On 01/11/2011 03:18 PM, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
Because this thread is called 'Can't find unit contnrs used by
Masks', I will answer to this:
The IDE now warns if fpc has no config file and can not find any ppu
files.
I did replace the seemingly corrupted fpc.cfg in /etc by some old one I
Hi Hans Peter and other Experts,
As I wrote some days ago, after, with your kind help, being able to
rebuild Lazarus, I get a SIGSEGVerror when creating a new empty
project and starting it.
After some testing I found that I can run a new empty gtk2 project (even
after adding some controls
Because this thread is called 'Can't find unit contnrs used by
Masks', I will answer to this:
The IDE now warns if fpc has no config file and can not find any ppu
files.
Mattias
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On 01/05/2011 11:37 AM, Kjow wrote:
If I understood what you need, in Build profiles, you can choose what
build or not...
Sorry for having bothered you with this. Silly me did not see the right
tab of the configure build dialog that gets me to the advanced options.
Now I switched off
On 01/04/2011 06:13 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Best you build clean *everything* except the examples (some examples
may not compile from time to time).
I don't see how to do this (and of course they already are cleaned as I
already did clean and build all).
So I'll just wait until the
2011/1/5 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
I don't see how to do this (and of course they already are cleaned as I
already did clean and build all).
So I'll just wait until the problem is fixed.
If I understood what you need, in Build profiles, you can choose what
build or not. In the last
Michael Schnell schrieb:
If I do Build LCL the compilation works.
If I do Build IDE with or (without Packages) I get
Clean Lazarus Source completed
/home/mschnell/Downloads/svn/lazarus/trunk/components/codetools/ctxmlfixfragment.pas(1,1)
Fatal: Can't find unit LazarusPackageIntf used by
On 12/16/2010 11:17 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Maybe the file is from a previous install?
This seems like true.
Now I found a better fpc.cfg still sitting in /etc that I once renamed.
This gets me much further when compiling Lazarus, but I get:
2011/1/3 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
On 12/16/2010 11:17 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Maybe the file is from a previous install?
This seems like true.
Now I found a better fpc.cfg still sitting in /etc that I once renamed.
This gets me much further when compiling Lazarus, but I
On 01/03/2011 03:54 PM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
revert to revision 28849 until
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18375 has been fixed.
OK. I can wait :-) .
Or don't build the examples.
If I do Build LCL the compilation works.
If I do Build IDE with or (without Packages) I get
Clean
On 12/17/2010 11:31 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Should I just remove it ?
Might be the wisest solution.
renamed it and now I get:
Clean Lazarus Source completed
Fatal: Can't find unit system used by AllLCLUnits
I suppose now no fpc.cfg file at all is in charge any more:
fpc -va --
[0.001]
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:39:33 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/17/2010 11:31 AM, Sven Barth wrote:
Should I just remove it ?
Might be the wisest solution.
renamed it and now I get:
Clean Lazarus Source completed
Fatal: Can't find unit system used by AllLCLUnits
I suppose now no fpc.cfg
On 12/17/2010 03:08 AM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
make install does not rewrite your fpc.cfg nor replace a symlink to
fpc executable.
Thanks for letting me know.
But now I don't know who put it into /etc.
Should I just remove it ?
What fpc.cfg file is Lazarus supposed to use (when compiling
Am 17.12.2010 09:30, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 12/17/2010 03:08 AM, Paul Ishenin wrote:
make install does not rewrite your fpc.cfg nor replace a symlink to
fpc executable.
Thanks for letting me know.
But now I don't know who put it into /etc.
It might be from the last relased that you
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:44:30 +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 12/11/2010 11:57 PM, Bernd Kreuss wrote:
If you do a make install it might *not* replace an existing compiler
binary at /usr/bin/
I did check this by doing:
/usr/bin/fpc
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/12/09] for i386
On 12/16/2010 10:05 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
(fpc -va)
Thanks a lot. This results in
[0.019] Configfile search: /home/mschnell/.fpc.cfg
[0.019] Configfile search: /usr/lib/fpc/etc/fpc.cfg
[0.019] Configfile search: /etc/fpc.cfg
[0.019] Reading options from file /etc/fpc.cfg
[0.019]
2010/12/16 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
On 12/16/2010 10:05 AM, Andreas Schneider wrote:
(fpc -va)
Thanks a lot. This results in
[0.019] Configfile search: /home/mschnell/.fpc.cfg
[0.019] Configfile search: /usr/lib/fpc/etc/fpc.cfg
[0.019] Configfile search: /etc/fpc.cfg
On 12/16/2010 10:57 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
do you suggest I should check /etc/fpc.cfg
YES.
Thanks, I'll do so ASAP.
(which supposedly is rewritten
by any new fpc install)
This is an incorrect assumption.
Hmm. how else would have been written there. I do the compiling and
2010/12/16 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
(which supposedly is rewritten
by any new fpc install)
This is an incorrect assumption.
Hmm. how else would have been written there. I do the compiling and
installing of fpc as root, but I always start Lazarus as a normal user. So
only
On 12/16/2010 11:17 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
Hmm. how else would have been written there. I do the compiling and
installing of fpc as root, but I always start Lazarus as a normal user. So
only installing fpc has been able to write to /etc.
Maybe the file is from a previous install?
Not
16.12.2010 17:25, Michael Schnell wrote:
I did suppose that always when after doing make all, I do make
install (as root) on fpc, same would rewrite all non-user-specific fpc
files and /etc/fpc.cfg being one of those.
make install does not rewrite your fpc.cfg nor replace a symlink to
fpc
On 09.12.2010 11:46, Michael Schnell wrote:
Did you update FPC?
Yep from the svn
If you do a make install it might *not* replace an existing compiler
binary at /usr/bin/
I once had the same problem, I was updating from svn and did not notice
that after make install it did not replace the
On 12/03/2010 08:10 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Don't mix versions unless you know very well what you are doing.
I am not aware of using any mixes versions.
The installed FPC version is the one from the svn. To compile same I do
have an old version of FPC, but same is not installed, but
2010/12/9 Michael Schnell mschn...@lumino.de:
On 12/03/2010 08:10 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Don't mix versions unless you know very well what you are doing.
I am not aware of using any mixes versions.
The installed FPC version is the one from the svn. To compile same I do have
an old
On 12/03/2010 08:22 PM, Martin wrote:
On 03/12/2010 13:09, Michael Schnell wrote:
What do do, depends on how you got into the error.
Did you update FPC?
Yep from the svn
Did you install a 2nd newer version of fpc in parallel to the 1st fpc?
No. I only have an old version (that is not
On 12/09/2010 11:30 AM, Vincent Snijders wrote:
You did not try the things that Martin suggested?
Not yet (see my mail to Martin)...
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
You can run Lazarus from console or with logfile (--debug-log=xxx)
Or you can copy all and hidden) on the msg vie window (popup menu)
Any of this 3 should give you additional info about the output that fpc
generates
On 09/12/2010 10:46, Michael Schnell wrote:
Check what fpc compiler lazarus
Am 09.12.2010 11:46, schrieb Michael Schnell:
which fpc
/usr/local/bin/fpc
/usr/local/bin/fpc
Free Pascal Compiler version 2.5.1 [2010/12/03] for i386
Copyright (c) 1993-2010 by Florian Klaempfl
/usr/lib/fpc/2.5.1/ppc386 [options] inputfile [options]
This doesn't match! /usr/bin/fpc should
On 12/09/2010 02:42 PM, Martin wrote:...
I'll give all this a try ASAP.
Thanks a lot !
-Michael
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 02:09:52PM +0100, Michael Schnell wrote:
Recompiling contnrs, checksum changed for System
masks.pas(29,22) Fatal: Can't find unit contnrs used by Masks
Since many weeks I get this error when trying to recompile the newest
svn version of Lazarus with the newest svn
On 03/12/2010 13:09, Michael Schnell wrote:
Recompiling contnrs, checksum changed for System
masks.pas(29,22) Fatal: Can't find unit contnrs used by Masks
Since many weeks I get this error when trying to recompile the newest
svn version of Lazarus with the newest svn Version of FPC.
I
31 matches
Mail list logo
