On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 02:30:47PM +0200, Paul van Helden wrote:
Well, I like it. Animals are not common as mascots for commercial
software and to me, personally, shows that you're dealing with a
community (warm, friendly) instead of a corporate entity (cold, greedy).
We already
On 2010/02/09 10:06 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
It is a real pity about Jack Wolfskin, but I'd still go for the paw and
refrain from making T-Shirts with it (or at least have the T-Shirts made
by someone who cannot be sued :-) ). A big cat's paw print is the
ultimate emblem of stealth and
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:55:37AM +0200, Paul van Helden wrote:
refrain from making T-Shirts with it (or at least have the T-Shirts made
by someone who cannot be sued :-) ). A big cat's paw print is the
ultimate emblem of stealth and speed IMHO, since you never see the
bugger ;-)
On 2010/02/09 11:14 AM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:55:37AM +0200, Paul van Helden wrote:
I guess it depends on how far you want to take this free-as-in-speech
thing then?
Support it, but don't try to be a martyr.
You have to suffer to be a martyr...
On 2/4/2010 11:15, Klenongan wrote:
@ waldo kitty
no preview there... both are the same image and look like a lottery thing calling out
upload and earn cash :?
Strange, I can see the images just fine. Maybe something wrong with
your proxy, or network settings? The xs.to is one of my
On 2/5/2010 06:24, Marco van de Voort wrote:
(*) there probably is a good blurb about the name python. There is also one
about Lazarus. When it is not instinctive however, it doesn't matter.
So yes to Ruby, no to Python. What about Emerald? It is more precious than
Ruby, provides a nice hook
On 2/5/2010 07:30, Paul van Helden wrote:
It is a real pity about Jack Wolfskin, but I'd still go for the paw and
refrain from making T-Shirts with it (or at least have the T-Shirts made
by someone who cannot be sued :-) ). A big cat's paw print is the
ultimate emblem of stealth and speed IMHO,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:24:25AM +0200, Paul van Helden wrote:
http://www.piqs.de/schnelluebersicht/search/gepard/
Is it just me or are there others that would agree that using real life
animal pictures are just plain cheezy? (Well, the current Lazarus logos
with cheetahs on
On 2010/02/05 01:20 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
It seems a significant portion of open source projects pick some animal,
almost as some type of mascot, and that is cool
How can something that everybody is doing be cool!??!
Well, I like it. Animals are not common as mascots for
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, Paul van Helden wrote:
On 2010/02/05 01:20 PM, Marco van de Voort wrote:
It seems a significant portion of open source projects pick some animal,
almost as some type of mascot, and that is cool
How can something that everybody is doing be cool!??!
Well, I like it.
I took minimalist approach because most new visitors will be
overwhelmed by things they have to read just to download the damned
thing. There are many reason why open source projects nowadays put a
big button on their front page just so anyone who visit the page for
the first time (either by word
I don't like the gradient fill blue (old fashioned) and even less
the idea of rotating banners in that position (annoying)
Please note that it's a work in progress, nothing is final. Please
read my other emails regarding this.
--
-Bee-
...making buzzes at http://twitter.com/beezing
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 20:16 +0700, Klenongan wrote:
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' color--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC,
On 04/02/2010 07:29, Paul van Helden wrote:
On 2010/02/04 07:56 AM, Martin wrote:
A related topic that's been bothering me: can we please discuss a
name change for Lazarus as well? It's not like a name change will
hurt the project at this stage, methinks...
-1
I don't see why changing the
Paul van Helden schrieb:
Is it just me or are there others that would agree that using real life
animal pictures are just plain cheezy?
+1
I vote for simply using the paw
(/images/splash_source/paw.png). It is a beautiful piece of artwork.
This image may conflict with Jack Wolfskin, who
Martin schrieb:
I had the National Geographic impression too... I did like the
proposal from Bee Jay (
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/676/lazwebnewsubpage030210.png )
Just another thing: I'd prefer the term multi-platform, in favor of
cross-platform, which latter is frequently used for
I don't like this design at all. Bee's design is much better.
...
What you expect on a home-page is links, links, links and a few lines
explaining things. Because every new-comer has a different reason to
come to that page. Some like screenshots, and decide what this product
is on those.
Hello Lazarus-List,
Thursday, February 4, 2010, 5:15:25 PM, you wrote:
K Strange, I can see the images just fine. Maybe something wrong with
K your proxy, or network settings? The xs.to is one of my bookmarked
K image host, I choose it because i can call it out of my head, being
K just 'xs.to'.
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 23:15 +0700, Klenongan wrote:
I don't like this design at all. Bee's design is much better.
...
What you expect on a home-page is links, links, links and a few lines
explaining things. Because every new-comer has a different reason to
come to that page. Some like
On Feb 4, 2010, at 11:15 PM, Klenongan wrote:
Well that's interesting, you don't know what Lazarus because you do
not want to read the text, which right next to a big picture. A text
below the name 'Lazarus' made bigger than the rest of the page, well
placed to be seen first, not only that I
Paul Ishenin wrote:
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown
but everything else blue. And I think that we are not able to change
logo and all icons to brown in a reasonable time.
Blue is
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb:
If somebody knows how to deactivate animations in Firefox, any hints
are very welcome!
Use the about:config
url.
filter on
image.animation_mode
Set value to 'none' (no quotes)
And that should be it.
Bingo! :-)
DoDi
--
On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 14:58 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
The content pages, will have a navigation bar below the shrinked
header. The shrinked header will be static which will show the
appropriate slide in regard with the content being displayed.
Here's my proposal for content page layout:
On Feb 3, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Nice.
Thanks.
I think that this part should be the same throughout the whole site.
No, the header will be changed according to what content being
displayed on the page. If it's FPC specific, then the header will show
FPC banner.
However, if we are making a concerted effort to present a more
'professional' web image, perhaps it is time to impose a more
consistent style on the more public and static pages, and agree on a
few rules of style and spelling (British or American English? IDE or
I.D.E.? and suchlike). What
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' color--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that new
visitors wont be overwhelmed by
Hi.
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' color--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that new
visitors wont be
On Feb 3, 2010, at 8:16 PM, Klenongan wrote:
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' color--.
Yes, it look more elegant. It's a nice design, I must say.
The page uses less text as possible
I took minimalist approach because most new visitors will be
overwhelmed by things they have to read just to download the damned
thing. There are many reason why open source projects nowadays put a
big button on their front page just so anyone who visit the page for
the first time (either by word
I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone on the
other thread to help us on this.
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
http://www.piqs.de/schnelluebersicht/search/gepard/
--
Choose the picture you like it and trace it with Inkscape or corel draw then
start to clean it up.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Michael Schneider mic...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone on
the
other thread to help us on this.
I think
On 2/3/2010 08:16, Klenongan wrote:
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' color--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that
Klenongan schrieb:
And here's mine, with more 'elegant' touch to it. I use large fonts
and white overall to make a neutral appearance --as I don't know
Lazarus' color--. The page uses less text as possible on the front
page, inspired by Mercurial, VLC, Wordpress website so that new
visitors
Michael Schneider schrieb:
I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone on the
other thread to help us on this.
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
The Three Cheetahs image could reflect the
On 2/3/2010 18:37, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Michael Schneider schrieb:
I suggest we use our own images. I already asked help from someone
on the
other thread to help us on this.
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
The
I think these pictures are under CreativCommons
http://animalphotos.info/a/topics/animals/mammals/cheetahs/
http://www.piqs.de/schnelluebersicht/search/gepard/
Is it just me or are there others that would agree that using real life
animal pictures are just plain cheezy? (Well, the current
On 04/02/2010 05:24, Paul van Helden wrote:
It seems a significant portion of open source projects pick some
animal, almost as some type of mascot, and that is cool. There isn't
one example, however, that I can think of where such website looks
like some page on National Geographic. From
Paul wrote
A related topic that's been bothering me: can we please discuss a
name change for Lazarus as well? It's not like a name change will
hurt the project at this stage, methinks...
Have you noticed that Firefox now has an add-on called Lazarus?
Isn't that irritating?
Cheers
Lance
04.02.2010 13:27, Lance Collins wrote:
Have you noticed that Firefox now has an add-on called Lazarus?
Isn't that irritating?
If you goodle for Delphi you find more things than Delphi from Embarcadero.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
___
Lazarus
Klenongan wrote:
Preview:
http://xs.to/image-FAED_4B6973FF.jpg
The big cheetah image makes me feel like I'm on a wildlife website and not
a software tools website.
PS:
I had a good laugh at the year range in the copyright notice. Very
optimistic that Lazarus will still be around. If it is,
On 2010/02/04 07:56 AM, Martin wrote:
I had the National Geographic impression too... I did like the
proposal from Bee Jay (
http://img41.imageshack.us/img41/676/lazwebnewsubpage030210.png )
I don't like the gradient fill blue (old fashioned) and even less the
idea of rotating banners in
02.02.2010 14:49, Bee Jay wrote:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown but
everything else blue. And I think that we
Hi,
Just thought I would mention that static pages is probably easier than any
CMS. Applying relatively simple CSS can make it look beautiful without the
need for fancy HTML.
To help with maintaining the website, we have done the following in the
tiOPF project. The HTML content is actually in
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown
but everything else blue. And I think that we are not able to change
logo and
Something like this could easily apply to Lazarus too, and it is
relatively
little effort to setup. Also designing the website so that in
doesn't use
serverside includes etc makes it easier for users to checkout the
website
from the repository and simply use a web browser to view the
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:49 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
Take a look at
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 09:26, Bee Jay bee.ogra...@gmail.com wrote:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Still I think that we must use blue colors. IDE uses blue logo, blue
icons. Everywhere the blue color dominates. Web site can't be brown but
everything
Looks good. Maybe we can add a tagline to the brownish header. 'Code
once, compile everywhere' could be it maybe. It has to tell what
Lazarus/fpc is as less as words possible.
Yes, as I asked previously, I need help about the wording. Somebody
who has a bit knowledge about marketting may
Personally, I like the other color scheme more than this one. But, I
would rather go with color scheme which is more in spirit of whole
project. (btw, how about having blue behind Lazarus less intense -
maybe more like those at the top and bottom?)
BTW, my post is about the content structure as
Bee Jay wrote:
Here's the blue one:
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Looks good, but isn't there a spelling mistake in the title on content. It
seem so many people make this mistake.
The correct spelling is Free Pascal and *not* FreePascal.
See website
Bee Jay wrote:
Here's the blue one:
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is IDE
and not I.D.E. :-)
Regards,
- Graeme -
--
fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:35 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
Looks good. Maybe we can add a tagline to the brownish header. 'Code
once, compile everywhere' could be it maybe. It has to tell what
Lazarus/fpc is as less as words possible.
Yes, as I asked previously, I need help about the wording.
Bee Jay wrote:
Is there anything still missing from there?
No the content is MUCH better than the current website. I like the summary
information and the roadmap (links) at the bottom. On page for the user
and they can easily branch off from there no more specific information.
Easy to spot!
02.02.2010 15:44, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Brown. But that's personal, offcourse.
No matter what we like. I believe it is possible to draw it perfect
using blue colors. Again IDE icons and logos can't be in another color
sheme as a web-site.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 15:40 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
Personally, I like the other color scheme more than this one. But, I
would rather go with color scheme which is more in spirit of whole
project. (btw, how about having blue behind Lazarus less intense -
maybe more like those at the top and
Bee Jay wrote:
BTW, which one do you like? the brown one or the blue one? :)
Yes, the 'Code once, Compile everywhere' slogan is important. Just like the
similar slogan used in Java.
As for color, I think the blue theme should be used. After all, FPC,
Lazarus, Wiki and Mantis websites already
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Paul Ishenin wrote:
02.02.2010 15:44, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
Brown. But that's personal, offcourse.
No matter what we like. I believe it is possible to draw it perfect using
blue colors. Again IDE icons and logos can't be in another color sheme as a
web-site.
I
For example, when you click on 'support(s)' what kind of page do you
see? Of is if a menu which shows when you hover your mouse above it,
so
that 'Mailing lists','online forum', 'IRC' etc appears?
My approach is to be less JS as possible, more static HTML/CSS. It'll
be easier to maintain.
Bee Jay wrote:
Personally, I like the other color scheme more than this one. But, I
would rather go with color scheme which is more in spirit of whole
project. (btw, how about having blue behind Lazarus less intense -
maybe more like those at the top and bottom?)
BTW, my post is about the
Perhaps i'm the only one missing a link to the Wiki pages?
It's available on the footer section.
It's my understanding that most of the current content for
developers is placed on the wiki. So perhaps such a link should be
placed in the top bar along with the downloads and support.
The
I really like the page design!
Thanks.
I have a suggestion for the wording at the top of the page - see it
below.
You will see it is a bit more explanatory, perhaps more suitable for
students. It also omits 'native', and I suggest this can be picked
up in your 'cross-platform' stuff
02.02.2010 16:27, Bee Jay wrote:
- native (more to Lazarus)
- cross platform (more to FPC)
I would say vice-versa.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
The big header section isn't static. It will be slide-like
presentation that will highlight key features of both FPC and Lazarus.
One more thing. The header section is available on the front page
only. It wouldn't be available on the other deeper pages. The top link
section and footer
Bee Jay wrote:
A design like this can even be served using current smf/tp site (till
our own pascalbased is ready)
Well, actually I'm thinking about Wordpress. I'm trying to collaborate
both ideas, using available mostly php-based CMS or build custom CMS
based on fpWeb. Also the contents can
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:35 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
The big header section isn't static. It will be slide-like
presentation that will highlight key features of both FPC and Lazarus.
One more thing. The header section is available on the front page
only. It wouldn't be available on the
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 16:35 +0700, Bee Jay wrote:
The big header section isn't static. It will be slide-like
presentation that will highlight key features of both FPC and Lazarus.
One more thing. The header section is available on the front page
only. It wouldn't be available on the
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:49:07AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bee Jay wrote:
Is there anything still missing from there?
No the content is MUCH better than the current website. I like the summary
information and the roadmap (links) at the bottom. On page for the user
and they can
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bee Jay wrote:
Here's the blue one:
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is IDE
and not I.D.E. :-)
I would not use the term
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bee Jay wrote:
Here's the blue one:
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is IDE
I place the wiki link on Contribution section, not on Docs section,
because I want to emphasize the contribution rather than the
document. ;)
It means lots of contents must be moved from wiki to the new static pages,
right?
Regards,
Juha Manninen
--
02.02.2010 17:16, Juha Manninen wrote:
I place the wiki link on Contribution section, not on Docs section,
because I want to emphasize the contribution rather than the
document. ;)
It means lots of contents must be moved from wiki to the new static pages,
right?
Not exatly. Maybe the main
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:05:05AM +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is IDE
and not I.D.E. :-)
I would not use the term IDE, but RAD, and reserve IDE for the textmode IDE.
No, since lazarus is not a RAD. It is an IDE,
On 02/02/2010 07:49, Bee Jay wrote:
I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
Take a look at
Ok, and how a user can 'see' where he is? And what we are looking at
now
is the first level navigation. What about the second and third?
Good question. I haven't finish the deeper pages layout proposal. The
content pages, will have a navigation bar below the shrinked header.
The shrinked
Instead or in addition to the text feature highlights some icons
or screenshots? So users can visually recognize the most important
features?
Yes, that's the plan. My designer needs some time to design the
required images and icons. Once it's done, I will post it on the
appearance
Juha Manninen wrote:
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
Yes, please don't. And please don't use cheesy animations like the running
cheetah either - that is so 80's style! Very cheesy!!
There are many pages with animated ads that hog 70% of my CPU and I don't
want
to
On Feb 2, 2010, at 6:13 PM, Juha Manninen wrote:
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
There are many pages with animated ads that hog 70% of my CPU and I
don't want
to keep them open for long.
It'd be a simple JS animation, not flash and nothing fancy.
Another wish:
I
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
I would not use the term IDE, but RAD, and reserve IDE for the textmode IDE.
IMO RAD is a development model or qualifier (RAD Studio), while IDE is
a concrete implementation (FP IDE, Lazarus IDE, Delphi IDE). In the
given context it should be clear that the
Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
I would not use the term IDE, but RAD, and reserve IDE for the textmode IDE.
IMO RAD is a development model or qualifier (RAD Studio), while IDE is
a concrete implementation (FP IDE, Lazarus IDE, Delphi IDE). In the
given context
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some highlight
features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
I have a mental problem with
On 02/02/2010 14:08, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some
highlight features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some highlight
features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations
On 2/2/2010 2:49 AM, Bee Jay wrote:
I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
Take a look at
On 2 February 2010 18:01, Michael Van Canneyt mich...@freepascal.org wrote:
And that should be it.
Ah you beat me to it, I should have read all message before I replied.
Sorry for the duplicate
--
Regards,
- Graeme -
___
fpGUI - a
On 2/2/2010 04:59, Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:45:12AM +0200, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Bee Jay wrote:
Here's the blue one:
http://img704.imageshack.us/img704/3214/lazwebnew020210blue.png
Another spelling mistake in the bottom of the page. The spelling is IDE
and
On 2/2/2010 06:13, Juha Manninen wrote:
Hi,
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some highlight
features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations very heavy for CPU.
There are
On 2/2/2010 09:08, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
Below it, it's an animated large header which will show some
highlight features of FPC/Lazarus in rotation.
Please don't make the animations very
The content pages, will have a navigation bar below the shrinked
header. The shrinked header will be static which will show the
appropriate slide in regard with the content being displayed.
Here's my proposal for content page layout:
help. Also, I think that
win7/vista users need a Microsoft download to run the chm version.
best wishes
Mike
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:49:56 +0100
From: Aleksa Todorovic alexi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Lazarus] Reconstructing Lazarus Website 2: the content
To: Lazarus mailing list lazarus
Bee Jay wrote:
It does not need to be part of a CMS - can just be static pages,
linking to documentation, wiki.
Yes, that's what I'm gonna do first. Just a good appearance with a
collection of bunches of links and some appropriate semi-marketting
words campaign. Once it's settled, the CMS
I've made a very basic design, just to show off my page layout and
content structure proposal. It's not yet about the true design (color,
theme, etc) and the accessories (images, icons, etc).
Take a look at http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5716/lazwebnew020210.png
On this design, at the
Several things which should be easily visible/accessible to anyone who
comes for the first time, or wants to get started with Lazarus:
What is it? - explaining in short what is Lazarus, LCL, FPC, Lazarus-CCR
How does it look like? - screenshots of Lazarus on different
platforms, different Lazarus
@Aleksa
I almost completely agree.
There should probably be a section with these information on the first
page. The first page should primarily be for those who come for the
first time - to attract them, and show them what Lazarus really is.
Exactly. This is important and could be done in
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 18:20, theo x...@theo.ch wrote:
Only thing I do not agree: I think we should not compare Lazarus with Delphi
and other tools. It's a little cheap / bad taste.
Theo
I think it's important to have some as-objective-as-possible
comparison for people who used and liked
Aleksa Todorovic schrieb:
Only thing I do not agree: I think we should not compare Lazarus with Delphi
and other tools. It's a little cheap / bad taste.
Theo
I think it's important to have some as-objective-as-possible
comparison for people who used and liked Delphi (like most of us are,
I
Hi all,
Now, let's talk about the content and its structure. From the first
email, I have shared some references, maybe we could go from there.
Some things need to be considered are:
- what contents we're gonna provide to the visitors?
- which contents need to be displayed on the main page?
96 matches
Mail list logo
