Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
What makes you so sure?
I already used Windows comboboxes decades ago, on Win3.1.
AFAIR the native Windows combo box is really limited
On Wed, 28 Dec 2011, Vincent Snijders wrote:
2011/12/28 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho :
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
What makes you so sure?
AFAIR the native Windows combo box is really limited on the h
2011/12/28 Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho :
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
> wrote:
>> No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
>
> What makes you so sure?
>
> AFAIR the native Windows combo box is really limited on the height.
Except when using the ancient cs
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Hans-Peter Diettrich
wrote:
> No, it's a limitation (or bug) in the Lazarus widgeset.
What makes you so sure?
AFAIR the native Windows combo box is really limited on the height.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Howard Page-Clark schrieb:
On 27/12/11 12:57, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
A combobox with csSimple style is not handled properly at design time
(win32). It's impossible to give the control a specific Height, it stays
on the dropdown style equivalent (Height=23).
Is it me, or is this a bug?
I
On 27/12/11 12:57, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
A combobox with csSimple style is not handled properly at design time
(win32). It's impossible to give the control a specific Height, it stays
on the dropdown style equivalent (Height=23).
Is it me, or is this a bug?
I think it's a limitation of t
A combobox with csSimple style is not handled properly at design time
(win32). It's impossible to give the control a specific Height, it stays
on the dropdown style equivalent (Height=23).
Is it me, or is this a bug?
DoDi
--
___
Lazarus mailing lis