On 01/15/2011 10:18 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
How stable is ReactOS these days? Last time I use it, was over a year
ago, and then not all Windows apps functioned correctly either.
I d/lded and tried the ReacOS life CD some months ago. It did not start
on any of the PCs I tried to boot it
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2011 10:18 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
How stable is ReactOS these days? Last time I use it, was over a year
ago, and then not all Windows apps functioned correctly either.
I d/lded and tried the ReacOS life CD some months ago. It did not start
on any of the
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 01/15/2011 10:18 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
How stable is ReactOS these days? Last time I use it, was over a year
ago, and then not all Windows apps functioned correctly either.
I d/lded and tried the ReacOS life CD some months ago. It did not start
on any of the
Sven Barth wrote:
On 16.01.2011 14:58, Sven Barth wrote:
On 16.01.2011 05:11, Paul Breneman wrote:
On the ReactOS forums there have been a few discussions (long ago) of
being able to strip away the GUI. I think that would be a great option
but it seems the developers are trying to duplicate NT
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 22:29 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've got one Solaris 8 and one Solaris 10 development system, I'm
currently backporting FPC onto 8 (works, but haven't proven it can
compile itself). I might go looking for (Open)Solaris 11, but at present
I google'ed Solaris and
On 16.01.2011 05:11, Paul Breneman wrote:
On the ReactOS forums there have been a few discussions (long ago) of
being able to strip away the GUI. I think that would be a great option
but it seems the developers are trying to duplicate NT and they have
little interest in such an option.
At
On 16.01.2011 14:58, Sven Barth wrote:
On 16.01.2011 05:11, Paul Breneman wrote:
On the ReactOS forums there have been a few discussions (long ago) of
being able to strip away the GUI. I think that would be a great option
but it seems the developers are trying to duplicate NT and they have
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 22:29 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
I've got one Solaris 8 and one Solaris 10 development system, I'm
currently backporting FPC onto 8 (works, but haven't proven it can
compile itself). I might go looking for (Open)Solaris 11, but at present
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Mark
/export/home/local-share/fpgui/fpgui-0.7/lib/sparc-solaris/fpg_x11.o(.text+0x10f0): In
function `FPG_X11_TFPGX11APPLICATION_$__STARTCOMPOSING$TXEVENT$$LONGWORD': : undefined
reference to `Xutf8LookupString' plus three more referring to the same function. It
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Hi Mark
/export/home/local-share/fpgui/fpgui-0.7/lib/sparc-solaris/fpg_x11.o(.text+0x10f0):
In function
`FPG_X11_TFPGX11APPLICATION_$__STARTCOMPOSING$TXEVENT$$LONGWORD': :
undefined reference to `Xutf8LookupString' plus three more
referring
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 09:52 -0500, Paul Breneman wrote:
On ReactOS I see the same problem with the icons on the buttons, but the
open file dialog text is OK.
How stable is ReactOS these days? Last time I use it, was over a year
ago, and then not all Windows apps functioned correctly either.
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 12:20 +, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
OK, it compiles and runs with that hack- at least enough to prove the
concept.
Thank for giving feedback on your progress - I'm glad I could help a
bit.
You helped a lot, because fpGUI and the UI designer
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 09:52 -0500, Paul Breneman wrote:
On ReactOS I see the same problem with the icons on the buttons, but the
open file dialog text is OK.
How stable is ReactOS these days? Last time I use it, was over a year
ago, and then not all Windows apps
Paul Breneman wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On Sat, 2011-01-15 at 09:52 -0500, Paul Breneman wrote:
On ReactOS I see the same problem with the icons on the buttons, but
the open file dialog text is OK.
How stable is ReactOS these days? Last time I use it, was over a year
ago, and then not
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:02:17 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:08:45 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It is a very long mail thread. Maybe you can
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:02:17 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:08:45 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It is a very long mail thread.
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Got it, mea culpa:
WorkDir=/usr/local/share/lazarus-trunk/lcl
but the version of Lazarus I was running was 0.9.29 in lazarus-testing.
With that fixed I can build an fpGUI LCL from inside Lazarus, can
compile and run a trivial test program, and can build the UI
Hi Mark
/export/home/local-share/fpgui/fpgui-0.7/lib/sparc-solaris/fpg_x11.o(.text+0x10f0):
In function
`FPG_X11_TFPGX11APPLICATION_$__STARTCOMPOSING$TXEVENT$$LONGWORD':
: undefined reference to `Xutf8LookupString'
plus three more referring to the same function. It looks as though that's
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It is a very long mail thread. Maybe you can summarize the problem?
I've got a number of machines here on which I've got a copy of FPC 2.4.2
which will build itself, which I think confers a reasonable level of
confidence on the compiler and libraries.
Where these
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:08:45 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It is a very long mail thread. Maybe you can summarize the problem?
[...]
Using the instructions at
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/fpGUI_Interface i.e. with 3x
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 14:08:45 +
Mark Morgan Lloyd markmll.laza...@telemetry.co.uk wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
It is a very long mail thread. Maybe you can summarize the problem?
[...]
Using the instructions at
21 matches
Mail list logo
