Just a brief note to say that I've checked Lazarus trunk (35112) with
FPC 2.6.0 on a SPARC system running Solaris 10 and basic operation
appears OK.
I've not investigated the compiler in sufficient depth to determine
whether recent code generation patches have been incorporated, elsewhere
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Lazarus ground to a halt after a week with a linking error (gld: cannot
find -lgdk_pixbuf), I suspect that Solaris only has this for gtk v2.
I'm going to wrap up some year-end maintenance work and then get Solaris
onto a faster system before continuing. I'll be back.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd Lazarus ground to
a halt after a week with a linking error (gld: cannot find
-lgdk_pixbuf), I suspect that Solaris only has this for gtk v2.
This is a FAQ
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd Lazarus ground to
a halt after a week with a linking error (gld: cannot find
-lgdk_pixbuf), I suspect that Solaris only has this for gtk v2.
This is a FAQ
No it's not, I'm not asking a question.
I
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:28:28AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Working on it. What I'm hoping to do is get a basic lazarus compiled,
then bigide, then check over the remaining packages. At that point I
can raise a categorised report, if
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:28:28AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Working on it. What I'm hoping to do is get a basic lazarus compiled,
then bigide, then check over the remaining packages. At that point I can
raise a categorised report, if we're very lucky everything
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 07:23:58PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I can see clocale RTL files:
./fpcsrc/rtl/unix/clocale.pp
./fpcsrc/rtl/bsd/clocale.inc
./fpcdocs/clocale.xml
I presume that I need to do something like finding why clocale.pp isn't
being compiled for
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd I'm not confident
I can get SVN running on this system- any guidance about
recording changes as diffs etc. would be appreciated.
There is a command line tool called diff
You can copy the changed files to another computer and diff them
against
Ah, or even easier: Just copy the changed files to a computer with
svn. Override the original svn files and then do:
svn diff =)
That should be quicker.
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mark Morgan Lloyd I'm not confident
I can get SVN running on this system- any guidance about
recording changes as diffs etc. would be appreciated.
There is a command line tool called diff
You can copy the changed files to
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:00:13AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
against the original from svn. Each file would produce one diff file.
I know. However there are various conventions- unified and so on- and
different projects have different preferred ways of working.
99% of the world,
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:00:13AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
against the original from svn. Each file would produce one diff file.
I know. However there are various conventions- unified and so on- and
different projects have different preferred ways of working.
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:28:28AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Working on it. What I'm hoping to do is get a basic lazarus compiled,
then bigide, then check over the remaining packages. At that point I can
raise a categorised report, if we're very lucky everything will work and
the
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:22:19PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If you can confirm that it works, I'll enable it.
OK, I'll get onto it later. In this context what constitutes working-
that it compiles without error or is there a functional test?
Compile and link
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:22:19PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If you can confirm that it works, I'll enable it.
OK, I'll get onto it later. In this context what constitutes working-
that it compiles without error or is there a functional
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
iconvenc compiles and the test runs although the output is Greek to me.
This is the only one I've tried so far.
Building Lazarus with gmake LCL_PLATFORM=gtk all (i.e. not yet trying
bigide) runs most of the way through, until it gets to
gmake -C ide ide
gmake[1]:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:46:06AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Probably you want to make a difference between the solaris line and the
FreeBSD (this avoids some inheritly Linux specific packages) line there,
and
test which packages work with solaris.
The packages in Solaris appear
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 07:23:58PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I can see clocale RTL files:
./fpcsrc/rtl/unix/clocale.pp
./fpcsrc/rtl/bsd/clocale.inc
./fpcdocs/clocale.xml
I presume that I need to do something like finding why clocale.pp isn't
being compiled for Solaris (i.e.
I've now got a Solaris 10 SPARC system set up here, limited disc space
etc. and not (yet) on a public IP address.
I've got FPC installed and self-building subject to a couple of minor
issues (0018271) and am now having a bash at building Lazarus. If I do a
gmake clean I get to here
Mark Morgan Lloyd kirjoitti maanantai 20 joulukuu 2010 11:39:22:
Where do I go next? :-)
It is a FPC version mismatch. What version you have?
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 09:39:22AM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
uses
SysUtils, Classes, dos, LCLProc
{$IFDEF HasIconvEnc},iconvenc{$ENDIF};
Where do I go next? :-)
This is a FPC issue not lazarus. FPC doesn't compile the iconvenc package (
fpc/packages/iconvenc ) not for solaris.
Juha Manninen wrote:
Mark Morgan Lloyd kirjoitti maanantai 20 joulukuu 2010 11:39:22:
Where do I go next? :-)
It is a FPC version mismatch. What version you have?
2.4.2 plus Lazarus from SVN on Saturday, which compiles OK on other
platforms.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 01:22:19PM +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
If you can confirm that it works, I'll enable it.
OK, I'll get onto it later. In this context what constitutes working-
that it compiles without error or is there a functional test?
Compile and link (the iconv lib is
23 matches
Mail list logo
