On Sun, 6 Jun 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 10:40:08AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
None of the OS packaging mechanisms (rpm, .deb) allow you to do a user install
(well, not without very complicated tricks)
FreeBSD does, but maybe that is not really an user i
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 10:40:08AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> None of the OS packaging mechanisms (rpm, .deb) allow you to do a user install
> (well, not without very complicated tricks)
FreeBSD does, but maybe that is not really an user install. In fact one
creates a second package ad
On 6/5/2010 04:40, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, waldo kitty wrote:
basically "per user"...
The FPC installs for *unix allow you to install wherever you want,
provided you have permissions for it.
i've not seen that when i've installed the Laz packages that i've
toyed with o
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, waldo kitty wrote:
On 6/4/2010 07:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, waldo kitty wrote:
On 6/3/2010 14:33, Marc Santhoff wrote:
For practical reason it has always been the better way to install fpc
and lazarus per user, not globally in the systems /usr
Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> As a side note:
> On my own *nix systems I always create a 'developer' user group and
> then give that group read/write access to /opt. So in a way it's
> similar to installing to $HOME. I hardly ever install custom software
> to
On 6/4/2010 07:26, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, waldo kitty wrote:
On 6/3/2010 14:33, Marc Santhoff wrote:
For practical reason it has always been the better way to install fpc
and lazarus per user, not globally in the systems /usr/local tree. It is
easier to swap compilers
On 6/4/2010 06:18, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 4 June 2010 06:32, waldo kitty wrote:
what would it take for the various *nix flavor maintainers to fix their
install scripts so that FPC and/or Lazarus were installed in this manner? it
would definitely fix a lot of headaches when it comes to inst
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 10:40:30AM -0400, waldo kitty wrote:
> >> scripts so that FPC and/or Lazarus were installed in this manner? it would
> >> definitely fix a lot of headaches when it comes to installing the prepared
> >> release packages...
> >
> > I always do install them to some prefix (e.g.
On 6/4/2010 02:53, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:32:23AM -0400, waldo kitty wrote:
On 6/3/2010 14:33, Marc Santhoff wrote:
For practical reason it has always been the better way to install fpc
and lazarus per user, not globally in the systems /usr/local tree. It is
easier
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, waldo kitty wrote:
On 6/3/2010 14:33, Marc Santhoff wrote:
For practical reason it has always been the better way to install fpc
and lazarus per user, not globally in the systems /usr/local tree. It is
easier to swap compilers or mess with the sources of something that
oth
On 4 June 2010 06:32, waldo kitty wrote:
>
> what would it take for the various *nix flavor maintainers to fix their
> install scripts so that FPC and/or Lazarus were installed in this manner? it
> would definitely fix a lot of headaches when it comes to installing the
> prepared release packages..
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:32:23AM -0400, waldo kitty wrote:
> On 6/3/2010 14:33, Marc Santhoff wrote:
> > For practical reason it has always been the better way to install fpc
> > and lazarus per user, not globally in the systems /usr/local tree. It is
> > easier to swap compilers or mess with the
On 6/3/2010 14:33, Marc Santhoff wrote:
For practical reason it has always been the better way to install fpc
and lazarus per user, not globally in the systems /usr/local tree. It is
easier to swap compilers or mess with the sources of something that
otherwise would be r/o. Concluding there is no
Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 08:53 +0200 schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any developers using Lazarus under FreeBSD?
I do.
> Does Lazarus support FreeBSD?
I simply works when used with the matching compiler.
> Somebody asking me this question today, but I
> couldn't actually an
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi,
Are there any developers using Lazarus under FreeBSD? Does Lazarus
support FreeBSD? Somebody asking me this question today, but I
couldn't actually answer them. Looking at the release downloads page,
it seems FreeBSD is not supported (there is
Hi,
Are there any developers using Lazarus under FreeBSD? Does Lazarus
support FreeBSD? Somebody asking me this question today, but I
couldn't actually answer them. Looking at the release downloads page,
it seems FreeBSD is not supported (there is no binary downloads for
that platform, unless you
16 matches
Mail list logo
