On 12/05/2012 01:48 PM, Andrew Brunner wrote:
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can someone
revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems it will be valid.
Ok, I have a patch for the LCL but before we get further I think we need
more discussion
On 11/12/2012 17:55, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On 12/05/2012 01:48 PM, Andrew Brunner wrote:
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can
someone revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems
it will be valid.
Ok, I have a patch for the LCL but before we
On 11/12/2012 17:55, Andrew Brunner wrote:
So the question becomes... Is the use of int64 actually ubiquitous on
a 32bit system? If so, it may stand to reason that the values of
Progress bar be expanded to Int64 even on 32bit systems.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=23471
I am
On 7-12-2012 21:12, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Donald Ziesig don...@ziesig.org wrote:
I just got into this thread, but I have been using Delphi since Version 1
(and Turbo Pascal back to Version 1 before that). Imo the Min, Max and Pos
parameters should all be set
On 12/7/12, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
But typically a progress bar is used in conjunction with streams. Therefore
it should handle the same size as objects like that.
Why?
I typically set Max to 100 and calc percentage, et voila...
Bart
--
On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Donald Ziesig don...@ziesig.org wrote:
I just got into this thread, but I have been using Delphi since Version 1
(and Turbo Pascal back to Version 1 before that). Imo the Min, Max and Pos
parameters should all be set to the largest integer data type of the
On 2012-12-06 04:42, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
A control on screen is painted pixel-by-pixel, you cannot have
fractions of pixels on the screen.
Actually you can, but it is more of an optical illusion. :)
eg: floating point calculation for anti-aliased drawing. With AggPas I
can draw a 0.4
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:34 AM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
In the time it took to convince you there is a problem the solution could
have been adopted.
Please this isn't about pixels, it's about efficient scaling onto 64bit
systems. Hence a flaw.
I think the streaming
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
I assert that use of anything but ptrint in the factory with respect to
tprogressbar is a flaw. And it's a quick fix.
It is not a flaw, you need to scale your number to fit the provided size.
--
Felipe Monteiro de
On 12/05/2012 10:28 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
How wide would that row be, at say 120 dpi? BG
This is not relevant to the issue at hand. As I stated before, the
progressbar component of the host operating system scales the
Min/Max/Position values and converts it to the client area
On 6-12-2012 14:58, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On 12/05/2012 10:28 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
How wide would that row be, at say 120 dpi? BG
This is not relevant to the issue at hand. As I stated before, the
progressbar component of the host operating system scales the
Min/Max/Position
On 12/06/2012 09:06 AM, Reinier Olislagers wrote:
On 6-12-2012 14:58, Andrew Brunner wrote:
On 12/05/2012 10:28 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
How wide would that row be, at say 120 dpi? BG
This is not relevant to the issue at hand. As I stated before, the
progressbar component of the
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can someone
revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems it will be valid.
Thanks.
Andrew Brunner,
Aurawin LLC
512.574.6298
http://aurawin.com/
Aurawin is great new way to store and share your pictures,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can someone
revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems it will be
valid.
You can scale the value in your code before using it for
.
On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can someone
revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems
On Dec 5, 2012, at 4:01 PM, Vincent Snijders vincent.snijd...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/12/5 Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com:
.
On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com
wrote:
I'm
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
The design time vales are all zeros anyways.
ProgressBar.Position can be set also at design time.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Dec 5, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Juha Manninen juha.mannine...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
The design time vales are all zeros anyways.
ProgressBar.Position can be set also at design time.
Point 1. The IDE input could
Juha Manninen schrieb:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can someone
revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems it will be valid.
You can scale the value in your code
On 12/5/2012 17:43, Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can someone
revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems it will
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 2:46 AM, waldo kitty wkitt...@windstream.net wrote:
multi-monitors spread horizontally??
C'mon...
Please take a calculator and check how much is 2^31.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Dec 5, 2012, at 4:43 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich drdiettri...@aol.com wrote:
Juha Manninen schrieb:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Brunner atbrun...@aurawin.com wrote:
I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can
someone revise all values from integer to
Andrew Brunner schrieb:
Integer has 2^31 positive values which should be enough for all
the positions shown in a graphical component.
Does anybody have an screen or printer, with so many pixels? ;-)
[That's why Integer is way enough for a progress bar]
You are serious ?!? There is no
waldo kitty schrieb:
Integer has 2^31 positive values which should be enough for all the
positions shown in a graphical component.
Does anybody have an screen or printer, with so many pixels? ;-)
[That's why Integer is way enough for a progress bar]
multi-monitors spread horizontally??
24 matches
Mail list logo