk keeping silent, but then I'll
start asking questions, hoping not to disturb you,
